Frost Hits the Rhubarb
No subject should be outside the realm of debate in a democratic society.
June 10, 2006
June 10, 06: CSIS Jack Hooper, Deputy Director Operations
Fund our security services adequately; don't create new ones. Let the agencies we already have do the jobs for which they have trained and are eminently capable. Then, let the mainstream media and the courts not undo their efforts ... you may have your own examples of this.
Statement by Jack Hooper, Deputy Director Operations
Canadian Security Intelligence Service
to the Senate Committee on National Security and Defence
(SCONSAD), May 29th, 2006
http://
www.csis-scrs.gc.ca/en
/newsroom/speeches/speech29052006.asp
[....] First, the current threat environment related to terrorism; and
Secondly, our organization's specific interests in Afghanistan.
Terrorist activities inspired by the "Al Qaida ideology and operational doctrine" are currently the most prominent and immediate terrorist security threat faced globally and domestically. It is a phenomenon that has been manifested in many parts of the world.
[....] There has been, as well, a growing trend towards non-terrorist criminal activity by these individuals and groups to either generate revenue or acquire materials in their terrorist planning.
Canada is not now, nor has it ever been immune to the threat of terrorism. In fact, the committee will know that prior to the events of 9/11, the most significant act of terrorism in contemporary history, if you measure it in terms of casualties, had its roots in Canada. I am speaking of the Air India bombing, which resulted in the deaths of 329 people.
Similarly, Canadian citizens have not been immune more recently as witnessed in the deaths of Canadian citizens in the 9/11 attacks in the United States or in Bali. As well, Canadian military personnel and a diplomat serving in Afghanistan have been killed and wounded in terrorist attacks there and the threat to our forces there remains high.
We have not been immune from terrorism in other ways as well. There are residents in Canada that are graduates of terrorist training camps and campaigns, including experienced combatants from conflicts in Afghanistan, Bosnia, Chechnya and elsewhere.
As well, Canadian citizens or residents have been implicated in terrorist attacks and conspiracies elsewhere in the world. For example, a young man is now awaiting trial here in Ottawa because of his alleged involvement in a bombing conspiracy in the United Kingdom. Others have been involved in terrorist plots against targets in the United States, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Singapore, Pakistan and other countries.
Canada has been named on several occasions as one of six Western "target countries" by Al Qaida leaders, most recently last summer.
[.... Afghanistan]
Let me conclude with a few words about Afghanistan. It is a country that has been of interest to CSIS for a number of years. It continues to be of active interest to us for three basic reasons.
First, it has a long-standing association with the global terrorist phenomenon, particularly Al Qaida, dating back to the days of the Soviet occupation. Many foreign nationals were active participants, along with Afghan nationals, in the anti-Soviet campaign. Many of them continued their links with that organization after the Soviet withdrawal. And a good number of them, have since migrated elsewhere in the world, including to our country.
Second, the deployment of Canadian Forces to Afghanistan has resulted in our Service taking an active role to support our military colleagues in the country. While I am not at liberty to discuss the operational details or methodologies of that support, I can say two things about it.
This support has been principally focussed on the acquisition of intelligence to help the Canadian Forces defend themselves against terrorist attacks in that country. This intelligence is known to have saved lives, uncovered weapons and arms caches, and disrupted planned terrorist attacks.
The third reason we have a continuing active interest in Afghanistan comes back to concerns for the stability of the region, more broadly speaking. Afghanistan is the current venue where the terrorist designs of a number of organizations rooted in Pakistan, the central Asian republics and the subcontinent are planned and operationalized, and where individual activists seek support and sanctuary.
Our historical investigations have taught us at some point, this condition of broader regional instability will be the progenitor of terrorist threats in Canada. Therefore, we have to orient our collection programs not only tactically in response to current circumstances in Afghanistan, but strategically as well to better situate the Canadian security intelligence community against future threats.
In the here and now, terrorism and insurgency is being brought to Canadians in Afghanistan. At some future point, if we are to learn the lessons of history, their practitioners may bring violence to the streets of our cities.
June 09, 2006
June 9, 2006: Immigration
Re: Our World - Immigration - Questions to be Asked and Answered Posted by Bill Narvey on 13:13:52 2006/06/06. In Reply to: Re: Our World: The path to our destruction posted by mmaxx
[....] If all Muslim immigration is barred, that directly impacts on those barred, but those barred are not yet in Canada, so no rights Canada affords its citizens and those of other status residing or visiting here accrue to those who have not entered Canada? Does such bar on immigration deny the rights of those Muslims already in Canada and if so, what specific rights does such an immigration policy affecting others infringe or transgress? [....]
If all Muslim immigration is barred, that directly impacts on those barred, but those barred are not yet in Canada, so no rights Canada affords its citizens and those of other status residing or visiting here accrue to those who have not entered Canada? Does such bar on immigration deny the rights of those Muslims already in Canada and if so, what specific rights does such an immigration policy affecting others infringe or transgress? [....]
My comments:
Re: "In more extremely dangerous situations where all Canadians or citizens of other nations are in immediate danger, then one cannot afford the luxury of time [to]consider what the right questions are and to mull over answers to those questions. Rather an immediate response is necessitated by the immediacy of a threat."
I suggest that the laxity on immigration and carelessness about Canadians' security in the recent past and the extremely dangerous situation we are in now, place us in the kind of situation where the PM, his government and the Opposition should act to stem the tide NOW and work out the fine points later. (There have been enough apologies for actions taken in the past, some good, some bad. The times sometimes dictate action, not mulling over.)
That, combined with Muslims using our freedoms and laws to fight every attempt to stem the entry of dangerous people and to force us to accept their ways--radicalized imams preaching hate in mosques and even around or in universities, shariah, demanding too much tolerance related to Wahhabi education, the veil, treatment of women, attempts or refusal to have some (which? all?) burka-clad women's faces shown in passports, et cetera--along with the government's pandering to the "ethical" pronouncements from the UN about "rights" that have been slavishly followed by previous governments to the general detriment of Canadian citizens -- all mean we may have a situation which is already out of control.
No-one asked Canadians what they wanted nor what they want now. From the polls in the Globe and Mail today, I believe Canadians are a bit wiser now. Sometimes, like a parent, a government must put its foot down and declare something verboten, just because there is a sense of danger and it is better act in the interests of safety. That time is now.
I do not at this point care about the rights of immigrants from jihadi producing nations to bring their relatives here. I have a right to feel secure from alien threats and the potential for such. End all immigration of Muslims until the problem of Canadians becoming jihadis is fixed. That is, tackle the problem of how/why these Canadian-born jihadis are being produced and deal with that. Then worry about the rest.
I have heard enough for a lifetime about the "rights" of minorities and people from Canadian sub-groups whose "rights" have trumped my rights, too often. I am concerned about Muslims, not immigrants from Hindu countries (except their Muslims) nor Buddhists, nor Jews nor those from any number of other religious groups.
Get rid of the transnational problem; tackle the national problem; then talk to people like me about how many angels can sit on the "tolerance, reason and rights" head of a pin.
Reasoning and cogitating over the questions Bill Narvey raised--good and reasonable questions--may seem like a worthwhile endeavour, but I want action. The time for too much consideration of the rights of one subgroup [to bring in their relatives] identified by religion is long past.
Is that too right wing for this forum [CCD]? Que lastima! I simply don't care any more. I have the advantage over many in that I am willing to say it and write it ... before I am bombed into jihadi heaven and find there are no ... raisins(?) for women.
June 9, 2006: Bud Talkinghorn & Terrorism
Daimnation! 4 Jun 2006 -- Aly Hindy, imam at the Salaheddin Islamic Centre in Scarborough, said the charges ... The rebel Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) leader Khalil Ibrahim, ...
What I want to know is why the Liberals are on record for:
1. After 9/11, Chrétien denied there were any terrorist groups operating in his country until his own security organization went to the media and contradicted him, saying there were 50 such groups on Canadian soil.
2. Chretien also snubbed the World Trade Center tragedy when he refused to have an official memorial service for the almost 40 Canadian citizens who died in its rubble.
3. Chretien excused himself by saying that Hamas has a charitable wing that runs schools and hospitals in the Gaza strip and West Bank; only its military wing, he says, should be sanctioned.
4. "Terrorism should not stop us. Terrorism should motivate us" -Jean Chretien (Sep. 27, 2001 - from a speech delivered in Halifax during a nationwide storm of criticism that his government was not responding effectively to terrorist threats)
Does ex-PM Chretien not have to answer for any of Canada's insecurity?
