March 05, 2005

Al Qaeda's "Ethical" Dilemmas - Iraq - Gomery: Greg Weston's Details - Dingwall - Hourly Rates for Lafleur - Flags - Chiarelli - Sun-Drenched MP's

Al Qaeda-The Ethical Dilemma of Terrorists

CHILLING PEEK AT QAEDA'S REMAINS URI DAN

March 4, 2005 -- [. . . . ] But al Qaeda also exists on the Internet, where Sunni religious authorities answer doctrinal questions of aspiring terrorists and their supporters.

"For example, one of the most important questions was whether it was permissible to kill 10 million people with a nonconventional bomb if it meant that Muslims would be among them," Zeevi said. "The answer was, 'Yes, it is permitted.' "

[. . . . ] "According to the Koran, in order to achieve the goal, a Muslim world, that would be a mitzvah, a good deed," he said. [. . . . ]






What have the Americans ever done for us? Liberated 50 million people... Gerard Baker, Mar. 4, 05

ONE OF MY favourite cinematic moments is the scene in Monty Python’s Life of Brian when Reg, aka John Cleese, the leader of the People’s Front of Judea, is trying to whip up anti-Roman sentiment among his team of slightly hesitant commandos.

“What have the Romans ever done for us?” he asks.

“Well, there’s . . . ,” [This is funny. Don't miss.]

[. . . . ] I can’t help but think of that scene as I watch the contortions of the anti-American hordes in Britain, Europe and even in the US itself in response to the remarkable events that are unfolding in the real Middle East today.

Little more than three years after US forces, backed by their faithful British allies, set foot in Afghanistan, the entire historical dynamic of this blighted region has already shifted. [. . . . ]


Read the enumeration. I realize opium poppies are thriving but somewhere, yesterday, I read where growing asparagus has replaced whatever drug came out of Indochina, perhaps Vietnam or Cambodia, on at least some farms. I forget the details -- but if you need a dose of hope, search. It is incredible that they can make more with asparagus than whatever they grew before but isn't it wonderful? I suspect the wonders of modern air transport might have helped to get the product to the areas where it will bring in more $$$.




'That sounds totally bizarre' Greg Weston, Mar. 3, 05, Sun Ottawa

Finally, amid the Gomery inquiry's depressing daily feed of waste and greed comes the magical story of David Dingwall, a tale of good fortune sure to warm the hearts of taxpayers everywhere. [. . . . ]


It's the details that add up here -- and JC is going to try to remove Gomery? No wonder!





Chiarelli must go - to NCC March 3, 2005, Susan Sherring, Ottawa Sun

Dear Prime Minister Paul Martin: Sorry to bother you Mr. Prime Minister. I know this is a busy time for you, what with you being up to your ying-yang in all sorts of trouble. [. . . . ]





Lafleur defends $536G flag bill March 3, 2005, Stephanie Rubec, Parliamentary Bureau

[. . . . ] "It seems easy today, but even just going to the stadium, that's a lot of work."

Lafleur's own financial reports, released by the commission yesterday, show he billed a total of 296 hours at $275 per hour and his son Eric billed 300 hours at $245 and another 119 hours at $150 to manage the Expos sponsorship. [. . . . ]


Moxie? Chutzpah? Cara dura?

It would be a hoot if it were a report from . . . . . oh, any place in the world where Canadians don't send money. Is there anywhere?





Taxpayers fund MPs' sun-drenched trip March 3, 2005, Kathleen Harris, Parliamentary Bureau

John Williamson, federal director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, sees the trip as a "thin excuse" for a vacation.

"It's funny how these trips also coincide with the cold weather in Ottawa," he said. "It's France in the summer and the Caribbean in the winter. You'd have to be a fool not to make that link."

Liberal Convention Week -- Crucial CBC Omission in Mother's Statement -- "Our laws go to pot" -- Time to Call Your MP -- Liberals Fiddle-Canada Burns

Conveniently Omitted from CBC National's Nightly News? Why? -- This is the week the Liberals Convene and Discuss Marijuana Laws . . .

Would CBC Allow a Grieving Mother's Truth in Canada Onto the Airwaves? Never!


Statement from the mother of Const. Brock Myrol CP, Mar. 4, 05

[. . . . ] It is time to take our liberal-minded attitude to task.

Prime Minister Paul Martin, we depend on you and we expect you to change the laws and give the courts real power. Give the power back to the police. Take the power from the Supreme Court and give it back to the House of Commons.
[. . . . ]


In the case of the shooting deaths of four RCMP officers and the CBC news last night, was there any mention of the alleged shooter's homosexual pedophilia? I did not notice any and I am sure CBC would not have been aware of what might cross people's minds -- what came to my mind, at any rate.

Mention of the words "homosexual" and "pedophilia" in the same phrase might hurt the Libersla by causing Canadians to take notice of the Liberal youth wing's concerns at the Liberal Convention this week. Why? Do read an excerpt below, "Liberals Fiddle While Canada Burns", for the pressing concerns of Liberal youth.


Maybe you would never think of the above but . . . Spare me another term of Liberal government.



A Reminder:

For those who want action instead of hollow words............

http://www.parl.gc.ca/common/senmemb/house/members/CurrentMemberList.asp?Language=E&Parl=38&Ses=1&Sect=hoccur&Order=ProvinceName

Emails can be sent to the MP's (just click their names and their email addresses will come up.)

Check this site; the RCMP have a book for those who wish to send their condolences.

http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/index_e.htm

RCMP: a book for those who wish to send their condolences






Alberta shooting latest to rock RCMP
CanWest News Service

To the families of the victims, I extend my condolences. What a loss of youth, decency and effort! And the training!

It is a loss to all Canadians; they did a job we do even know as we sit home in comfort. We have sent these young men into danger and our government must pay heed to what is remiss that this carnage is occurring now in Canada. Our words probably are of no comfort to their families who suffer. It should be a wake-up call to this government.




Marijuana Grow-ops -- "Unbiased" News -- Only in Canada

Police call for crackdown on grow-ops March 5, 05, CanWest

In Ottawa, Chief Vince Bevan — a consistent critic of lenient marijuana laws and an advocate of tougher gun laws and the need for a competent gun registry — pulled no punches when pinpointing blame for Canada’s spiralling scourge of illegal grow-ops.

"This is a serious problem not being adequately dealt with by Parliament," he said. "Through sentencing and legislation, we are not treating grow-ops seriously."

[. . . . Peter] Zaduk also dismissed as nonsense suggestions by police and Public Safety Minister Anne McLellan that grow ops are run by violent members of organized crime groups. "These are mostly franchises, run by people who hire others to do the wiring for them. There is an element of organization, but not organized crime in the traditional sense," said Zaduk. "There are no triads," he said. [. . . . ] .


Left unmentioned the week the Liberals at their convention discuss decriminalization and / or legalization of marijuana is the bona fides of Mr. Peter Zanuk. I searched his name and this is what appeared.

cannabisnews.com: Canada Renews Plan To Decriminalise Pot Possession

... operation was detected by police flying overhead with thermal infrared equipment. Peter Zaduk, a Toronto lawyer who has defended scores of grow-op charges, predicted that police forces will silently ...



cannabisnews.com: New Drug Bill at Odds with Court Case

... cream. It is not illegal," as a result of the Superior Court decision, explained criminal lawyer Peter Zaduk....


You may link to the rest of these yourself and decide whether his connections should have been mentioned. If I have missed the inclusion of this important connection or misread because I had too little time, I apologize.





The Toronto Sun -- Several articles have details.

Inquiry vowed -- MOUNTIES STRUGGLE TO EXPLAIN HOW SEARCH TURNED INTO MASSACRE Jerry Ward, Toronto Sun

The victims:

[. . . . ] Brock Myrol, 29, Lionide Nicholas Johnston, 32, Peter Christopher Schiemann, 25, and Anthony Fitzgerald Orion Gordon, 28 [. . . . ]


Search: cop concerns




Excellent Editorial -- The joke's over -- a "must read"

Our laws go to pot


Nothing will happen unless people call their MP's

Tale of anger and violence -- ROSZKO EVEN SEXUALLY ATTACKED RELATIVE Alan Cairns, Toronto Sun

TOP COPS and police unions across Canada yesterday paid tribute to the four slain RCMP officers, while at the same time demanding harsher laws and sentences for marijuana grow house operators. While some cops want the Liberals to bring in tougher sentences for all types of marijuana offences, those resigned to pending decriminalization legislation say the new laws should at least have significant minimum sentences for large-scale weed growers.

The pending laws would increase maximum sentences, but it is unlikely judges would impose them because of low sentence precedents. [. . . . ]


Search: "Tony Cannavino, president of the 40,000 member Canadian Professional Police Association", bikers, Don Sinclair, Paul Hamelin, Julian Fantino, Gwen Boniface, Monte Kwinter, Bruce Miller, Michael Boyd.




And the government's response is.........? Politicians won't provide the necessary resources

Deportees hangin' in -- COPS SAY THOUSANDS STAY AND COMMIT CRIMES Tom Godfrey, Toronto Sun, Mar. 5, 05

MORE THAN 30,000 immigration lawbreakers in the Toronto area -- and 54,875 nationwide -- were ordered last year to leave the country, government statistics show. And Ontario police estimate 10% of the violators may never leave Canada and end up being arrested for crimes. [. . . . ]





Unless voters call their MP's . . .