And of course...more damning of the Liberal security 'attempts'. which leads to -- Is Canada Next Report: Western Canada's Conservative Voice -- by Paul Tuns, September 10, 2005. Posted by CCD in Business Report on 18:12:49 2005/09/10
Just a matter of where and when
[....] Alastair Gordon, president of the Canadian Coalition for Democracies (CCD), said that whether a group of people are attacked by Islamic terrorists has nothing to do with Iraq or Afghanistan. He noted that many innocents in countries that have nothing to do with American Middle Eastern policy are the victims of Islamist terror, including hundreds of farmers in Thailand, the murder of 300 schoolchildren in Beslan, Russia, the ethnic cleansing of Hindus in Kashmir, and countless other attacks around the world.
As the "Winds of Change" website has noted, Al Qa'eda has killed at least 4,895 innocent people and injured in addition 12,345 more in 16 countries since 1998. Told of these numbers, Gordon suggests it is folly to imagine Canada can long elude an attack. "Involvement with U.S. foreign policy has no relationship with being attacked by Islamic terrorists." he said. "They hate our way of life."
Liberal Senator Colin Kenny, chair of the Senate committee on National Security and Defence, wondered whether London caught the attention of Canadians, noting "Canada is the only country on the Al Qa'eda list that hasn't been hit yet."
Anne McLellan, [....] "We need to be constantly checking our systems, doing exercises and rehearsing."
Gordon said that he does not know "if psychological preparedness matters." He added, "What matters is prevention. Everything else is a red herring."
[....] While McLellan highlighted a reactive response to terrorism (checking our systems and rehearsing for emergencies), Bell and Gordon advocate a more proactive response that prevents terrorism by punishing and removing terrorists.
[....] In March 2004, in the wake of the Adscam scandal, Auditor General Sheila Fraser released another damning report, this one on Ottawa's inaction on addressing national security concerns. She highlighted the vulnerability of Canada's ports and airports to terrorist attacks, especially with regard to those who work there. She found that 5.5 percent of a sample of airport employees had possible criminal connections, a flag for national security concerns. If extrapolated to the entire airport workforce, there would be 4,500 employees with possible criminal connections the implications being that employees are not being properly screened, and those with criminal connections may also be tied to terrorist groups.
Senator Kenny's Security and Defence committee has released several reports over the last three years raising concerns about the country's lack of preparedness for terrorist attacks. In December 2004, Kenny released the 2005 edition of the Canadian Security Guide Book, which highlighted the same concerns Fraser drew attention to: improperly guarded and underguarded borders, and vulnerable ports and airports. In one example, he noted that Canada's ports of entry were jeopardized by the disappearance of 1,127 uniforms or uniform items belonging to Canadian airport screeners over a nine-month period, including 91 security badges.
Kenny's committee also alleges that the government is "cutting corners on intelligence." This seems to confirm Fraser's findings that nearly $9 billion in anti-terrorism money is not ending up where it is supposed to go, and that there are intelligence gaps resulting from fiscal mismanagement and oversight confusion. Kenny says the problem is not merely money but training; he said it can take years to properly train intelligence officers, but that there is no commitment to train a sufficient number of analysts. [....]
CBC was on militants list of bomb sites. Posted by Judith on 13:54:44 2006/06/06
My comments on this:
As long as CBC's best funding is tied to a corrupted and leftist/Liberal government, along with all the access, CBC will spout the leftist/Liberal mantras in order to help Liberals get back in power. I think CBC have massaged the Liberal message and bought their own lies for so long--in the service of maintaining their own perquisites and funding--that they no longer search for truth, nor can they see truth ... until it bombs them to smithereens. Then those who are left alive will be searching for root causes.
Yes, I'm cynical about this propaganda organ and everything else that government has funded in the past. Look into the United Nations tentacles in Canada for more. Follow the money.
Then check what the students are taught in schools and universities, the bilge for want of a politer word for what I am thinking. Teachers, like CBC types, are hired as much for their political views/correctness as for anything else. They fall into line. Follow the curricula and then see how hard it is going to be to change not just CBC, but so much else.
CCD: Our World: The path to our destruction Caroline Glick, Jerusalem Post, June 5, 2006 -- Posted by mmaxx on 05:23:09 2006/06/06
A Canadian Muslim friend who lives in Ontario told me recently that he has been unwelcome in his local mosque since the September 11 attacks on Washington and New York. His fellow Muslims have blackballed him because he made public statements critical of the hijackers and of al Qaida and the Palestinians and supportive of the US and Israel. He informed me that while in absolute numbers, mosque attendance in Canada has dropped since Sept. 11, those who continue to attend are fervent in their devotion to jihad against the Western world.
That is, the Muslims who have been forced from the organized Canadian Muslim community are those who believe in Muslim integration in the West while those who remain within that community are radical separatists who cannot abide their pro-Western Muslim brethren.
My friend and his fellow pro-Western Muslims are doubly ostracized. Not only are they rejected by their fellow Muslims who decry their denunciations of jihad, they are also rejected by the intellectual and cultural elites in their countries who insist on apologizing for jihadists in the name of multiculturalism and anti-racism.
The depth of my friend's isolation was made clear this weekend when, in the wake of the arrests of the Canadian jihad cell, Luc Portelance, the CSIS assistant director of operations told his countrymen, "It is important to know that this operation in no way reflects negatively on any specific community, or ethno-cultural group in Canada."
Think about that statement in the light of all the information available. Of course, this jihadist activity reflects negatively on Muslims. Just as in a family, with a murderer or, for example, organized criminal gang activity on the part of one member of the family, that leads others to look more closely at the whole family in case the problem runs throughout the family or they are involved. So Canadians look more closely at all Muslims to see if they can figure out which are friends and which are foes. It is common sense in the interest of self-preservation. It may be unfortunate for the really peaceable ones, as opposed to the faux "peaceful ones", but it is a fact of life. Just as I would rush a child away from friendship with an organized criminal gang member, all of us look more carefully at the Muslims in our midst, trying to assure ourselves that the one in question doesn't hate our whole way of life, our freedoms, our democracy, to see which ones are safe with which to continue as trusted friends. I would suggest that any other reaction would be tantamount to being a fool. That does not mean that all Muslims are potential jihadists; it does mean that Muslims had better start to clean up their own religious community before demanding that we non-Muslim Canadians blind ourselves to a potential reality. We are simply being prudent. While Muslims are at it, they could stop screaming "racists" and "backlash" at us. Memo to MSM, note that.
FOR ITS part, the Canadian Islamic Congress (whose leader, Mohamed Elmasry has openly stated his view that all Israeli citizens are legitimate targets for terrorist murder), attacked Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper for what it referred to as his decision to "paint today's arrests as a battle between 'us' and 'them.'" The CIC alleged that "Such statements put all Canadian Muslims in great danger," and demanded that the Canadian government fund "legitimate academic research to diagnose this serious social problem [of Canadian Muslims waging war against their country] and provide scientific solutions to it."
Mr. Elmasry, cut the bilge! It is not everyone's social problem. The problem is one of Muslims worldwide. Clean up your own house yourselves! It isn't Hindus nor Buddhists nor Jews hatching plots to kill our Prime Minister, bomb Parliament, CSIS and the CBC (The CBC? It might be poetic justice considering how CBC Pravda has abased itself in its coverage of all terrorist atrocities so as not to offend Muslims ... and I must suppress a ... oh, never mind.)
Justifications for the actions of Western born and raised jihadists - and indeed for all jihadists from Osama bin Laden down - like that published by the Telegraph are of course par for the course. As author Bruce Bower exhaustively demonstrates in his book While Europe Slept: How Radical Islam is Destroying the West from Within, there exists a unity of purpose between Islamic extremists and Western elites in Europe and throughout the world. Both sides wish to hide the fact that Islamists seek to dominate the Western world while painting the US and Israel as the greatest threats to international security.
There seems to be no limit to the willingness of Western elites to justify jihadist acts of war against their societies. The Telegraph's apology for the Canadian jihadist terror group came at the same time as Britain's counter-terror forces were conducting a desperate search for a chemical bomb they fear was built by two British born terrorists who were also arrested on Friday in London. The fact that Britain's own jihadists were planning to attack Londoners with sarin gas made no dent in the Telegraph's willingness to make excuses for radical Islamic warriors.
THIS PATTERN of collaborative dissimulation between leftist Western elites and jihadists manifested itself last week in Winnipeg, Canada. There, as the Ontario 17 steadily advanced their plans of war, Muslims in Manitoba launched an attack against a film that exposes the nature of the global jihad against the West. Last Monday and Tuesday the documentary film Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West launched its Canadian premiere in the city. (It will be premiering in Israel at Hebrew University on June 14.)
Obsession, was produced by the media watch group Honest Reporting. It effectively shows the depth of the hatred and indoctrination to jihad that is taking place worldwide. Interweaving clips from Arab television, recordings of mosque incitement, interviews with extraordinarily brave Muslim heroes like The Jerusalem Post's Khaled Abu Toameh and renowned historians such as Sir Martin Gilbert, Professor Robert Wistrich, and Daniel Pipes, the film seeks to fill the void left by the Western media and academia to alert regular citizens to the reality of the threat that jihadist ideology presents to their freedom.