Read what the police, themselves, say must be done:

Killings have cops steamed -- DRUG OFFICERS CITE DANGERS OF GROW-OP RAIDS Rob Lamberti, Toronto Sun

AN OPP drug officer says he wasn't surprised by the killings of fellow officers in an Alberta drug raid. But Det. Staff-Sgt. Rick Barnum was rocked by how many were slain.

"I'm no longer sad, I'm angry," Barnum, of the Huronia Combined Forces Drug Unit, said yesterday.

"Whether it's government, courts, whatever, (they) won't listen.

[. . . . ] 'IT WAS AN AMBUSH'


Note "charges dismissed"

Was Roszko a psychopath? See Bud Talkinghorn's article on psychopaths "The coming of the teeny psychopath". It will be posted today.




Liberals Fiddle While Canada Burns

Life of the party ... and of the Liberal party -- Youth wing spurs the old guard to back hot-button issues -- Key to majority could be encouraging young adults to vote Andrew Mills, Ottawa Bureau, The Star

[. . . . ] Some of the most contentious resolutions up for debate at this weekend's policy convention — legalizing marijuana and prostitution, supporting same-sex marriage — are on the agenda because the Young Liberals pushed hard against the party's older members to get them there.

[. . . . ] "And if the giant photo on the Young Liberals' website — of two gorgeous women in a passionate kiss — is any indication, the Liberal party of tomorrow is certainly not going to be your parents' Liberal party."




Drugs pile up in Peel raids

PEEL REGIONAL police believe the Greater Toronto Area was being used as a transfer point to the United States for one of two large, illegal drug shipments seized recently. About 373 kilos of "B.C. bud" in half-kilo bags inside five large shipping crates was trucked from Vancouver to a Mississauga shipping depot on Feb. 28, Det.-Sgt. Gerry Conroy, of the Peel morality squad, said yesterday. The marijuana was worth $7.5 million, police said. [. . . . ]





Top Ontario cops in Holy Land for talks Laura Czekaj, Ottawa Sun, March 3, 2005

Ontario cops will get the chance to learn about the latest techniques and equipment used by the Israeli law enforcement organizations, which are recognized as world leaders in anti-terrorism measures.


There is more -- on funding and the participants. It seems to me as though they went to exactly the right place to learn something. I still think they should stop in Europe -- Amsterdam, for example -- to learn even more about what is coming to Canada and what they should be doing now. Politicians, meet with these guys and take a lesson in reality. Liberals, retire.

Bud Talkinghorn: The coming of the teeny psychopath

While crime in North America has fallen over the last decade, teenage crime has increased. What is doubly worrying is not just the numbers of minor crimes, i.e. shoplifting, but the severity of their offenses. Harris and Klebold's rampage in Columbine was simply the apex of viscous teenage murders. There had been psychopathic mass slayings before that by kids as young as 13. On CNN there was a case of a 14 year old who shot a female bus driver to death in front of a bus load of students. The rationale was so trivial that we shake our heads in disbelief. It seems she had reprimanded him for chewing tobacco. There has been an on-going series of these senseless murders. What sticks out in my mind is the recurring description of the teens' complete lack of remorse. The thrill killing by the teens Leopard and Loeb in the 30's of one kid was so shocking that it dominated the world's headlines. Today, it wouldn't even make the front page. The body count was too low. Also, there were no female teen killers until of late. The murder of Reena Virk by a gang of girls was sensational, but would have been ho-hum in the States, where it is becoming much more common. A case on the Oprah show, profiled a grade 11 lesbian and her lover accomplice luring another girl out to a shack. They brutally beat her, shoved a tire iron up her rectum and left her dying. On the way home, they realized that she might live to inform on them, so they bought a can of gas and set her on fire. Then happy with the day's work, they went to a Burger King for some snacks. The dead girl's offense? A mistaken belief that she was trying to seduce one of their lesbian pals. The movie "The River's Edge", which portrayed a teenager who killed a female classmate, then took other students on a daily tour of her decomposing body, was based on a true story from California. None of the visitors turned him in at first.

While teachers in the past encountered a few students who exhibited the classic traits of the psychopath, their numbers were small, relative to today. Also they never considered that punishing them would trigger a disproportionate revenge attack. Today that would be a consideration. Two years ago in Alberta there were 70-some odd accusations by students about sexual abuse by their teachers. Thorough investigation disproved all but three. Many of the accusers admitted that they did it to avenge poor marks or some other minor slight. When told how they had damaged their teachers' reputations forever, some showed indifference.

I don't know what the answer is for how to stop these monsters. Prison psychologists I have talked to or whose work I have read don't believe they can be cured. According to Dr. Robert Hare, a Vancouver authority on psychopaths, there is little we can do except identify them and mount vigilance against their predatory methods. Possibly criminal psychopaths (not all are, but all are dangerous "trust bandits") should be labelled dangerous offenders, without hope of rehabilitation. Dr. Hare's checklist of psychopathy is used worldwide to identify them. A few of his main characteristics may help you spot them, for they live amongst you.

--Glibness/superficial charm
--Need for constant stimulation/easily bored
--Pathological lying
--Lack of true remorse or guilt
--Shallow affect
--Lack of empathy
--Conning/manipulative
--Promiscuous sexual behaviour
--Criminal versatility
--Early behavioural problems
--Cruelty to children or animals
--Parasitic lifestyle (excerpt from High Risk: Children without Conscience, by Dr. Ken Magid and Carole McKelvey)



These are not all the characteristics but they constitute the main ones. Hare, in his own book, Without Conscience, stresses that having a few of these does not prove psychopathy. For instance, a child who is irresponsible or a behaviour problem, might simply suffer from poor parenting. It is only when at least eight or more of these symptoms show up, that you should start to worry. Torturing small animals without any remorse for their suffering is a major red flag, though. To conclude, I ask you to keep your eyes open, for these ruthless predators dwell amongst you. The non-criminal ones might be your friends, but only until they have abused your trust thoroughly, or more frightening, you might work for one. One told me that, on discovering that his father had died while he was in New York City, rather then fly directly home, he stayed on and picked up two hookers, to fullfill his "shower fantasy". When I asked how he could do such a thing, he replied, "The old man was a loser. Period". He later seduced and impregnated one of his employees, then abandoned her. His punishment? He kept advancing up the administrative ladder. Scary.

© Bud Talkinghorn

Bud Talkinghorn: When thugs are allowed to roam free . . .

"When thugs are allowed to roam free . . . " From the Book of Shadows by Don Paterson

If only poets and novelists could be translated into musicianhood--even for a few seconds, then we could see that, within a few notes, at most a bar, what a bunch of desperate scrapers they are--without a tune in their heads, or the rudiments of technique. God, the time they'd have saved themselves.

There are writers for whom no form exists: Too clever for novels, too skeptical for poetry, too verbose for the aphorism; what is left to them is the essay--the least appropriate form for the foiled. They all end up as critics.

He was a writer of such wide-ranging ignorance that his work had real depth, subtlety, and reach.


Other aphorisms that have the ring of truth:

The ranks of the prosecutors are always replenished from those of the persecuted.

In dreams, all butchers are artists.

Where people can no longer freely convey their true thoughts to others, no other liberty is secure--William Hocking

The man who anticipates his century is always persecuted when living and is always pilfered when dead--Benjamin Disraeli

Religion is a monumental chapter in the history of human egotism--William James

The law of self-preservation is a surer policy than any legislation--Ralph Waldo Emerson


Somewhere along the line we in Canada have lost that esential truism. Our courts set free violent psychopaths after little prison time, while our soppy liberal juvenile delinquincy courts mandate that the maximum sentence for kid murderers be three years. Illegal immigrants and refugees, who slowly, slowly wend their way through court appearances, continue to scam the welfare system, or worse, commit crimes. Even when given final deportation orders they are allowed to slip away. At least 36,000 are currently on the lam. The National Post (March 1) reported that nine Hondurans 'refugees', who were arrested by Vancouver police for selling crack, are back on the street after less than a month. Two of them have already been deported once but slipped back in somehow, while another had a deportation order pending. Besides the frustration of the police and the court time wasted, there is the growing perception amongst members of the public that the law has become criminally lax. When self-preservation is seen to be trumped by some elitist version of legal political correctness, a fatal cynicism arises. People stop reporting crimes, because they feel that the criminals won't be punished; on top of that, they might be victims of these same gangsters' revenge. Perhaps a poster I saw years ago best sums up the current situation. It showed an old lady fearfully staring out from behind her barred windows. The caption reads: "When thugs are allowed to roam freely; who than is the prisoner?" I am not suggesting a 100 lashes and transportation to an Australian penal colony for stealing a loaf of bread; however the pendulum has swung too far in the opposite direction. Let's set the old lady free at least.

© Bud Talkinghorn

Bud Talkinghorn: P. J. O'Rourke makes funny again -- "Weaponization" and "universal bureaucrats"

In his book, Peace Kills, P. J. O'Rourke again skewers the foilbles of the left. He picks apart the declaration of a bunch of Nobel Prize winners that has the hallmark of all left-wing thinking. The answer according to them for world peace is always "multilateral action" against the tears of the world, with a large dollop of wealth levelling. This tribunal would have to consist of the world's major Marxist/socialist luminaries of course. It would by necessity have to be composed of members of numerous failed states, who have bludgeoned their own people into total submission. But, using the rhetoric of the 'dispossessed' and that favourite phrase 'the traumatized ex-colonials', they would gain the moral highground. The oppressors do have a role. As a first downpayment they get to bankroll the whole shebang. They have been doing this for decades in the UN, so they are used to it.

O'Rourke zeroes in on some of the key words that the laureates employ. "Weaponization" is one. That is a bad thing. After all, how could the Rwandans or the Sierra Leonians massacre each other if the West hadn't given them the weapons? If memory serves me right, they did it very effectively with weapons like machetes that pre-dated modern weaponry. The kiddies of the hacked-off limbs didn't have it done by rocket launchers. When the barbarians get their blood up, a make-shift club will do the trick nicely. Then there is the unspoken fact that Nobel, the author of their awards, make his money off dynamite. Considering the future applications of that invention, the question of 'weaponization' takes on an entirely different meaning.

O'Rourke also takes issue with the Laureates' demand for "the rule of law". They supposedly do not mean the apartheid laws of South Africa, the Jim Crow law of America, the Cultural Revolution laws of Mao, the 'Year Zero" laws of Pol pot's Cambodia, the Nuremberg laws of the Nazis, the 'subversive laws' used during Argentina's Dirty War, or Canada's gun registry laws. Scratch that last one, as that is exactly the kind of law they would espouse. Rather, they would like to have laws that regulate everything they disapprove of deeply. That the majority doesn't want these laws makes no differnce, because these elites know better what is good for you. So what if Stalin's laws to collectivize food production meant the deaths of millions by Siberian deportation or mass starvation, in the end it was a good thing for progress. No pain, no gain, as the commissars used to say.

O'Rourke sees these universal bureaucrats for what they would become; unaccountable, ideologically-driven judges. We already have that in Canada with the Supreme Court; we don't need a global version of it.

© Bud Talkinghorn--O'Rourke is much wittier than I have made his arguments out to be. Read the book.

Bud Talkinghorn: Ernst Zundel out, Fateh Kamel in

It is a tale of two crackpots. One wants to deny the Holocaust ever happened, the other one wants to kill all infidels. Kamel goes a bit further than Zundel, in that he considered, along with Ressam, the convicted al-Queda terrrorist, the bombing of a prominent Jewish area of Montreal. Bombing the Montreal metro was also a fleeting idea. Zundel never was granted Canadian citizenship, but Kamel stayed under the radar long enough to get his. Now, after serving four years (of an eight year sentence) in a French prison for terrorist activities, he has come home. To a hero's welcome by some of his sleeper cell buddies, I don't doubt. It wouldn't do for his cell mates to actually show up waving GIA flags of course. Bad form, old chap. Bless Peter McKay for demanding the revocation of Kamel's citizenship. His 'refugee' status admission surely was fraudulently obtained.

When Zundel was sent back from the U.S., the government was quick enough to jail him for the two years it took to extract him. Let the same 'threat to Canadian security' be applied to this really bad guy.. . . . and? I will be watching this case closely. I don't think The National Post will let it slip into the classic Liberals' "Let's see if this loses us votes in the Muslim bloc" slow response. However, I'm equally sure that the Toronto Star has already begun a spirited defense of this poor misguided, but fully rehabilitated man. Rick Salutin will be the point man for the Globe and Mail's rehab story. What the outcome of this case reveals will tell us much about the Liberals' war on terrorism.

© Bud Talkinghorn

Bud Talkinghorn: The health police are setting up their check-points again

Having had such success with driving tobacco into the shadows, their next target is demon drink. According to Terence Corcoran's editorial in the financial section of The National Post (Thurs. March 3) the Commons Health Committee is looking into forcing warning labels on alcohol. Presumably it will be akin to those on cigarette packages now. I'm sure that many of these warnings can be used for alcohol as well. The wilting willy and cancerous organs can be recycled. Of course, there will be some wags that will deface them with stickers showing an open-legged lassie, or a robust heart, just to show that alcohol has some redeeming qualities.

Bill C-206, a private member's bill introduced by Paul Szabo, a Liberal MP from Toronto, is being considered seriously by this health committee. The doctor and nursing shortages, the deplorable hospital emergency system and hospitals that are turning into plague houses do not seem to be quite the crises that alcohol presents. Mr. Szabo has furnished the committee with patently bogus statistics, such as "50% of the prison population suffers from Fetal Alcohol Syndrome", and the same percentage of hospital emergency cases are alcohol related. It turns out that Paul Szabo has an axe to grind, as his father died of alcoholism. As for The Health Committee, it has a track record of big brotherism. Nothing the Liberal/NDP like better than to create new regulations and prohibitions. And once they "solve" this alcohol problem with legislation that will be costly to the liquor business, they will pack up their tents and move on to food. Nothing cures obesity like a nasty picture that takes up half the package surface. Perhaps picturing some tubby kid forced to use a walker to alleviate his early on-set arthritis will stop Cheetos binges.

As Terence Corcoran sums it up: "With tobacco as the precedent, loaded with massive taxes and police-state controls on personal lefestyle, alcohol is the next frontier...Eventually, every food product and consumable liquid will have some garish warning that consumption might maim and destroy."

© Bud Talkinghorn

Bud Talkinghorn: Mired in the past -- & -- The buck stops here--and then disappears

Mired in the past--The crux of the bilingual debate

I wrote recently (disapprovingly) on the GO transport system in Toronto being forced to erect costly bilingual signs. So I was interested in the letter to the editor from Marie-Reine Roy, from CBC Radio Canada. Her rebuttal to the National Post's editorial about the waste reiterated all the old excuses for why billions are spent across Canada to placate a tiny minority outside Quebec. Her appeal to consider the withering of French as a national disgrace holds a thimble-full of water with the rest of us. Especially, as she is an agent of the Canadian government's largesse. Take away her millions in tax crutches for Radio Canada's programming and see how it plays even in downtown Quebec City.

Where is her concern for the half million English speakers, who have left Quebec because of its repressive language Bill 101? One English high school in Montreal once had 1,300 students. When it slipped below 500 they turned it into a condo. That decimation for her was probably a Martha "good thing" Anyway, the whole bilingual signage business is simply a trojan horse for eventually making sure that every public service has a 'bilingual' component. Translation: More unilingual English speakers lose their jobs, more French bilinguals take them. And why are the French more bilingual? Because the linga franca (an ironic term that today) of North America and most of the world is English. Even my francophone friends watch English programming on TV. The more travelled of them realize that when they go to Amsterdam or Rio, or Saigon, English, not French, is their passport to communication. They are not living in Paris and they accept that. The only language policy I consider more absurd is to spend money teaching Aboriginals Slavy or some other arcane language instead of standard English. What a cunning plan to keep them from progressing in our modern society. My ancestors used to be fluent in Gaelic; so what? They gave up that in the 19th century and suffered no lasting traumas. Forget the government-sponsored indoctrination and get on the 21st century bandwagon. But permit a touch of cynicism. If the Quebecois and the aborigines became fluent in English they might just leave their reserves. And where would that leave their politicians, who depended on a captive audience?

© Bud Talkinghorn--I noticed that Ms. Roy expressed herself very eloquently in English.




Some Quebec Liberals' motto: The buck stops here--and then disappears

That some wildly-popular TV series in Quebec features a bunch of welfare cheats and general scammers shouldn't come as a surprise. The Quebecois keep electing politicians who have, let's be kind, a relaxed moral code. Time after time, throughout the last four decades, the scandals continued to emerge out of that province. One culprit during the Trudeau era actually went so far as to blame the English media for reporting his financial crime. It made Quebecers look like a bunch of thieves, he complained.

© Bud Talkinghorn

Bud Talkinghorn: Give me that old time religion

Well, on second thought, don't. Unfortunately, our religious past is littered with bodies and incredible cruelties. I don't really want to bring back the Inquisition, the inter-sect prejudices, or heaven forbid, The Thirty Years War between Europe's Catholic south and its Protestant north--a war that per capita killed as many as the Second World War. While proponents will bring up the fact that certain Protestant faiths fought against the slave trade, they don't mention that they and the other faiths condoned it for over two hundred years. The Muslims do not get off scot free either. They ran the African interior slave trade for centuries and today, they comprise the last of the slave holding countries. The new era of world terrorism is almost entirely a construct of spiritual conflict.

Having said that, I find it hard to believe that the tenets of Christianity can be so bent out of shape that its basis can be disregarded. There is something faintly amusing about sacred hymns being turned into hootenannies. A poll from years ago might have pointed the way to this. It asked American Christians whether they belived in Heaven and Hell. Twice as many believed in Heaven as those in Hell. Talk about having your cake and eating it too. Once you toss out enough scripture and dogma you might as well call yourself a self-help group.

I once attended an old-fashioned Pentecostal church meeting with my then-girlfriend. What with the Elmer Gantryesque preacher thumping his Bible, while a full-tilt boogie band played whup-ass music to invigorate him, and the congregation talking in tongues, we were completely caught up in it all. Two hours into the service, when the preacher started to denounce "painted women in tight clothes"--my girlfriend being the only one to fit that category--we still hung in for the finale. These people weren't about to sacrifice any of their beliefs or rituals to appear hip or inclusive. Their one concession was not to hiss "harlot' at the girl as we exited the tabernacle. I recently attended a Pentecostal ceremony and it was much tamed down--not even a hint of holyrolling down the aisles--and the sedate preacher could have been an insurance salesman. It was a bit of an anti-climax, but considering the zeitgiest, predictable I suppose.