Search: Shahina Siddiqui , hate propaganda , the refusal of Western elites to acknowledge
Canadians Against Suicide Bombing (CANASB)
Support Canadian Bill S-206 against suicide bombing Posted by mmaxx on 09:46:25 2006/06/04
Senator Jerry Grafstein, seconded by Senator Hugh Segal, tabled Senate Bill S-206 in April to cover suicide bombing as terrorism in the Criminal Code. Other Senators, including General Romeo Dallaire and Art Eggleton, support it and you can also help this Bill to pass.
[....] We expect Senate Committee hearings within the next few weeks for Bill S-206. It will need support from as many Canadians as possible to pass in the Senate and move into the House of Commons. Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day and other Conservatives support CANASB but they need public pressure to convince the Government, which has other priorities, to support it.
You can see news about the Bill, the Senate speeches, our new supporters like Major General Lewis MacKenzie, and other important items in our redesigned web site in the Breaking New and Events pages.
If you have not already sent us your support for Bill S-206 please offer support through our web site, www.canasb.ca, which will forward your messages to the Prime Minister, Senators and MPs.
*Bill S-206 is the same as Bill S-43, which died when the election was called.
Canadians Against Suicide Bombing
http://
www.canasb.ca/
Box 54509, 1771 Avenue Rd. Toronto Ont. M5M 4N5
Email canasb@canasb.ca. Web site www.canasb.ca
In Reply to: The US connection posted by Canoe News -- Toronto mayor says he was warned months ago homegrown terrorist cell may exist Gregory Bonnell, CP, June 03, 2006. Posted by Tom Beck on 08:43:23 2006/06/04
Re: David Harris Interviews on Jihad Threat in Canada Posted by Al Gordon on 08:51:22 2006/06/03 -- In Reply to: Re: Canada's Homegrown Terrorists posted by Stewart Bell in National Post
David Harris, CCD Senior Fellow for National Security, was interviewed recently by CTV on the catastrophic failure of our security agencies to screen immigrants from terror-exporting nations such as Pakistan and Afghanistan, and the deadly phenomenon of homegrown terrorists such as the Muslim British citizens who slaughtered London commuters on 7/7, 2005.
May 31 2006 - CTV Canada AM interviews David Harris on Canada's Immigration security collapse & homegrown terrorists
May 31 2006 - CTV Newsnet interviews David Harris on the identified risk of homegrown terrorists and the risk of a London 7/7 bombing in Canada
ALWAYS THE BEHEADING WITH THESE PEOPLE: [....] June 06, 2006
The terrorist fame game
Obviously, these 17 jihadi wannabes thought that they could win eternal recognition for their butchery. However, the only name of the infamous Sept. 11th terrorist bombers readily remembered is Mohammed Atta. His face will remain always the poster boy for the religious psychopath. His dead-eyed countenance burns into your psyche. I suspect that our Canadian boys wanted that notoriety for themselves. Thousands of their fellow citizens dead to decorate their resumees. And, ultimately for what? The advancement of fundamentalist Islam as the saving grace for mankind? To add the dreaded "Afganistan" component as an excuse is to say that these kids really wanted the Taliban to reclaim the country, with all the attendant barbaric attitudes. Maybe they did. Hell, why not give Iraq back to Saddam and the Baathists also. Of course that would mean that that their heroic foreign jihadis would have been liquidated immediately ... Saddam not putting much stock in radical ideology. But that wrinkle has not been thought out yet. Whatever. Those damed boozy Kurds and infidel Shi'ites would have been eliminated. Allah akbar! [Allah-Hu-Akbar]
Time will reveal what their twisted message was about. The illogic of it will be depressingly familiar however. Hopefully, they will have many years in prison to think about their real motivations. Meanwhile the bunker mentality of the Canadian Islamic community will be shaken to its core. Their time has come to step forward and declare their allegiance to Canadian values, or their implacable hatred of them. We will all be watching closely. Ardent multiculturalists also can afford to do some navel gazing into how their "mosaic vision" all went horribly wrong.
© Bud Talkinghorn
Might I suggest, Bud, that their adherence to multiculturalism is only overshadowed by their allegiance to political correctness as a way to prevent Canadians' admitting to consciousness the reality and then speaking out the truth about what their intelligence tells them. Hate crimes legislation was the cap to all that. It needs to be tossed; truth is necessary to protect Canadians ... now. NJC
1944 D-Day June 6, posted by Tinsnips
On this day in 1944, Supreme Allied Commander General Dwight D. Eisenhower gives the go-ahead for largest amphibious military operation in history: Operation Overlord, code-named D-Day, the Allied invasion of northern France.
By daybreak, 18,000 British and American parachutists were already on the ground. At 6:30 a.m., American troops came ashore at Utah and Omaha beaches. At Omaha, the U.S. First Division battled high seas, mist, mines, burning vehicles-and German coastal batteries, including an elite infantry division, which spewed heavy fire. Many wounded Americans ultimately drowned in the high tide. British divisions, which landed at Gold, and Sword beaches, and Canadian troops, landing at Juno beach, also met with heavy German fire, but by the end of the day they were able to push inland. [....]
D Day Museum resource posted by Winnie
Total Allied casualties on D-Day are estimated at 10,000, including 2500 dead. British casualties on D-Day have been estimated at approximately 2700. The Canadians lost 946 casualties. The US forces lost 6603 men. Note that the casualty figures for smaller units do not always add up to equal these overall figures exactly, however (this simply reflects the problems of obtaining accurate casualty statistics). [....]
June 9, 2006: Bud Talkinghorn & Political Correctness
When the shadow falls on political correctness--the terrorism debate
For a while I have followed the writings of Irshad Manji. Unfortunately, even for the most educated Muslim readers of The Globe and Mail she is haram, hence taboo. She is a lesbian, you see. I suspect she may have some hidden support from her sisterhood, however. She has, experience, first hand experience of the Islamic mentality. Despite death threats for her outspoken criticism of the more retrograde aspects of Islam, she perseveres. A mouthy dyke Islamic woman--what an abomination! Recently she related in a Globe and Mail article (June 6 A-section -- see below) how she stumbled on a Muslim prayer session at the University of Toronto. The leader was openly advocating jihad against the West. When she reported this to the university administration, they did nothing. Their august advice was that the Charter allowed even this sedition--but not derogatory statements against gays or visible minorities of course. This open call to murder was relegated to minor status. Free speech, you understand. The administration had to draw the line somewhere. [Note: they may advocate what Bud has mentioned but we must not utter anything negative against any Islamist activity that would upset Muslims. Then we are called racists who are partaking in backlash. NJC]
Now, take this line of reasoning to the strip mall mosque/ Islamic educational center and you have the same moral blindness from authorities. For years, hardcore Wahhabi imams have been imported to give "religious" instruction to impressionable Islamic-Canadian youth. Channel these youths' hormonal rush to have sex, and their need to find a personal identity and you have the setting for fanatical devotion to an supremist ideology. It overrides their natural youthful inclinations and focuses their minds on some future idyllic goal. It might be the 72 virgins, a purified Islam, or the pride of place amongst the martyrs of jihad.
Try as we might, we can never forget the names of Klebold and Harris--(At least some of us cannot). Their mindset was almost as demonic as these youths--just in the service of a different delusion. It was a nihilistic fantasy, just in a minor key. Nevertheless, the same incubus seems to be loose in today's world. Our youth are fed a non-stop diet of mass murder through movies, TV, and the ultraviolent, hands-on video games like Grand Theft Auto. For these Islamic youths, the news of al-Qaeda's latest slaughter in Iraq and the Scarlet Pimpernel-like figure of al-Zarqawi--pre his demise--has obviously created a fascination with attacking the infidels. How much more exciting to play the real game of "Death to the Unbeliever".
Irshad Manji has shown us how an unenlightened religious vision can gain adherence amongst disafflected Islamic youngsters. And how we have allowed Canada to blinker itself from this on-going radicalization? We need more Muslim voices like hers.
© Bud Talkinghorn
Excellent
Irshad Manji: Blaming the rest of the world Print Edition 06/06/06 Page A17
Three years ago, as writer-in-residence at the University of Toronto, I was putting the final touches on my book, The Trouble with Islam Today. One afternoon, I took a break to stretch my legs. Strolling past the debates room in the student centre, I saw mounds of shoes and realized it must be time for ''jummah'' prayers -- the communal worship in which devout Muslims participate every Friday. The place was packed with men, mostly young, many wearing logos of local sports teams.
It is behind a firewall.
The official website of Irshad Manji, author of The Trouble with Islam -- . At the World Economic Forum in January, ... Let's look at ourselves for a moment and stop complaining and blaming the other all the time. ...