© Bud Talkinghorn

March 04, 2005

Bud Talkinghorn: Losing the war on drugs

Losing the war on drugs

My heart goes out to the four RCMP Officers who lost their lives while raiding the grow-op. Their killer was a career criminal, possibly a psychopath [Note: one of the psychopaths as described in Bud's blog which will be posted tomorrow -- I am booked today. NJC.] There is the suggestion that marijuana was only one of his many criminal enterprises. However, Jonathan Kay, in his column entitled "Why the war on drugs can never be won" (The National Post, March 4, A-4) has stated the truth of the marijuana debate. Just as the various Prohibition movements did not stem alcohol use, but rather created a vast criminal organization to feed the appetite for booze, so too, the American "Zero Tolerance" initiative on marijuana production has failed. The best that can be said about our crackdown is that Canada has had the good sense not to cram our prisons with drug offenders, as the Americans have. Despite the DEA's zealousness, there is not a single state where marijuana is not grown and readily available. Their earlier billion dollar efforts to interdict shiploads of low potency grass from Colombia or Mexico merely led to home-grown marijuana of high potency. In a number of states it is now the leading agricultural product.

Kay neatly sums up the hypocrisy of allowing far more dangerous drugs to be legally sold. From my perspective, in years of attending parties where marijuana was used, often in conjunction with alcohol, I never saw a single fight break out. I can't say the same where alcohol was the sole drug consumed.

A bit of historical perspective is in order. In the U.S. during Nixon's presidency there was a large study done on marijuana. To stack the deck for prohibition, Nixon personally selected the top doctor/researcher who headed it. After a year of studying hashish and marijuana use around the world, they found that cannabis use, even in high potency/use areas like Jamaica, was essentially benign. Nixon fired his head man and appointed another. "Go back and study it some more" was Nixon's command. They did, and the final report said, "Legalize it." Nixon and his Attorney-General, John Mitchell, suppressed its findings. Mitchell admitted later in a Newsweek interview that the reason for the suppression was "It didn't reach the conclusions the administration hoped for." How's that for political honesty? Then Trudeau set up the LeDain Commission to look into the same topic. It also said, "Legalize it, or at the least decriminalize it." That report was published, but it was thought that the Western voters might not like it, so it was shelved. Finally, after marijuana useage had grown exponentially and the product was more potent, the Canadian Senate studied it. Their conclusions: "Legalize it."

Just as the foreign interdiction brought about the law of unintended consequences--more and better marijuana--so has the continued illegality of the domestic production. The criminal element sends its marijuana south and gets cocaine in return. What a trade-off! Finally, it is worth understanding why marijuana was ever make illegal in the first place. It was mainly at the instigation of Harry Angsinger, the U.S. anti-drug czar of the time. In the late thirties, he started a campaign that centered on racial fears. Rumours were started that blacks were going beserk under its influence and raping white women. The KKK must have loved that one. Angsinger then commissioned a film, Reefer Madness, to be shown as a movie trailer. The plot was absurd. A guy comes home to find that his wife has thrown away his stash, and of course there is nothing left to do except hack her to death. The supposedly drug-crazed actor is actually rolling his eyes as he is sentenced by the judge. Definitely effective in influencing the cornpone audience of its day, but today it is a comic cult classic to a generation. Hilariously absurd it might have been; nevertheless, it was incredibly effective. Thus began the real war against a drug that Queen Victorian took for menstrual cramps (tincture of cannabis--today's hash oil). So maybe it is time to play this controversy backwards and come to some logical conclusion.

© Bud Talkinghorn

Note: I do not necessarily agree with Bud for reasons which it is too late in the day to enumerate; however, I believe that views on controversial topics must be allowed so people may make up their own minds -- so I give you Bud's perspective. If only our MP's were allowed uninhibited debate and free votes on contentious issues, we might actually get good government -- but that would never do, so we have a powerful clique / claque of Members of Parliament led by the PM, along with leaders of some other political parties, deciding for MP's how they should vote; otherwise the strongmen apply pressure. I want MP's responsible to their constituents, not to the party, and voting accordingly. NJC

Four Young RCMP Officers Dead -- For those who want action instead of hollow words . . .

Four young RCMP officers are dead -- enough pious fraud and fabrication about "reviewing", "dialogueing" about grow-ops and "re-organizing".

The RCMP don't have the resources to protect Canadians, despite the Public Security Minister's constant reassurances. How many officers above the attrition rate have been hired with that $8 billion (over 5 years) they are supposed to put into security? It's an illusion like the $12 billion the military are getting -- in reality $500 million down and the rest on the "if come" basis four years down the road and after a couple of elections.

For 10 years the government has been BS'ing the public because the media have given them a free pass. The government has allowed the situation to get so out of hand it is now a $20 billion business which they have completely ignored. Why?

The murder of four young constables at one time giving their lives for their country is the last straw. One death is one too many, let alone four. Comments from the Public Security Minister such as "review" and "dialogue" on grow ops are just doublespeak for stalling and doing nothing. They've known for years the extent of the problem so there's nothing to review. Action is needed and that action is making sure the RCMP have the resources to protect Canadians. Right now they are short a minimum of 2500 officers. Prosecutors don't have enough resources; sentences are a joke. The Canadian government has provided major criminals an hospitable environment in which to operate. This is well known worldwide.

For those who want action instead of hollow words............

http://www.parl.gc.ca/common/senmemb/house/members/CurrentMemberList.asp?Language=E&Parl=38&Ses=1&Sect=hoccur&Order=ProvinceName

Emails can be sent to the MP's (just click their names and their email addresses will come up.)

Check this site in a few hours -- the RCMP will open a book for those who wish to send their condolences.

http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/index_e.htm

RCMP: a book for those who wish to send their condolences

All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

RCMP: 4 Officers Slain -- Grow-ops, Major Organized Crime, Massive Amounts of Money bring Incomprehensible Violence

Shootings were inevitable, top drug officer says -- No 'ma and pa' operations: Most operators have criminal history, many of them violent Nicholas Kohler, National Post, with files from CanWest News Service, Mar. 4, 05 -- worth reading in its entirety.

[. . . . ] Insp. Nadeau, who heads the RCMP Co-ordinated Marijuana Enforcement Team in British Columbia, took pains last night to distinguish grow-ops from the "mom and pop" garden operations of the popular Canadian imagination.

In fact, the 4,500 grow-ops reported in B.C. alone each year are booby trap-ridden, gang-run dens of peril, where officers encounter the jolt of live electrical wires connected to door knobs, basement stairs descending into pitch black dark with missing steps and noxious chemicals either deliberately or accidentally left to simmer fumes. [. . . . ]


Search: amateur wiring, the operators, criminal history, residential districts

Also read the article by Jonathan Kay, Why the war on drugs can never be won





Grow-ops a 'plague' on society -- RCMP chief: 'Four of our own paid the highest price to fight this fight' Ian Bailey, with files from Lindsay Kines, CanWest, Mar. 4, 05

[. . . . ] Neil Boyd, a criminology professor at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, B.C., who specializes in drugs and violence, said, "Most people involved in the marijuana grow-op would never contemplate killing four police officers or shooting at them. "It doesn't advance their interests. This is an abnormality."

However, he admitted that the larger the clandestine operation and the greater the profit at risk the higher the likelihood of violence. It's also not unheard of to have people armed with knives, guns and baseball bats on site to keep their illegal and lucrative product safe. [. . . . ]





[. . . . ] "This incident serves as a poignant reminder of the men and women in law enforcement across our country who risk their lives daily." - federal Conservative Leader Stephen Harper.

[. . . . ] "We don't solve anything in society by legalizing things or by pretending they're not harmful to society." - RCMP Commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli, on the issue of decriminalizing marijuana.


4 Mounties slain in drug raid Bob Weber,
[. . . . ] "They were not going into a potential armed conflict," said Oakes. "They were guarding a scene."

Suddenly, two officers from the RCMP auto theft unit who had just arrived heard gunfire in the hut. The male suspect came out and fired at them, then retreated back inside. [. . . . ]


Search: Public Safety Minister Anne McLellan, "Nick Taylor, former senator and one-time leader of the Alberta Liberals.", key events in the fatal shooting, list of some of the other Canadian police officers known to have died on the job since 2000



Community reeling over shootings John Cotter, Mar. 3, 05

[. . . . ] Mounties from the Mayerthorpe and Whitecourt detachment are heroes to the boy, who suffers from bone cancer, said David Price.

Just before Christmas, nine officers shaved their heads in support of Connor and to help raise $10,000 dollars so his family could travel to Edmonton to be with him when one of his legs was amputated.

"They rallied behind my son. The money was a godsend because I haven't worked in seven months," said David Price.
[. . . . ]





Public Safety Minister Anne McLellan will consider what MP Dan McTeague is suggesting -- mandatory minimum sentences for those involved in grow-ops. What does that mean?

Renewed debate over grow ops Sue Bailey and Bruce Cheadle, Mar. 3, 05

[. . . . ] The RCMP deaths are sure to inflame debate this weekend at the Liberal gathering, where two resolutions dealing with pot laws are on the agenda.

[. . . . ] marijuana legalized and taxed. . . . . stiffer sentences for those involved in grow ops.