Irshad Manji - Islam and Respect for other religions
Simon & Schuster: The Caged Virgin: An Emancipation Proclamation ... I find myself in good company: Salman Rushdie, Irshad Manji, ... habit of blaming themselves for the ills of the world, while seeing the rest of the world ...
June 9, 2006: Link Correction & Development
There is a link error May 20, 2006: #1 Updated -&- May 23, 06 East Coast Development Links
Scroll to: Irvings' Canaport LNG terminal & Companies Involved
Strange how errors occur: I found [&] inserted and a link had changed to this which is incorrect:
http://
frosthitstherhubarb.blogspot.com/
www.cnw.ca/en/releases/archive
/May2006/17/c6804.html
I have copied the post with the two articles from my files with the link corrected.
Canaport(TM) LNG Canaport(TM) LNG Partnership Limited is a partnership between Irving Oil Limited and Repsol YPF. Canaport(TM) LNG is to begin operation as ... CNW Telbec, 17 May 2006. news release.
http://
www.cnw.ca/en/releases
/archive/May2006/17/c6804.html
Attention Business Editors: Canaport(TM) LNG reaches two key milestones -- EPC contracts awarded and pipeline agreements reached 17 May 2006, news release
http://
www.cnw.ca/en/releases/
archive/May2006/17/c6725.html
SAINT JOHN, NB, May 17 /CNW/ - Canaport(TM) LNG, the partnership between Repsol YPF and Irving Oil, today announced that it has awarded the on-shore and off-shore Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) contracts and issued the final notice to proceed for the construction of the first new liquefied natural gas (LNG) receiving terminal on the East Coast of North America in decades. Repsol also announced this week that it has completed the agreements to transport natural gas from the Canaport LNG Terminal to markets in Canada and the Northeast US via the Brunswick Pipeline and an expansion of the Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline system in the US.
SNC-CENMC, G.P., a partnership between SNC-Lavalin Inc., Canada's largest engineering and construction firm, and Saipem S.p.A. of Milan, Italy, was awarded the Engineering, Procurement, Construction (EPC) contract for onshore facilities and jetty topsides, providing full procurement and supervisory responsibilities for the onshore portion of the project.
Kiewit-Weeks-Sandwell Partnership, a consortium of Peter Kiewit Sons Co of St. John's, Newfoundland & Labrador; Weeks Marine of Cranford, New Jersey; and Sandwell Engineering of Vancouver, British Columbia, was awarded the EPC contract for the terminal's offshore facilities, including the receiving pier. [. . . . ]
There is a bit of information on each company.
Would MP Paul Zed (who married into the Irving family) have had anything to do with this? Would his being in Opposition now put a spanner in ....... how things have always worked?
Memory Lane
More information on development and the impacts on Canada: FHTR April 17-22, 2005
Search:
Canada's Immigration System -- In Action
Casino Connections -- A lavish feast to signify the reemergence of the 14K Triad in Macau will have ripple effects in B.C. Jul 8, 2004.
Casino Connections Part 2
UNSCAM - Natural Gas - Pricing - Pipeline - Tarsands - Atlantic Accord - Oil - Husky - Newfoundland Labrador -- [Scroll to] Oil, Offshore Newfoundland Labrador, Atlantic Accord, Technip, Husky & More
Kiewit [one of the companies mentioned in the article above]
June 9, 06: Video clips & more
Via The Death of Multiculturalism? BCNU2, 6/07/2006 -- ISLAMOPHOBIA: RACISM? OR REALISM? CBC NEWS: THE NATIONAL PRESENTS THE ENEMY WITHIN TWO-PART SERIES AIRS TUESDAY, JUNE 6 AND WEDNESDAY JUNE 7 AT 10 P.M. ON CBC TELEVISION
One link to a video clip follows; the other was posted yesterday.
CBC The National June 8, 06: Clip of a Sufi Muslim who knew the Toroto terrorists who prayed while wearing military fatigues and blamed the problems on the Saudis spread of Wahhabism
Click on the watch National online
It's at 7:55 minute mark
This is ironic -- from the group associated in Canada with Mohammed Elmasry (CIC) who is notorious for his statements about Jews to Michael Coren on television this year. Note the connections between CAIR and CIC (Canadian Islamic Congress)
Muslim groups call on PM to support youth summit Last Updated Thu, 08 Jun 2006 14:14:20 EDT, CBC News
Canadian Muslim organizations are calling on Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty to hold a summit on youth extremism.
The Canadian Council on American-Islamic Relations, known as CAIR-CAN, hopes the summit will be held by the end of June. [....]
"They need a safe, constructive way to express their dissent instead of falling prey to people who play on their vulnerabilities," said Shahina Siddiqui. [....]
I have written before of Shahina Siddiqui's interview when she was supposed to answer caller's questions about Islam on CBC, totally useless from the point of view of viewers' getting answers to urgent questions about Islam, but a great propaganda exercise given a venue by CBC. I believe I have posted a link to it within the last week so search: Shahina Siddiqui on Frost Hits the Rhubarb.
Memory Lane
The Left ♥ CAIR, MPAC, et al. August 19, 2003 -- or here
Scroll down for a photograph of Mohammed Elmasry.
March 5, 2004 update: In an undated statement, the far-left Tides Foundation announces that is is funding CAIR's "Interfaith Coalition Against Hate Crimes" project with the ostensible aim to promote peaceful co-existence between Muslims and non-Muslims and decrease tolerance for anti-Muslim hate crimes.
[....] May 12, 2006 update: Mohamed Elmasry of the Canadian Islamic Congress addressed the Marxism-2006 conference in Toronto and told the assembled leftists:Now, for the first time in history, the political left is working with conservative Muslims on issues of social justice, with the long-term goal of building a world that lives by peace, through justice. Communists, Marxists, socialists, and nationalists are working with civil libertarians, liberals, and conservatives to achieve this urgent goal together.
Muslim World League-Al Haramain - Saudi Wahabist groups fund terror and flourish in Canada
The Usual Suspects: Photos of MWL -Al Haramain minions at work & play : MWL speakers list includes Florida linked Islamists
August 16, 2004
MIM: Saudi Arabia in Canada:
The Muslim World League funds international terror in America's backyard.
http:/
www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/242
There are articles and photos, as well as lists of prominent members. Search: From Canada , Brothers , Aly Hindy , Mohammed Elmasry, Waterloo , Sisters
THE TERROR RAIDS: Colin Freeze: How the police watched the plan unfold -- Fahim Ahmad group's alleged 'emir' Globe & Mail, posted on June 7, 06
[....] It has been called a made-in Canada plot against Canadian targets, but this is only half the story. It's alleged the group's emir, or leader, was Fahim Ahmad, and that he was in touch with shadowy terrorist figures in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Britain.
[....] According to Aly Hindy of the Salaheddin Islamic Centre, Mr. Ahmad blamed constant spying by CSIS for forcing him into criminal activity.
In August, 2005, two young men were stopped at the Canada-U.S. border and searched. Authorities found three handguns, boxes of ammunition and even a bullet stashed in a sock.
The men, Mohammed Dirie and Yasim Mohamed, told authorities they bought the weapons from a drug addict in Columbus, Ohio, for "protection" from criminals. They were sentenced to two years each.
The smuggling incident was brought to the attention of the RCMP-led Integrated National Security Enforcement Team.
They noted that the car intercepted at the border was a rental. And, according to the Crown dossier, the credit card used to obtain the vehicle belonged to one Fahim Ahmad.
It was at that point that authorities began to regard the case as much, much more than a gun-smuggling incident. [....]
You decide for yourself about this. From a friend -- and thanks, R.
When one dandelion plant appears in my lawn, it is a foregone conclusion that in subsequent years there will be many more, and if not dealt with, will obliterate my lawn.
Regular application of a herbicide fixes the problem.
Can we equate Islamofacists to dandelions?
A link from one who commented on my post "June 7, 06: CBC explores multiculturalism's demise" leads to a discussion of immigration and another side to the positive spin we've been forcefed by our propaganda organs. There are links from our own government's studies and other links.
It might be worth looking at some of the links; for example:
http://
www.cic.gc.ca/ENGLISH/research/papers/education/education-r.html
"The incidence of personal income tax filing for Canadians 20 years of age and over in 1995 was roughly 91%. The comparable figure for immigrants 18 years of age and over as captured in the IMDB was 57%."
So they don't pay taxes that'll fire the economy
http://
www.cic.gc.ca/ENGLISH/research/papers/education/education-h.html
"14.3% of immigrant taxfilers landed since 1980 reported welfare benefits as an income source in 1995, as compared to a 9.6% incidence for all Canadians."
so people here 15 years are 50% more likely to be on welfare, no wonder we need government housing.
http://
www.cic.gc.ca/ENGLISH/research/papers/education/education-e.html
"12% to 18% reported unemployment insurance benefits"
[....] http://
www.cic.gc.ca/ENGLISH/research/papers/education/education-c.html
"In 1995, those with 0 to 9 years of education accounted for 18%"
18% of the adults we bring in have no high school?