[. . . . RCMP Commissioner Zaccardelli] "The issue of grow ops is not a ma-pa industry as we've been saying for a number of years. They are major, serious threats to our society and they are major, serious threats to the men and women on the front line who have to deal with them. . . . major, organized crime in many cases is involved. . . . so violent it's almost incomprehensible

[. . . . ] "When you have people that are promoting the issue of 'safe' drugs, or that there are harmless drugs, I think that is something that we better understand is not the right way to go." [. . . . ]






Legalize pot, says Liberal Joan Bryden, Mar. 3, 05

One group at the Liberal convention in Ottawa wants to legalize pot and tax it which would remove the financial incentives to organized crime. Of course, there would still be the incentive to grow it illegally to transport into the US and to sell for cocaine. There is already legislation proposed to decriminalize small amounts.

[. . . . ] The legislation, reintroduced in November, would make possession of up to 15 grams of marijuana punishable by a fine of $150 for adults and $100 for minors.

It also proposes that growers caught with more than three plants face up to five years in jail, or 18 months plus a $25,000 fine. Anyone with more than 25 plants could face 10 years in jail and growers of more than 50 plants would face a maximum sentence of 14 years. [. . . . ]






Dangers of marijuana grow-ops

[. . . . ] Staff Sgt. Birnie Smith of the Southern Alberta Marijuana Investigative Team . . . .

[. . . . ] it's organized crime . . .

[. . . . ] we've encountered booby traps, not always intended for the police. There's also the hazards of the poor wiring and other dangers inside. It's a very dangerous kind of job to take on."

[. . . . ] "Once you're inside, we've encountered booby traps, not always intended for the police. There's also the hazards of the poor wiring and other dangers inside.
[. . . . ]


Liberal MP Dan McTeague said in Ottawa that one way might be to rewrite pot legislation currently before Parliament to include mandatory, minimum four-year sentences for marijuana growers.


That last suggestion is one our Deputy Prime Minister will "consider" but I doubt it will go anywhere. This government has been aware through several reports that the grow-ops are extremely dangerous for many reasons and that sentencing is generally inadequate. Criminals even operate here as opposed to in the US because the punishments are so inadequate -- sort of a cost of doing business.




"as many as 10,000 children are believed to be living in grow-ops in Ontario"

RCMP try to curb growth of marijuana grow-ops CanWest, Mar. 3, 05

[. . . . ] Often, the homes are left severely damaged with mould and rot because of the high humidity. Their reconfigured furnace vents create a risk of carbon monoxide poisoning, and illegal wiring can be a fire risk.

Repairing the damage can cost tens of thousands of dollars and officials at the Insurance Bureau of Canada say most policies will not honour a claim for damage caused by a grow-operation, even if the owner was an innocent party and the activity occurred without his or her knowledge.

[. . . . ] In some provinces, police are even instructing teachers to be on the lookout for children who may be living in grow-ops.

In B.C., it’s estimated there are 10,000 to 15,000 grow-ops in the province, with up to 3,700 children believed to be living in them, while as many as 10,000 children are believed to be living in grow-ops in Ontario, according to a 2003 Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police report titled Green Tide. Children are found in one of every four homes busted in that province. [. . . . ]

March 03, 2005

Mounties shot -- Burgeoning Grow-ops & You -- Justice in the Bali Bombing?

Mounties shot

There are about 50,000 grow ops in Canada -- realizing about $20 billion in operations -- most shipped to USA -- some to your kids

Mounties shot in raid on grow operation Mar 3 2005 02:27 PM MST, CBC News

Rochfort Bridge, Alta – An unspecified number of RCMP officers have been shot and wounded in a situation that is being described as "very serious and very tragic" in a rural area northwest of Edmonton.

Solicitor General Harvey Cenaiko confirmed that a shooting has occurred and that police have been unable to make radio contact with four RCMP officers on scene.

[. . . . ] Few other details are being released but Cenaiko confirmed RCMP officers were executing a search warrant on a suspected grow operation when a shooting occurred near Rochfort Bridge, about 130 km northwest of Edmonton.

[. . . . ] Sgt. Rick Oncescu, with the RCMP in Calgary, said two SWAT teams were called into the area. [. . . . ]





This is the Reality in Realty -- Do you think grow-ops don't affect you? Think again.

Grow-Op Homes Added To B.C. Disclosure Forms Jim Adair, Real Estate News and Advice, Published: February 26, 2004

Landlords who unwittingly allow their houses or condominiums to be used as illegal drug factories will have a tough time selling those properties in British Columbia. Grow homes have been added to the province's Property Disclosure Statements, which means sellers must declare that the homes have been used to grow marijuana or to manufacture illegal drugs. For new homes and condominiums, home warranties are being suspended for grow-op houses.

The province's Property Disclosure Statement, introduced in 1990, is a standard form that must be completed by the seller when the home is listed for sale. It asks questions about the condition of the property to help potential buyers make informed decisions. The new question on the form asks if the seller is aware if the property has ever been used as a marijuana grow operation or to manufacture illegal drugs.

[. . . . ]

How can you tell if there's a grow-op house in your neighbourhood? The Delta, B.C. police say to look for these tell-tale signs:

The house does not look lived in or residents are seldom seen (garbage is rarely put out to the curb).

The house windows are always covered to prevent the escape of bright hydroponic lights.

Heavy condensation can be seen on the windows.

There's a strange odour emanating from the house (pungent and skunky).

Humming noises, such as those made by a fan, are heard.

There's excessive vehicle and/or pedestrian traffic day or night at unusual hours





Related Articles:

Marijuana Houses a Growing Problem in Canada
Jim Adair, Published: January 16, 2003

Last month, two Toronto-area Realtors were arrested and accused of heading up a $35 million marijuana grow house operation. It's alleged that the Realtors leased client's dwellings for the purposes of setting up hydronic marijuana grow operations. An additional 37 people now face charges, mostly for cultivating and caring for the plants, but police say the two real estate professionals arrested were the leaders of the operation.

Growing marijuana in a home can be very profitable. Police estimate that each operation can produce about 1,600 plants a year and generate $1.6 million in profit.
Across Canada, police say there are more than 50,000 active grow houses. Most of them are in residential areas and the neighbours have no idea about what is happening next door. That's a big problem, says police, because grow houses are a serious danger to their communities.
[. . . . ]

Police also say that because it costs operators $5,000 to $20,000 to set up a grow house, they often protect their investments by setting up "booby traps" to discourage intruders. [. . . . ]


You had better read the rest. There is plenty of information the average person would not even think of on this website.




Canadian Neighborhoods Threatened by Illegal "Grow Houses" PJ Wade

Ontario real estate professionals were cautioned in the July issue of the Ontario Real Estate Association newsletter, Realtor Edge, that they must "DISCLOSE, DISCLOSE, DISCLOSE!" when it comes to grow houses -- properties used in the illegal cultivation of marijuana. This warning highlights how much buyers and sellers have to risk in transactions concerning properties that will become, or have been, grow houses.

Recently, CBC News reported that grow house operations consume more than $500 million in stolen electricity each year in Ontario alone. These costs are added to the hydro bills of legitimate energy users
The Ontario Real Estate Association’s caution to its members should be understood by home buyers and sellers intent on avoiding hassles and legal complications when buying or selling real estate: [. . . . ]





The Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police estimates that the number of illegal grow-ops in this province has increased 250 per cent. Revenue could hit $12.7 billion

Switch off 'grow-ops' Electricity Forum News, The Toronto Star

TORONTO -- Indoor marijuana farms are sprouting like weeds across the Greater Toronto Area, requiring new strategies to root them out. Those strategies should include relaxing privacy rules that prevent electricity companies from blowing the whistle to police.

The public is at risk and the threat is escalating.

Indoor "grow-ops" pose a serious fire hazard. They fund organized crime. And the marijuana trade fuels gun violence in our streets.

The Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police estimates that the number of illegal grow-ops in this province has increased 250 per cent. Revenue could hit $12.7 billion.

News this week that a grow-op fitted with hazardous wiring had been set up through eight units of a Parkdale high-rise is only the latest warning sign. Police recently found Canada's largest indoor grow-op hidden in an old brewery in Barrie. [. . . . ]





Bashir guilty of Bali charges Mar. 3, 05, yahoo/The Age

Firebrand cleric Abu Bakar Bashir could be free before the end of next year after being jailed today for conspiring with the Bali bombers ahead of the deadly 2002 attack.

The two-and-a-half-year sentence handed down by an Indonesian court disappointed Australia and the United States, which insist he is a dangerous terror chief.

With time already served through the trial, Bashir, 66, might be released before the end of 2006. His lawyers, who claim he is old and frail, say they will appeal the verdict. [. . . . ]


People actually expected him to get off; they 'prayed' for it -- if there is a god to answer that kind of prayer. How can you reason with that kind of mind? Impossible!

Justice? It reminds me of a situation in Canada that did not result in death, but the 'justice' delivered was a travesty of justice. A kid sets fire to a business and not only destroys the business and tries to do the same to the one next door, but he puts all the employees out of work. Guess what? A puff ball sentence -- house arrest! He's a teenager. He knows right from wrong -- and if he was never taught it, then jail the little %^&*%# and teach him the difference with whatever methods are necessary to bring an "I'm sorry" to his lips. For this kind of kid, military discipline with the hardest boiled sergeant would be a "good thing".

Breaking News RCMP: Shootings-Grow Op, Peschmann: UN CA's Prime Minister-Annan's #2, Al-Qaeda's Armies, Russia's Loose Nukes, Liberal Brand

Breaking news on CFRA after 3 pm Ottawa time -- A number of RCMP officers have been shot during a grow-op bust near Edmonton Alberta.

Marijuana is Harmless? The grow-ops obviously are not benign.


Canada's Prime Minister, the UN Secretary-General and Louise by Marinka Peschmann, Special to Canada Free Press, March 3, 2005

Marinka Peschmann is a freelance writer whose first book collaboration, the best-selling The Kid Stays In The Picture; was made into a documentary. She's contributed to several books and stories ranging from showbiz and celebrities to true crime and politics.

Canadian coincidences are piling up in the UN’s Oil-for-Food Program. Fox News reported on Tuesday that Annan's #2 Blocks Oil-for-Food Scrutiny.


Kofi Annan’s #2 is Canada's Louise Fréchette. Louise Fréchette served under Prime Minister Paul Martin when he held the title of Canada's Minister of Finance.

According to Fox News, "Four years into the seven-year Oil-for-Food program with graft and mismanagement by then rampant, Fréchette intervened directly by telephone to stop United Nations auditors from forwarding their investigations to the UN Security Council." [. . . . ]



Search: UN Anti-Corruption panel, Volcker Committee's Investigation, Martin and Fréchette

Do not miss the last two paragraphs.




FOXnEWS.COM - U.S. & World - Annan's #2 Blocks Oil-for-Food Scrutiny

George Russell is Executive Editor of FOX News. Claudia Rosett is a journalist-in-residence with the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies.

UNITED NATIONS — With U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan (search) next up for review by Paul Volcker’s inquiry into the Oil-for-Food scandal, a crucial question is whether Volcker will expand upon information tying the scandal directly to the U.N. chief’s office — by way of Annan’s second-in command, Louise Frechette (search). [. . . . ]


Search: "Frechette had connections to a number of Oil-for-Food figures."





[. . . . This is the ]the pivotal human element of security. Good security is 20 percent equipment and 80 percent people, says Gen. Eugene Habiger, a former commander of U.S. strategic nuclear forces.


Russia's loose nukes James Holmes, Editorial/Op-Ed, Mar. 3, 05

James Holmes, a senior research associate at the University of Georgia Center for International Trade and Security, co-edited "Nuclear Security Culture: The Case of Russia," a major peer-reviewed report sponsored by NATO and the Nuclear Threat Initiative.

On Feb. 24, President Bush and Russian President Vladimir Putin met in Bratislava, Slovakia, to discuss a variety of issues. Defying predictions that they would accomplish nothing of substance, the two presidents inked an agreement on nuclear security. They vowed to "focus increased attention on the 'security culture' in our countries, including fostering disciplined, well-trained, and responsible custodians and protective forces, and fully utilized and well-maintained security systems." To describe this as a welcome move understates matters. To prevent nuclear terrorism at home, American leaders must look abroad — in particular to Russia, a country awash in the makings of nuclear weapons. [. . . . ]






The Saudi Buck Stops Here FrontPageMagazine.com, March 3, 2005

[The State Department sharply criticized Saudi Arabia for its human rights abuses in its annual report published last week. Nothing, however, is being said about Saudi Arabia's continuous funding of the spread of Wahhabism around the world. Wahhabism remains the major source of Islamist ideology and Saudi Arabia has never stopped funding its expansion. The Saudis don't like to hear about that, however, and so the Administration is keeping mum.

In an attempt to prevent exposure of how they fund terrorism, the Saudis have been suing those who attempt focus light on their crime in British courts. And they have been successful. Current detailed information on the Saudis' funding of international Islamist terrorism is extremely difficult to come by. Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld, however, is making up for that deficit in her book, Funding Evil: How Terrorism is Financed and How to Stop It. The updated paperback has just been published in the midst of a legal battle to uphold the First Amendment, so that the US media can also report about the ongoing Saudi funds for terror, without fearing expensive libel lawsuits. The following is an excerpt from Funding Evil -- The Editors] [. . . . ]


Link and read.

Search: threatening to sue, Saudi billionaire Khalid bin Mahfouz, named in all the 9/11 lawsuits, BCCI Group, Muwafaq Foundation, Golden Chain, Benevolence International Foundation, Prince Turki, the Saudi ambassador to London, handed a judgment




Al-Qaeda's Armies by Jonathan Schanzer, interviewed on FrontPageMagazine.com, March 3, 2005

FP: What motivated you to write this book?

Schanzer: I first started thinking about Al-Qaeda's Armies when I came to the Washington Institute for Near East Policy in September 2002. One year after the 9/11 attacks, analysts inside the beltway were spending countless hours researching al-Qaeda, but there was something missing. The primary target known as "al-Qaeda" had been oversimplified. As a result, many Americans believed that if the U.S. military simply captured Usama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri, the terrorist threat would dissipate. The Bali bombing and the attack on the French Tanker Limburg in Yemen that fall demonstrated to me that al-Qaeda's power and reach stemmed from a network of small and local groups that work as "subcontractors" for terrorist attacks all over the world, even as bin Laden and his top lieutenants hid in distant caves. In other words, the al-Qaeda network was able to be resilient because it relied not only upon its top leaders and clandestine cells, but also "affiliate groups," which are larger, homegrown, organic Islamist terror groups that became volunteer fighters for the al-Qaeda matrix. . . .

FP: Tell us how the affiliate groups give al-Qaeda its resiliency. [. . . . ]

FP: Could you discuss the sources you used for your research? [. . . . ]

FP: You interviewed one of Saddam Hussein's former intelligence officers. Can you tell us about that experience? [. . . . ]

FP: What it will take to successfully fight and defeat these affiliate groups? [. . . . ]





What do Liberals stand for? -- Not any one ideology, but a 'modus operandi, an unalloyed pragmatism' and 'a shameless appetite for power,' Andrew Cohen writes as the party begins its policy convention in Ottawa.


Liberal brand Andrew Cohen, The Ottawa Citizen, Mar. 3, 05

Andrew Cohen teaches journalism and international affairs at Carleton University. Email: andrew_cohen@carleton.ca

/'libr( )l/ -n. One that will run from the left and govern from the right, but has an uncanny instinct for finding the centre and holding it ...
- - -
As the legions of the Liberal Party of Canada gather today to talk policy, their real impulse is to celebrate power -- the enduring success of a political dynasty that has governed Canada for all of the last decade, much of the last generation, and most of the last century. [. . . . ]

And yet, as Liberals salute their success this week, some of them worry deeply about their party. If the land is strong, as they boasted in 1972, is the brand strong in 2005? [. . . . ]


This is well written -- worth reading -- cynics will enjoy it.

Budget 2005 -- Various Angles -- Defense -- Security -- Politics -- Foreign Policy -- Stelco -- UNSCAM Rot -- Financial Markets -- Tung Chee-hwa -- &

Less than meets the eye -- budget -- a closer look at backloading National Post, March 3, 2005

[. . . . ] Of the $13-billion in new defence spending promised by Mr. Goodale, only one-fifth will be invested over the next three fiscal years; the Forces will have to wait until 2009 and beyond for the other $10-billion. Until then, there will be no money for new helicopters, transport ships and planes, nor even a portion of the 8,000 new troops and reservists the Liberals promised during the federal election last year. Canadian Forces officials have even had to delay a planned pay raise for uniformed personnel, so unsure are they of how much new money their department will receive this year, and when. [. . . . ]


What Canadians voted for--some say out of fearmongering over the economy--and now have in a government is appalling; check for yourself.



There is an excellent article by William Watson in today's National Post on what the Conservatives predicted on the budget before the June 2004 election, what the Liberals said at the time, and the actuality today.

'Delivering on commitments'? Yeah, right

[. . . . ] Table 1.3 of last week's Budget Plan 2005, which you'll find on p. 27

[. . . . ] But check last week's budget (Table 7.6, p. 258, to be precise).

[. . . . ] But the overall impression the budget creates is the bad taste of having been had.



Search: fiscal black hole



Victor Salus: Liberal Defence Spending: More Smoke and Mirrors -- search And as it turns out, this initial spending will end up being less. A lot less.



CBC's budget bias Arthur Weinreb, Associate Editor, Canada Free Press, March 1, 2005

Search: "The CBC, of course has a conflict"

That one reference will leas to all you need to know about the CBC's reporting -- if you need more proof.



"The first duty of a government is to protect its citizens."

Defense Policy -- letter


Foreign policy, courtesy of Quebec -- "Re: Bush Won't Call PM, March 2."

Search: marginal, defence

What is a "national party", anyway? According to the mainstream media, conservatives have not had one. Well, I beg to differ.

I hesitated about drawing attention to this letter because I have been chastised a bit for how I write about Quebec and China -- probably rightly for the tone of what I write; I am rather blunt. However, I am more than the sum of my words. I am also my own behaviour and actions toward other ethnic or cultural groups and I don't believe that should be a problem for anyone. Some people have even agreed--or at least tolerated--my views because the subjects deserve debate.

If 250,000 immigrants and refugees enter the country per year, 99% become good citizens but that 1/2 -1% of 250000 = 1200 bad -- and they can cause a lot of damage to all Canadians. It is preferable to separate the good from the rest and go after the bad apples but the government lumps them in with the good and does basically nothing except to make sure the security forces / RCMP mind their manners.


I do want to draw attention to these few dangerous ones and to what I see as the control of all aspects of Canadians' lives, seemingly without concern for what the majority think or prefer. I am concerned about the current direction of our government in foreign policy and its push for business 'partnerships' -- where Canadians should read the fine print and check what has happened in the past. This needs more media scrutiny. I worry about Canada's security which is allied to immigration/refugee policies -- and, if you read past posts, you will know to what that refers. To anyone else who is offended, read the material to which I refer. They makes the arguments.