Insane I tell you these are adults over 18 all ready for welfare.
[....] We do make sure that when crimes are reported that statistics on race are missing so we can know that in say Norway that Muslims carry out xxxxx% of all gang rapes but in Canada until it hits someone you know the press are not allowed to tell you under the anti truth laws of Canada.
http://
www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=20646
Jobs, Jobs, Jobs: Go to the federal job website they will post jobs where white males are not allowed to apply. If we needed immigration they wouldn't need to do that. [....]
Search: Foreign Certifications [sic], Canadian Demographics
I checked and this appears to come from Torpedoes Away,
http://
www.mts.net/~garyh/
From the sidebar, a few other topics which might be worth checking. I had no time to read further.
Abortion Affirmative Action Immigration The Senator of CTV HIV Daycare Kids Scandal and Waste Truth humor Yet Another Scandal Group Action National Action Council on the Status of Women Islamic Hatred Bilingualizm Amount of your taxes wasted on paying for debt UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights Canadian Violations Reasons Not To Trust The Lieberals Reload Home Page
A series of comments on Undocumented Immigrants: Where do these demonstrators get the money and time for this? BCNU2, 5/29/2006
On Sunday May 28, there were demonstrations in various Canadian cities to ease the plight of "undocumented" immigrants in Canada. You know, to recognize these folks as beneficial and necessary to the Canadian economy, and to change our laws to 1) make it easier for more immigrant workers to come to Canada, and 2) institute an amnesty so that these poor, undocumented workers can live here without fear of being discovered and deported.
Hello? Undocumented is just a fancy word for illegal. These are illegal queue jumpers who have smuggled themselves illegally into our country, and now they want to stay (surprise!) without having to go thru the onerous task of applying for landed immigrant status.
I kid you not. This lunacy actually took place in various cities this past weekend. Who do these people think they're trying to fool? If Canada brought forward an amnesty so that these undocumented AND illegal immigrants could apply to stay in Canada without having to apply outside the country, as one is supposed to do, wouldn't that send a signal to the world that all one had to do was to sneak into Canada, then announce yourself as an "undocumented immigrant" and presto! Canada will arrange to process your application for landed immigrant status, then you can apply to bring in your family under the "Family Reunification" guidelines.
This isn't just "selling the farm", it's giving it away with both hands!
Photo: "where a number of suspects were arrested on June 2 in an anti-terrorism sweep" -- Al-Rahman Islamic Centre for Islamic Education
Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West SeanMcElroy, 6/07/2006
[....] Using images from Arab TV, rarely seen in the West, Obsession reveals an ‘insider's view' of the hatred the Radicals are teaching, their incitement of global jihad, and their goal of world domination. With the help of experts, including first-hand accounts from a former PLO terrorist, a Nazi youth commander, and the daughter of a martyred guerilla leader, the film shows, clearly, that the threat is real.
A peaceful religion is being hijacked by a dangerous foe, who seeks to destroy the shared values we stand for. The world should be very concerned.
TIMELINE OF ISLAMIST-LINKED TERROR: March 1977 - July 2004
The Islamists have pursued their battle on a variety of fronts, from sectarian violence against Coptic Christians in Egypt , to subway bombings in Paris , to attacks in Russia .
70s: 1977 1979
80s: 1981 1983 1984 1985 1988 1989
90s: 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
00s: 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
[Obsession ]
http://
www.honestreporting.com/obsession/
Shahina Siddiqui, the president of the Islamic Social Services Associations told the press, "I want the police to identify this as hate propaganda." So much for free speech, just try to declare something 'hate propaganda' and stop anyone from being able to 'choose' to view it or not. It's not hate if it's true. [....]
[....] http://tinyurl.com/r756h
[....] http://tinyurl.com/zx5v8
There is more. You won't read about it on the CBC website, I would hazard a guess.
Law no longer rules in Caledonia The Record.com
The Record: Law no longer rules in Caledonia. A group of native protesters has been flouting the law for more than two months and government just watches -- by Matt Walcoff, June 2, 2006 (Originally published May 31, 2006)
Matt Walcoff is a business reporter for The Record
[....] What is going on in Caledonia is not a noble struggle of members of an oppressed minority asserting their civil rights. This is not a 1960 sit-in at a Georgia Woolworth's lunch counter. This is a gang of militant thugs victimizing the law-abiding citizens of Haldimand County, emboldened by the timidity of a province and country paralyzed by political correctness and the fear that one of the occupiers might get hurt.
The Ontario government has responded to the crisis as if it was a teachers' strike, sending in David Peterson to negotiate. But the occupation is not a political dispute; it is a long-running criminal act.
We do not negotiate with bank robbers or drunk drivers. We arrest them and throw them in jail. If they resist? Well, that's why cops have handcuffs, nightsticks and tear-gas grenades.
I'm sure some readers still think the occupiers are the victims, automatically deserving of sympathy as people of colour fighting The Man. Those sympathizers should take note: The Six Nations radicals claim all land within six miles of the Grand River. That includes all of Waterloo, Kitchener and Cambridge. If the occupiers are able to get their way in Caledonia through violence and intimidation, you might wake up next year to find your street under occupation.
I simply do not have time for more because of other commitments ... but there is so much more of interest.
June 08, 2006
The National with Irshad Manji & Haroun Siddiqui
I could not even get this completely posted on June 8 so I have added to it (June 9). What is the problem with Blogger ... or is it a more localized, filter problem? This panel is worth watching.
The National, June 7, 06:
Click on watch The National for an online-panel with Irshad Manji and Haroun (Haroon?) Siddiqui at the 26:00 minute mark.
Prior to that, the sanctimonious Neil MacDonald does his usual knock the U.S. bit
As for CBC, they live in a world of denial and for years have been merely a Liberal propaganda machine not an objective news organization. If the CBC building were hit and there were casualties, guess who they'd blame for not stopping the attack - the security agencies - the very ones they knock, the ones they make sure are politically correct and the ones they have handcuffed so they are still understaffed and underfunded. The whole Arar publicity blitz was to keep CSIS politically correct and hence an advantage for terrorists with second guessing.
To comment, link to CBCwatch.ca
www.cbcwatch.ca/?q=node/view/1925#comment
To the CBC, note: we keep our friends close and our enemies closer ... so we watch you.
I still have commitments that prohibit my posting until later.
June 07, 2006
June 7, 06: CBC explores multiculturalism's demise
CBC explores multiculturalism's demise in Europe ... in its usual inept manner.
The National, June 6, 06 with Mark Kelly.
First Mark went to England, interviewed Muslim males in the town of Keithley (?), one of whom said he couldn't care less whether he was accepted as or considered British. Mark questioned nothing about that.
He briefly talked with the mayor I believe who tried to explain how her area had changed for the worse since the Pakistanis (Pakis) had come. Mark did not explore what had occurred nor probe deeper.
Then, the non-Muslim community representatives: Mark couldn't find a group of articulate adults to question. Instead, Mark found a group of young (teens or early twenties) men holding cans of beer outdoors -- the effect? Yobos, who were inarticulate to boot ... which they appeared to be. Perfect. Viewers were intended, I assume, to dismiss the views of these young men who would drink beer on the street as not worth probing for reasons such as "Why have you come to feel like this?". Not much reasoned questioning nor explanation there. However, it is a mistake to dismiss the inarticulate who in the end may explode with inchoate rage at what has happened. Even people who are not articulate may be right, in that they sense the problem and its source but cannot explain it well ... but that would not be explored by Mark.
Subsequently, Mark went to Holland where his object must have been to show how intolerant the Dutch are in rejecting multiculturalism.
He talked to a few, including the Dutch MP who brought in a bill, passed now, that bans the burka in public, the burka as a symbol of an in-your-face rejection of Dutch culture and an unwillingness to become Dutch, particularly in attitudes to and treatment of women. His bill may have other ramifications (which I don't remember). The only thing Mark could do was discuss how "multiculturalism" is a Canadian value and how being against it is "racism". Actually, it is not racism; it is ethnocentrism and it is not a Canadian value; it is Liberal propaganda designed to get us to keep quiet while they do as they please ... and import Liberal voters. Many of us have known for ages that as an ideal, multiculturalism leads to division, not cohesion, and is a poor way to build a country, anyway. Race has to do with colour but trot out the "R" word in Canada and it will get you out of just about anything you don't want discussed.
The idea you are to get from Mark's interview with the young beer drinkers? Canada is different and it is "racist" to speak publicly otherwise. He did not explore the idea that the burka is more than simply a piece of cloth; it is a political statement, saying as much as anything else: "I am not part of you. I do not want to fit into your society. I may be here for economic or other reasons but I am never going to integrate or to become one of you." Well, Mark, what now?
Another CBC trip wasted. Mark went with a preconceived notion of the old multiculturalism claptrap. We learned nothing from his trip. Mark is a perfect product of a Liberal/liberal education -- mouthing shibboleths without thought behind it. Your ilk with your very liberal beliefs would be the first to go to the wall if the Islamists succeed here in Canada.
First, Canadians were never asked their opinion of multiculturalism, other than its gradual rise in importance--its dominance in CBC-speak for their Liberals--came as part of what amounts to passing an omnibus bill for MP's to do what they wish, when you give your vote in an election resulting in a majority government. Canadians voted for Liberals for an overwhelming number of years, usually not cognizant of what would gradually occur here as a result. No-one spelled out the ramifications of what was gradually instigated. And so it has gone ... but along the way, no-one really canvassed us. If we voiced any objections we were tarred with the word "racist", the kiss of death to further discussion.
As a result of our stupidity and gullibility in the face of the Liberal juggernaut, undoubtedly helped by Conservatives who didn't want to be tarred with the epithet "racist", and a compliant mainstream media used to and liking the perquisites and access under the Liberals, Canada has become increasingly insecure. Mainstream media such as the CBC do not want multiculturalism and its failures explored. Why, the natives might git uppity! Question their elites, their betters.
NJC ... somewhat exercised, again, to say the least.
Will no-one rid us of the CBC? ... Or at least inject a lively brain?
June 06, 2006
June 6, 2006
Update: I had published this, or I thought so. There have been problems but I tried several times. I hit publish and once I could see this update all right but it did not show in the blog a few minutes ago. I shall try again and if it doesn't work ... a sunny afternoon ... perfect for a drink and I shall just ... drown out the cares of the world ... forget whether anyone sees my mea culpas. World, you will be sorry ........
My post on FHTR May 11, 2006: #2 -- A comment and answer from a reader that I would like readers to note:
I had asked
"Is this Karim Remtulla the same person as a U of T Grad Studies doctoral student of that name, or is the name an unfortunate coincidence?
[ http://www.sgs.utoronto.ca/english/currentcourses.asp ]"
As of June 6, 06:
Someone placed a comment at the end of that post on May 11 and I want people to notice it so I am repeating it here in my own words.
Anonymous said that the Karim Remtulla of U of T Grad Studies, a doctoral student, is NOT the Karim Remtulla mentioned in the article above, the one facing charges -- so having the same name is an unfortunate coincidence.
I welcome corrections or added information that anyone cares to send via comments; the problem is in getting them to readers' attention. For example, some posts are so old I can no longer update on the post in question. Sorry. I was able to update the May 11 post but ...
While I'm at it, I might as well apprise readers of this, so far. I have made three errors of fact and one of not searching further--as opposed to making comments which may prove right, precient, or wrong--comments which I have tried to correct or I have tried to ameliorate the negative effects by posting updates.
1. The Aga Khan was not born in India; he was born in Paris or Geneva, according to the latest information which I have posted within the last month on this website. The post concerned a book on the Aga Khan.
2. Refugees do not get as much as I was led to believe and I have posted a correction based on an article in The Star but I have forgotten the link. The important thing is that they get a one-time stipend to allow them to settle in, then the money they get for living is relatively low, perhaps inadequate. I shall try to find the link later.
3. I posted on crime rising in December and referred to statistics; I also referred to an article from last summer, and someone took issue with it. The person suggested I don't know what I am talking about. The writer sounded knowledgeable about how statistics on crime are compiled in the US vs Canada. I tried to update this in January. (Link later)
4. Someone wrote to bring a post on the WWF out of Australia up to date. (some time in May or April. I'll find the link when I have time.)
That is the end of my mea culpas for today. Considering that I receive few plaudits and usually only the criticisms, I have a rather thick hide -- which may or may not be 'a good thing'.
End of update and corrections information
I have other commitments so I shall not post much, if anything for a bit.
Note, web links become corrupted rapidly in this best of all possible Canada. Get 'em while they're hot!
A few points and links
I am furious at the slant that CBC, in particular, is giving the work of our security forces in trying to protect us. CBC has bent overboard in trying to discredit our government and the security services' work; in fact, (imho) CBC is giving a sympathetic hearing to any Muslim apologist available, while emphasizing that it is not Islam, just some bad influence (wait for one or two to take the fall for the others, the "good boys"). Our security forces are doing a great job while our mainstream media, generally, undermine them. Thanks to those who are protecting us.
As for the media that work against us and them, Canadians should not have to pay for this bias.
When will CBC, along with any other media which are reporting by screaming "racism" or "backlash", start questioning? Ask why these members of the Muslim community--the Muslim community whose greatest fear is backlash, it seems--are ready to kill the rest of us -- and probably even a few peaceable Muslims in the neighbourhood?
Where were the immediate calls by Muslims to get rid of the cancer spreading in their religious community? Before they wail about a backlash.
When will Muslims start policing their own fonts of jihadist rhetoric, their mosques, perhaps not all, but you already know which ones? Stop importing Wahhabism while you're at it.
The same thing happened with Question Period in the House of Commons yesterday -- anything but questioning deeply into the terrorist threat in Canada. When are the Opposition going to research the terrorist threat and then inform Canadians fully, then support paying for enough manpower for our security services to address the problem?
Memo to Minister Stockwell Day, many of us want you to pay more for security, defence, and stop funding the divisive multicultural programs; put money into being Canadian! Into learning about what being a Canadian means, our history, our values, and our requirements of refugees and immigrants if they want to be Canadians.
Caveat: I emphasize CBC's part because I often it because it plays in another room as I work and I don't always want to take the time to change channels. Besides, it is always good to know what the enemy and propaganda organ for the Liberals is saying.
To the good journalists out there who are doing a credible job, that was not meant for you. Keep up the good work.
There are a few webpages to which I would direct readers:
Canada Free Press June 6, 2006
Scroll down the above site for more; here are two articles worth looking at to start:
The truth about terrorism Judi McLeod, June 6, 06, CFP
www.canadafreepress.com/2006/cover060606.htm
Missing from Kingston terror suspects in penitentiary Judi McLeod & Doug Hagmann, Monday, June 5, 2006 CFP
www.canadafreepress.com/2006/cover060506.htm
Search: Al-Rahman (Islamic) Centre for Islamic Education
Saudi Aramco World : Indexes : Subjects -- a massive compilation
EDUCATION—ISLAMIC. Books For A New World, Clark, A., JF 98: 32-37. The Islamic Legacy of Timbuktu, ... KING FAISAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH AND ISLAMIC STUDIES ...
Lists of Islamic centres Toronto Connecting Pakistani Canadians around the GTA" [Greater Toronto Area] -- Masjids and Islamic Centers in GTA
Islamic Organizations in GTA
Islamic Schools/Colleges in GTA
http://
www.pakcommunity.ca/islam.jsp
http://
www.google.com/search?q=cache:4b1kj3
tNw9IJ:www.pakcommunity.ca/islam.jsp+Al-Rahman+Islamic+Centre+
for+Islamic+Education&hl=en&gl=ca&ct=clnk&cd=8
Lorne Gunter writes in the National Post: ... Do we really think jihadis want a tolerant, multicultural world? Tolerance is a Western ideal, and the Islamists hate Western ideals. This radicalized minority within Islam doesn’t seek multiculturalism. Their goal is monoculturalism: one world under radical Islam.... 5 June 2006
We could let Muslims practise sharia law within their own community and guarantee Muslim students and employees set-aside space at schools and work for their five-times-daily prayers, and still the jihadis among us would conspire to buy explosives and plot to blow up Canadian targets until we all agreed to live under sharia law and worship Allah at dawn, mid-morning, noon, mid-afternoon and dusk.
Radical Muslims are not interested in what we will let them do. "You do your thing and I’ll do mine" is a Western notion. Jihadis are motivated by a desire to make everyone else in the world bow to Muhammad, too. [....]
Andrew C. McCarthy on At War & Media on National Review Online - Strike the word 'Muslim' Thanks R for this.
RCMP seize 20 tonnes of hashish off the coast of Africa -- An elaborate sting operation off the coast of Africa has prevented 20 tonnes of hashish from entering Canada, the RCMP said Monday.
June 02, 2006: Stephen Taylor -- "Joe Volpe strongarms the Internet and erodes freedom of speech in Canada".
Updates on the YouthForVolpe.ca website.
Yesterday, a Joe Volpe parody site went up called YouthForVolpe.ca which lampooned the Liberal leadership candidate's drug money (ahem pharmaceutical donations) from children of Apotex execs. [....]