All this is why I decided against self-censorship and I have included the usual posts on whatever I find. We have had enough of self-censorship in the mainstream media.




Politics

Paul Martin's best friend Don Martin, National Post, Mar. 3, 05

This may be good advice to Stephen Harper.

For example, there's his curious preoccupation with Quebec, where he won't win seats in the next election, at the expense of Ontario, where he risks letting Conservative seats slip back to the Liberals [. . . . ]





Exposing the rot behind Oil-for-Food Claudia Rosett, National Post from The New Republic, Mar. 3, 05 -- finally -- but it tells only part of the story. For even more, look at the following.

Search Google: "oil for food, Canada Free Press"

Search Canada Free Press website: "oil for food" -- and, while there are other articles, do not miss one entitled Canada's global connections

Judi McLeod has done the research; you will learn much more.





Stock jumps after Stelco rejects bids -- Shares up 28% as steelmaker seeks new capital Peter Brieger, Mar. 3, 05, Financial Post

Stelco Inc. shares rocketed 28% yesterday after the steelmaker rejected all bids for the company and said it now plans to tap the market to raise fresh capital -- a decision that dissolves Russian steelmaker OAO Severstal's effort to buy the whole company. [. . . . ]


There is more, of interest to investors.




China, Europe gaining larger share of world's financial assets Jonathan Ratner, Mar. 3, 05, Financial Post

Global financial stocks were comparable to the world's GDP in 1980, at roughly $12-trillion. Since then, the expansion of stock markets, banks and other financial institutions has contributed to enormous growth in the capital available for lending and borrowing. World assets jumped to $53-trillion by 1993 and could reach $200-trillion by 2010, according to a study by McKinsey Global Institute. Europe is gaining ground, as is China, where financial markets are expanding quickly, making them more relevant in the world system. Meanwhile, Japan is losing global share.[. . . . ]






A hopeful sign for Hong Kong or a Beijing crackdown? -- "Born in Shanghai in 1937, Mr. Tung was the son of a shipping magnate who fled to Hong Kong rather than live under Mao Zedong's communists."

Tung's term marred by fumbling of economy, uncaring attitude -- Beijing's man in Hong Kong had been criticized Kelly McParland, National Post

When China selected Tung Chee-hwa to run Hong Kong in 1997, it saw him as everything it could hope for: successful, steely, a wealthy businessman who could be counted on to stick to the line laid down by Beijing.

Unfortunately, Mr. Tung wasn't what Hong Kong had in mind, and after eight years of gaffes, missteps and plain bad luck he finally appears to have been eased out, according to reports in Hong Kong.

Mr. Tung was a successful shipping tycoon, just the sort of self-made man Hong Kong would normally take to, but his term as "chief executive" of the former colony went wrong right from the start.
[. . . . ]

Search: Tiananmen Square, crises, anti-subversion bill, Hu Jintao

Jonas on Zundel-IRPA, Schoolgirl Wins Right to Wear Muslim gown, Without Firing a Shot!

George Jonas -- Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA)

The state's immune system, run amok George Jonas, Mar. 3, 05, National Post

I suspect 65-year-old Holocaust-denier Ernst Zundel dearly wishes he were a security threat. Unlike Federal Court Justice Pierre Blais, however, I don't think he is. I think the obnoxious pamphleteer is just a contemptible crank.

But whether Judge Blais was right or wrong last week when he found Zundel a security threat isn't the important issue. The important issue is what's happening to the rule of law in Canada. [. . . . ]


This is another exploration of a very difficult topic -- when you consider what is in the balance, our security or individual rights. It must be discussed. I am tired of pronouncements from on high -- from the group which has stooped so low.

Search: lupus, evil-thinkers, today's exception, statism, Justice Blais




The finer points in running a politically correct society

What does costume signify? I have no problem with most silly costumes of youthful rebellion, the normal outrageousness, but I wonder if the message sent by some costuming is not outside the realm of youthful rebellion, even intentionally, and dangerously? If the rest have to wear a uniform, should not all be required to do so? Is some costuming more significant than others, anyway? Does it lean toward reinforcing activities carried to their logical extreme by what Al Jazeera so lovingly presents to the 'peaceful' as the triumphs over the infidels?

What to do about it? Even the thought flies in the face of what George Jonas has written -- and he makes sense. Muy complicado.


Schoolgirl wins right to wear Muslim gown Joshua Rozenberg, Mar. 3, 05

[. . . . ] Shabina Begum, 16, decided when she turned 14 to wear a jilbab, a full-length dress that conceals the shape of a woman's arms and legs. She said the decision of Denbigh High School, in Luton, to insist that she wore uniform was the consequence of an atmosphere in which Islam had been made "a target for vilification in the name of the war on terror". [. . . . ]


I might as well be killed for a sheep as a lamb; I have failed to find many redeeming qualities in the 'peacful' religion -- with the exception that the children within their families may have more respect for their elders--if that is always a good thing--and it appears they drink less--but do they partake of drugs less? I think of qat and marijuana and the areas where the poppy grows. I suspect many prohibitions are publicly proclaimed and affirmed, then privately flouted, as with most of these things. And of course, the life of women is . . . . . . something to be dreaded by Western women. Thus, I don't want to see more and more symbols of it -- and there was enough significance to warrant going to court over this costume. That tells me something. It was not parental strictures; the girl's parents are dead -- so who was paying for this? Who is 'guiding' her in this battle? Why?





Opium poppy production grows AFP, March 03, 2005

VIENNA - Opium poppy cultivation in Afghanistan soared to near-record levels in 2004, posing a threat to the country's stability, the International Narcotics Control Board said yesterday. [. . . . ]





Without Firing a Shot! -- The real war at your Door J.B. Williams, March 1, 2005

[. . . . ] Subversion is defined as "a systematic attempt to overthrow or undermine a government or political system by persons working secretly from within". [. . . . ]


Applicable to the US and Canada -- wide-ranging -- marriage, judiciary, republic, capitalism, etc -- just read it.

Corporate Welfare Shell Game, Corporate Social Responsibility, Punishing Capital & Next Trust Threat

Corporate Welfare Shell Game -- & Social Responsibility

When I first saw this, I was so pleased for the university; then I read a the fine print.

Little-known university now a big part of GM design plan -- Cash infusion 'catapults us into the big leagues' -- University of Ontario Institute of Technology

[. . . . ] The Ontario and federal governments have each committed approximately $200-million toward GM's $2.5-billion upgrade plan, which will create 500 jobs in the southern Ontario communities of Ingersoll, Oshawa and St. Catharines. [. . . . ]


Search: Mike Harris Conservative government





Corporate welfare takes the wheel -- Automakers roll out the profits while Ontario's taxpayers foot the bill Tasha Kheiriddin and John Williamson, Mar. 3, 05, Financial Post

Yesterday, the Ontario economy hit the road to perdition. In the name of job creation and competitiveness, the provincial and federal governments committed $435-million to [. . . . ]


Search: "Corporate welfare is nothing but"




The bottomless pit of CSR policies -- Which will it be? Corporate social responsibility or return on investment for shareholders? Peter Foster, Mar. 2, 05, Financial Post

Corporate Social Responsibility is a proposition with which it is allegedly impossible to argue. If you question its multiplying meanings or its murky metrics, you are accused of espousing "irresponsibility," of wanting to outlaw philanthropy and trash the environment, of being a blinkered ideologue who believes employees, suppliers and local communities should be treated with contempt. This is all, to put it bluntly, baloney.

[. . . . ] Such a notion betrays a stunning misreading not merely of CSRs critics but of the nature and function of markets and profit-seeking companies more generally. It implies that the interests of investors and society are somehow alternatives, even natural enemies. [. . . . ]


Search: practical pitfalls





We must stop punishing capital March 2, 2005, Norma Kozhaya, Financial Post

Search: "Canada is one of the few countries in the world to employ a corporate capital tax", C.D. Howe Institute, Montreal Economic Institute





The next trust threat Jack. M. Mintz, Mar. 2, 05

I have found his work always to be worth reading.

The welcome elimination of the 30% foreign property limitation for pension plans and RRSPs in last week's federal budget could have a surprising impact on the popular $135-billion income trust market. It won't be because of a flight of capital to foreign markets, but instead will result from the possible surging growth of an alternative corporate organization -- limited partnerships, which have been included in the definition of "foreign property" under the now-defunct rule.

[. . . . ] The next trust threat -- Taxation of shareholder income is highly imbalanced, and the end of pension-RRSP foreign content limits heralds a climate for change [. . . . ]

Harvard: Academic Freedom, Feminists and Science -- & -- Winning Scientists in the Maritimes

Barbara Kay on Harvard Pres. Lawrence Summers, Academic Freedom, Universities, Mobbing -- Excellent! -- in the spirit of enquiry and free speech, a must read

Mob rule at Harvard Barbara Kay, National Post, Mar. 2, 05

As everyone by now knows, on Jan. 14 Harvard University president Summers opined that the low number of women at the pinnacle of math and science research might be due in part to innate differences between men's and women's cognitive abilities in those areas.

He didn't say that women are dumber, but that, on average, they are less likely to be either hypersmart or hyperdumb. What's more, the available data suggests Summers is entirely correct. [. . . . ]


Search the paragraph beginning "In a classic mobbing episode " and do read the "12-point profile Professor Westhues has developed to identify true mobbing"

Finally, read the last paragraph, advice Kay offers to Professor Summers. Another voice of common sense.