The new site, as I have mentioned, is YouthForVolpeNoLibs.ca, if I have remembered correctly.
I think this leads to the complete article which is excellent: Christie Blatchford: So Islam has nothing to do with terror, eh?
http://
www.judeoscope.ca
/breve.php3?id_breve=1658
'It's not over' -- More terror arrests expected June 5, 06, National Post, and more links from it follow.
Full Story
http://www.canada.com/
nationalpost/story.html?id=bb26
33ca-0f56-46a4-9591-b087e32be896&k=89471
Suspects grew up in Toronto
http://
www.canada.com/nationalpost/
story.html?id=2e8f5170-6f5d-451a-857f-938d3b93d532
Transit protected: minister
http://
www.canada.com/nationalpost/
story.html?id=2918b873-a2ef-4d75-8937-2864e2145336
U.S. praises Canada for bust
http://www.canada.com/
nationalpost/story.ht
ml?id=433cae0d-8347-4f1c-b9c9-3f56959bf89a
Rural residents describe camp
http://
www.canada.com/nationalpost/
story.html?id=9ee0b6bc-6d12-4fde-bd13-85d1cd6b71c5
Muslim leaders divided
http://
www.canada.com/nationalpost/
story.html?id=29a5f8eb-d75b-4141-b94d-1541cf990733
Global National reports
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/index.html#
Muslim reaction
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/index.html#
Note: Muslim reaction has been covered by CBC, ad nauseam. Wahhabism was actually mentioned on CBC on the national news last evening. If the mothercorps has noticed, it is probably too late to start learning. Check anyway.
'It's not over' -- More terror arrests expected Mike Blanchfield and Allan Woods, CanWest, June 05, 2006
http://
www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=b
b2633ca-0f56-46a4-9591-b087e32be896&k=89471
[Senator and chair of the security committee] Kenny said he is happy with Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper's plans to add 1,000 new RCMP officers, but that 3,000 are needed to recover from the damage done by Liberal cost-cutting measures in the 1990s.
In Washington, Wilson was forced to defend Canada's record on domestic security before an American television audience, when CNN played the ambassador a clip of New York Rep. Peter King, the Republican chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives homeland security committee, lambasting Canada's record fighting terrorism.
"There's a large al-Qaida presence in Canada E [sic] a disproportionate number of al-Qaida in Canada because of their very liberal immigration laws," [New York Rep. Peter] King said, before taking a shot at the former Liberal government. "The previous government, quite frankly, in Canada, I don't think was tough enough as far as going after terrorists."
[....] Kenny said Canada's security apparatus, be it the RCMP or CSIS, faces serious deficiencies in battling the emerging threat of homegrown terrorists. All of those arrested Saturday were either born in Canada, or raised in Canada from a young age.Days before the arrests, Kenny's Senate committee heard testimony from Jack Hooper, CSIS deputy director of operations, about the growing threat of homegrown terrorists and the problems battling it.
Kenny said it requires luck "and it requires an intelligence capacity we simply don't have."
Kenny also said it requires the help of particular ethnic communities.
Search: Al-Rahman Islamic Centre in Mississauga
"He speaks out," Mr. Hindy said of Mr. Jamal. "He said we should not let the Khadrs be isolated and we should help them."
Discussing the allegations against the suspects, Mr. Hindy said, "Three tonnes of fertilizer would be delivered to where? These guys are living in townhouses and apartments, in the city," he told The New York Times. "Now I'm hearing this three tonnes may have been organized by the police. Maybe the police tried to frame them, I don't know. There's a lot of uncertainty and I don't think this evidence, when they get to court, will hold up."
[....] Mr. Hindy said four others picked up in the sweep attended his Kennedy Road mosque, including Mr. Ahmad, Jahmaal James, 23, Steven Vikash Chand, 25 -- a Hindu convert to Islam who changed his name to Abdul Shakur -- and one of five young offenders charged with taking part in the alleged plot.
"I am sure, 100%, none of these guys would do anything in Canada," Mr. Hindy said, adding he was aware some of the men from both mosques were being tailed by CSIS and the RCMP.
[....] At the Al-Rahman centre they found a more appealing message and spent time listening to Mr. Jamal. "The Al-Rahman centre was an extremist hub but not a terror extreme, just extreme in their interpretation," said the man. [....]
Ali/Aly Hindy certainly gets around -- seems to know all the important people.
With the exception of two men aged 43 and 30, the alleged terrorists are all in their teens and early 20s. They include men of Somali, Egyptian, Jamaican, and Trinidadian origin. All are residents of Canada and "for the most part" all are Canadian citizens, police said. NatPost, May 5, 06
Memory Lane: FHTR week of July 24, 2005 Over a week, there are several items. You'll just have to scroll.
To give an idea of the content that might be of interest (I have no time to include the links):
Aly Hindy was not invited and he's piqued. . . That's the same Aly Hindy, the subject of this: Imam warns Ottawa to back off Muslims and then, there is "Re: Elmasry's fatwa": Mohammed Elmasry: "Muslims told to integrate politically" -- "You have to vote. Voting counts." -- Will voting Liberal ensure no politically incorrect questioning by CSIS about sleeper cells or associations or suspect individuals that might disturb Muslims? No suggestion that Muslims should be co-operating with CSIS without urging? James Rusk, CIC, July 23, 05 posted by Al Gordon of whom Gordon writes: [....]
CAIR Founded by "Islamic Terrorists"? Daniel Pipes and Sharon Chadha, FrontPageMagazine.com, July 28, 2005 -- Remove "?" for the answer. [....]
Check the connections between CAIR (US) and Mohammed Elmasry's CIC [Canadian Islamic Congress]
[....] Dissembling & Misinforming? Ah, cut to the chase: "Islam - Why Muslims Lie" -- Ali Hindy, Guarantor and Friend
Update: this goes along with a post from previously today. I posted on Dr. Ali Hindy and Dr. Mohamed Elmasry's views and activities:
"Honour", Aly Hindy, CSIS, Lying, General Hillier, Elmasry, Anomaly, Restoring the Caliphate
[....] Out of Africa, Al Hindy & Elmasry, Rosset on the UN, Zimbabwe & Mugabe
Refugees -- again
Failed hit in London tied to East Africans -- "British newspapers focused outraged headlines on the fact that each of the four had received around $7,500 a year in housing-benefit payments, and more in income support." Paul Martin (definitely not our PM), Washington Times, July 27, 05
http://
washingtontimes.com
/world/20050726-114924-2592r.htm
[....] "The long and ruinous rule of Mugabe and his cronies."
Claudia Rosset & the UN: "Ruin By Design" July 27, 05, The Wall Street Journal (Opinion Journal and European Edition)
http://
www.defenddemocracy.org/in_the_media
/in_the_media_show.htm?doc_id=287091 [....]
Via newsbeat1 -- Also, check that site for the photo of the Murragh Building after the bombing
Walid Phares on the arrests in Toronto area......
Video David Harris -- see right side for clips
More on the arrests over the weekend.....Make sure you click on the video of interview with Raheel Raza
Talkback radio will probably deal with the terrorism related arrests over the weekend -- CFRB
Montreal CJAD [ http://www.cjad.com/ ]
Toronto [ http://www.640toronto.com/ ]
June 3, 06, Tom Brodbeck - Harper not shutting any reporters out
What's really going on. -- Tom Brodbeck gives a sober, reasoned account of how it's done and why the most vociferous members of the Parliamentary Press Gallery would be piqued. -- on the old and the new systems of press scrums.
Under the old system, when the prime minister was doing a press conference, he would take questions from reporters who would shout them out to him.
In most cases, it was a dozen or two reporters yelling their respective questions in unison, sometimes to the point where the PM couldn't even understand them.
The PM, whether it was Jean Chretien or Paul Martin, would scan the crowd of reporters and choose the question he wanted to answer. Reporters who got their questions answered were usually the ones who could shout the loudest or who were the most aggressive.
Although a little unruly, the benefit of this traditional scrum was that reporters could feed off each other's questions and zero in on important, more detailed lines of questioning.
The downside is not all reporters got to ask questions, especially less aggressive ones who didn't feel comfortable getting into yelling matches with their more vociferous colleagues. [....]
David Jones: What Harper has to put up with Citizen Special, June 02, 2006
David Jones, a former American diplomat who served in Ottawa, now lives in Arlington, Virginia.
To the immense irritation of the Parliamentary Press Gallery, Prime Minister Stephen Harper has refused to play by their game rules. Having examined the "game" during the period when he was in opposition and during election campaigns, he apparently concluded that it was stacked against him. And that he would be a fool to play by its rules.
Of course those who made up the rules (the Parliamentary Press Gallery) think them fair and even-handed.
Mr. Harper has adopted the Boston politics ethos: "Don't get mad; get even." And now, from a position in which he can play the game in a manner more to his preference, he is changing the rules. Surprise! The matador, having tired of being gored, is demonstrating his mastery of riposte. [....]
To keep abreast of news almost as it happens, check Jack's Newswatch
Also: Western Standard -- and don't forget to check the Shotgun blog -- see sidebar for it
Small Dead Animals -- and search the comments for links to news items posted by maz2 -- usually useful
CanadianCoalition.org -- See sidebar for the Forum
For enjoyment: uplink: Remember these pictures? with this link: The views start a the galaxy level and end up looking at the quarks in a leaf.
http://
micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer
/java/scienceopticsu/powersof10/
There is more news today of interest but ........ well, maybe a bit, later
June 05, 2006
June 5, 06: Bud Talkinghorn -- May Day
Canadians awaken to a nightmare terrorist plot
Of course, Torontonians had images of the CN Tower crashing down on them, with CSIS headquarters in the path, thus paralyzing that essential agency. Other targets in the immediate area had the potential for massive destruction and pandmonium. Still, the shock to all of us was profound. It springs open a Pandora's Box of serious questions about what is transpiring in the Muslim population. And as much as the Islamic community and the multiculturalists try to deflect any blame, there is much to go around. These youths did not operate in total isolation, the police suggested. The round-up is still on for homegrown accomplices, facilitators and foreign connections. Needless to say, the usual spokesmen for the Islamic diaspora maintained that this was an isolated incident, thus had nothing to do with "true" peaceful Islam.
CBC's role in pumping out this message, while secretly trying to cast doubt on the entire raid. was rather obvious. One method was to yoke reportage on the Canadian terrorist cell to a possibly botched anti-terrorism raid in England. Then there was the notorious Monday interview with Ali Hindy, the radical imam from the Salaheddin Islamic Center. The CBC interviewer mostly just let Hindy rant away about the Canadian security forces, which he claimed were targeting young Muslim men for no reason. His best denunciations were "[The raids were] just so departments can justify their budgets...This is to keep George W Bush happy, that's all." The only surprise was, not that the interviewer didn't vociferously attack his illogical, paranoid interpretations--that was expected--but that Hindy didn't claim that all the arrested were actually undercover Mossad agents. To top off the "sensitive" CBC coverage, we have a Ms. Farooq lamenting the callousness of the arresting officers, who didn't allow her to have a final conversation with her arrested husband. Boo Hoo!
What the liberal establishment wants to forestall is any serious look at multiculturalism and our ultra-lax immigration/refugee polices. This "tolerant" approach has been the Holy Grail of the left. Nor do they want Canadians to link this foiled attack to the successful one in London. Both suspected ring leaders were "youth counsellors". As well a poll commissioned by The Telegraph, just two days after the London bombings, showed that the majority of British Muslims hated British culture; a large per centage would not have turned in the perpetrators if they had know of the plan, and a scary minority would have actively aided the bombers. A similar poll of Canadian-Muslim viewpoints could be equally eye opening. Where are the urgent cries from our Muslims to disband the virulent terror blog sites, or to investigate the anti-western rhetoric flowing out of their mosques and education (indoctrination) centers? Or even for a call to Muslims to end their self-imposed exile from mainstream Canadian attitudes? What we are getting instead is this self-serving pap about Canadian racism and Islamophobia. Meanwhile Fahim Bukari, the Director of the Missasauga Islamic Center admitted that Qayyam Jamal, a volunteer there, was a close friend of five of the arrested youths. He had been warned by numerous people, including a Liberal MP, that the man was dangerous radical. Bukari admitted he wasn't surprised by the raid and Mr. Jamal's role in it. Yet no attempt was made to ban him from the center. Rather suspicious behaviour for a director who claims to be a moderate.
Come to think of it, I've rarely heard any overt criticism of the worldwide atrocites committed in Allah's name. What do they really think about the mutual slaughter of Shia and Sunnis in Iraq? I always find it disturbing when I hear that these young monsters may have been motivated by Western actions in Afganistan and Iraq. That seems to suggest that the majority thinks that Saddam's regime should have been left intact, or that the terrorist-aiding Taliban should be lauded. Does Islamofascism fit their mindset more than Canada's democratic model? Where, as a Sunni imam, does Aly Hindy stand on the latest mass murder in Iraq? In that ambush, the Sunni al-Qaeda separated the Iraqi bus passengers into Sunni and Shi'ites, then executed all the Shi'ites, to the chant of "On behalf of Islam, today we will dig a mass grave for you." That the alleged terrorists here cannot make the distinction between the goals of the occupying coalition forces and those of these blood-thirsty thugs is truly frightening. When issues such as these are openly aired, I will start to have more trust in our Muslim neighbours. The ball is in their court now.
© Bud Talkinghorn
Unity and the CBC
The Globe and Mail (Thursday, June 1, 06, R1-2) published an article by Konrad Yakabuski which showed the furor that erupted in Radio-Canada, the Quebec wing of the CBC following this. Guy Fournier, the chairman of the CBC board, had declared that Radio-Canada had become too Quebec-centric -- as though Canada didn't exist. In the past, Trudeau and Chretien called it "a hotbed of separatists". From evidence during the last decades, those sentiments seem to be borne out as a truism. For the privilege of having separatism promoted, the Canadian taxpayer shells out $300 million. That sum, by the way is almost a third of what CBC claims is the total of what it gets from the government. Rather generous subsidization for a province that doesn't make up a quarter of the nation's population. Guy Fournier maintains that as a public institution their mandate is to foster unity--not hidebound regionalism or, God forbid, separatism.
The Radio Canada folk say "******" as, in 1991 the Broadcasting Act was revised to eliminate promoting unity as a CBC priority. The mantra now is to "contribute to the national consciousness"--which in CBCspeak means any liberal cause that attracts their sensibilities. If there is bias, Radio-Canada says, then it is towards the Liberals, not the BQ. The evidence? The long line of Liberal cronies who have held the whip hand at CBC. "The sole fact that [ex-Trudeau bureaucrat and political aide] Robert Rabinovitch is the head of Radio-Canada says a lot about the political allegiance of the place." Actually, one has only to view the left-leaning fodder that English CBC pumps out to realize that CBC is practically a (Liberal) propaganda organ. And it has become vociferously so during the Harper reign.
I watched CBC's "Absolutely Canadian" this morning. As usual. it was hosted by the sweet-faced Karla Robinson. Her eye candy appeal helps the viewer digest the endless whine factor of the show. Even when the program tries to highlight the wasteland that some reserves have descended into, somehow, the blame is put on whitey's doorstep. One native, who lives in a shack, bemoans the Conservatives plan to give $300 million for native housing in the north. He states that that money will not filter down to him or the other "out" groups on the reserve. But the truth is that the Conservatives are tired of watching the money taxpayers send either frittered away or dispensed only to the "in" group. That is why the Conservatives want more accountability. The Kelowna Accord did not demand that level of scrutiny. It was simply another "throw-billions-more-at-the-problem" approach. There was another segment which suggested that if the computers of Nunavut were using Inuit language then there would great educational progress. That is a debatable proposition. If these young Inuit ever want to engage the larger world, they must have either English or French fluency. Teaching primarily in native dialects will doom them to a marginal existence only. After a while it would be impossible for aboriginals to even converse with each other. I doubt that a Slavey speaker would understand Inuit. There must be a realpolitik approach to the question of how natives can prosper in a fast-paced world of change. We can't go on denying that the past attitude of promoting an "benign apartheid" policy has failed competely.
And CBC's vaunted documentaries are nothing if not anti-American screeds or attempts to induce guilt in Anglo Canada. If you didn't get the leftist slant the first viewing, then CBC will happily replay it--again and again. What would the programmers do if Bush and Cheney suddenly died? It would be a (CBC) catastrophe. Of course, they could "encore" old "Absolutely Canadian" episodes to fill the void. They wouldn't even have to mention that they were re-runs, as the whine content rarely changes from show to show. The bottom line cause for all and sundry native problems? Whitey's colonialization and that whole residential school thing. I don't know how even the most doctrinaire liberal can swallow such massive helpings of this codswallop any more.
© Bud Talkinghorn
An update to a May 31, 06 post on No one is illegal: May Day
http://
toronto.nooneisillegal.org
/node?from=10
International Manifesto of The Undocumented
May 1st: International Mobilization For Regularization
On May 1st the undocumented have taken to the streets demanding RIGHTS, DIGNITY, and RESPECT. We publish here a Manifesto drawn up by migrant/undocumented organisations from across the world.
May 1st is Labour Day in most countries around the world, celebrated in honour of those who lost their lives to gain the 8 hour work day. On this day, demonstrations around the world will come together to support the rights of the working class and of the oppressed. It is a day of read more