In the same spirit, the next time some neanderthal suggests I am a redneck, would Ms. Kay please give me a snappy comeback? -- Something other than "I am simply stating what I believe based on extensive reading and some experience, along with using my powers of deduction" -- which certainly lacks a certain je ne sais quoi -- perhaps zing. It won't be picked up as a media sound bite -- and isn't that what everyone wants?





Winner of AUPAC/2005 Prize is a Female in Physics--All are Winners -- APICS Undergraduate Physics and Astronomy Conference, Saint Mary's University, Feb. 4 - 6, 2005

Would you not be proud if one of these students were yours?


For those who, like me, wondered about the acronyms, here it is: AUPAC (APICS Undergraduate Physics and Astronomy Conference 2005).



AUPAC/2005 Prize Winners
Prize Winners
Best Poster

1st Place: Bobby MacDougall (Acadia)
Title: "Charge Density Waves in ZnXNb3Te4: Effects of Zn Interaction"

Best Talks (NSERC Atlantic Representatives Undergrad Student Awards)

1st Place: Heather Hickey (UNB)
Title: "Magnetic Resonance Measurements to Determine Oil and Water
Content in Model Starch Food Samples"

2nd Place: Aaryn Tonita (Acadia)
Title: "The Solar Neutrino Problem"

3rd Place: Roderick Chisolm (SMU)
Title: "Utilizing digital in-line holography to investigate polymer
crystallization"

APICS Undergraduate Science Communication Award
("best able to communicate a science topic to the general public")
as voted on by conference participants:

Markus Baker (Mount Allison)
Title: "Heavy Metal- It's Not About the Music"


Participating students by university and a list of presentations

All of these students--male and female, note--spent a weekend in Halifax for this this. Is this not heartening? Congratulations to all these winners!

Western Standard: Steyn, Robson, Byfield -- Voices of Intelligence

Mark Steyn: Brilliant as usual

Just read the beginning of We’re doomed

[. . . . ] what happens when an entire people lacks the will to rouse itself from self-destruction [. . . . ]



Do the math John Robson, 28 February 2005

we still understand many legal matters precisely that way: we do not think murder is wrong because it is illegal; we insist that it be illegal because it is wrong. But recently, positive (man-made) law has elbowed aside natural law in many areas, including family, so that statutes no longer reflect reality but, instead, create it. [. . . . ]




Fear of the ‘R’ word Ted Byfield, 28 February 2005

If anything characterizes New Canada (meaning the nation being manufactured by our judicial and sociological rulers in Ottawa), it is its fear of, and contempt for, the people on whose behalf the New Canada is ostensibly being created. Thus, if any single word evokes horror for the makers of the New Canada, it’s the word, “referendum.”

As this is written, five billboards are being raised in major cities, east and west, declaring: “Gay marriage? Let the people decide.” Since the billboard is signed, www.MarriageReferendum.ca, an avenue is provided through which these five could spawn donations to erect scores more.[. . . . ]

March 02, 2005

Canada: Reaping What we Sow, Government Still Doesn't Understand Security - Rising Anti-Canadianism, Time for "O, Canada!", Hope-Syria & Lebanon

Reaping what we sow National Post, March 2, 2005

[. . . . ] last week's decision to opt out of the U.S. missile shield.
Recent developments in the United States will help make their case. It was little secret that our closest friend, neighbour and ally would be offended by our refusal to offer even symbolic support for its continental security initiative. Even so, the response from Washington has been surprisingly swift.

Most notable was the apparent cancellation of a mid-April visit to Ottawa by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice -- a decision that CTV news has reported was . . . . a NORAD surveillance project in Goose Bay, Labrador -- one that would enhance Canada's role in continental security while creating 340 short-term jobs and 100 permanent ones -- appears to be in jeopardy, with U.S. officials having cancelled a related information briefing following last week's announcement.

Response from the U.S. media has been equally disturbing. [. . . . ]





They still don't understand the concept of security yet

Paul Cellucci, the outgoing U.S. ambassador to Canada, was a keynote speaker at the American Assembly, and he told the participants that "security trumps trade, while we must keep trade flowing."


The closer we get, the farther apart we are -- Report warns of rising tide of U.S. 'anti-Canadianism' Scott Stinson, National Post, Mar. 2, 05

Canada and the United States are at their most acrimonious point in recent history, despite being more reliant on each other than ever, an assembly of 70 high-profile citizens of the two countries warns.

"It is by now evident that Canada is losing influence in Washington," says the report, the product of the American Assembly, a series of meetings last month in New York. [. . . . ]





Remember Richler's title? "Oh Canada, Oh, Quebec" -- Well, it is time for "O, Canada!"

(If I have misremembered the title, I apologize.)

O, Canada! March 02, 2005, Fox News, John Gibson

What she [Condoleezza Rice ] is mad about -- and what I am mad about -- is that Canada decided it would pull out of the American-sponsored and American-paid-for North American Missile Defense Program (search).

This program involves the U.S. building a missile defense system and hopefully being able to shoot down missiles aimed at America -- presumably from some nut job nation like North Korea (search). [. . . . ]


Search: sovereign airspace




A Loosening Grip -- Protests in Lebanon give hope to two nations. March 02, 2005, Q&A by Kathryn Jean Lopez

Go to the website and read Farid Ghadry's qualifications online for being asked to take part.

[. . . . ] National Review Online: How big of a deal is the government resignation in Lebanon? Were you surprised by it?

Farid Ghadry: It is a huge deal because not only did it show that the peaceful will of the people can prevail in curbing despotism, but it also showed how weak Syrian Baathists are. And that is very important. The Syrians and Lebanese have lived the last 44 and 29 years respectively under fear from a powerful police state that is accountable to no one. The Lebanese experience with the killing of Hariri has demolished the concept that Syrian Baathista are all-powerful and they are accountable to no one. The Lebanese people are emboldened by the support of the international community and members of parliament like Ahmad Moufatfat and Walid Ido have warned high Syrian intelligence officers that they seek to bring them to justice if implicated in the killing of Hariri. [. . . . ]

NRO: How much of a risk is it for these people who are out in "martyrs' square" protesting? [. . . . ]

NRO: Is it realistic that Syria might wind up leaving Lebanon? [. . . . ]

NRO: Are the people in Syria liable to be seriously encouraged by the Lebanese? Or is the Baath grip too strong? [. . . . ]

NRO: What would a pragmatic U.S. policy toward Syria look like? [. . . . ]

NRO: What should Americans know about the people you talk to inside of Syria? [. . . . ]


Link and read his responses.

Laurie Garrett of 'Newsday' Rips Greed in Exit Memo -- Media Cheerleading on Health News

Laurie Garrett of 'Newsday' Rips Tribune Co. 'Greed' in Exit Memo

In Canada most of Mainstream Media are in bed with the government so it's hard for them to know what truth and objectivity are.


Laurie Garrett of 'Newsday' Rips Tribune Co. 'Greed' in Exit Memo By Editor & Publisher Staff, March 01, 2005

This comes from a prize-winning Newsday reporter; it is worth paying attention to what she has to say.

When I started out in journalism the newsrooms were still full of old guys with blue collar backgrounds who got genuinely indignant when the Governor lied or somebody turned off the heat on a poor person's apartment in mid-January. They cussed and yelled their ways through the day, took an occasional sly snort from a bottle in the bottom drawer of their desk and bit into news stories like packs of wild dogs, never letting go until they'd found and told the truth. If they hadn't been reporters most of those guys would have been cops or firefighters. It was just that way. ...

”Honesty and tenacity (and for that matter, the working class) seem to have taken backseats to the sort of 'snappy news', sensationalism, scandal-for-the-sake of scandal crap that sells. This is not a uniquely Tribune or even newspaper industry problem: this is true from the Atlanta mixing rooms of CNN to Sulzberger's offices in Times Square. Profits: that's what it's all about now. But you just can't realize annual profit returns of more than 30 percent by methodically laying out the truth in a dignified, accessible manner. And it's damned tough to find that truth every day with a mere skeleton crew of reporters and editors.

”This is terrible for democracy. I have been in 47 states of the USA since 9/11, and I can attest to the horrible impact the deterioration of journalism has had on the national psyche. I have found America a place of great and confused fearfulness.” [. . . . ]


Would people flock in droves to news media that offered investigative news reporting, as opposed to press releases? I would like to think so; it is worth the attempt. The problem is not entirely the fault of journalists. Most of us contribute to this by accepting the status quo. We must be prepared to pay for excellence -- and much of it is found in unusual or relatively new places, not mainstream media.

Might I suggest that it may become even harder for excellent journalists to make a living because the whole culture has been trained to want to be entertained, to have everything handed to them pre-digested, requiring little effort on their part, so they may move on to the entertainment. From earliest years, people are brought up on a general appeal to the lowest common denominator--by whatever names it passes--but low-end, tacky, cheap thrills. . . . and all the words that you might insert here might get the idea across. The prevalence of the words fun and success are indicative, usually standing for little of lasting value. If I hear or read another mainstream media outlet telling me what some film star or starlet thinks in the political realm, as though I should give a whit . . . well, chunder is one word for it. Nor do I care to know whatever prurient nuance the Michael Jackson trial reveals. Camilla and Charles? Frankly, among them be it. We don't exactly travel in the same circles.

What happened to the very old-fashioned expectation that an education and the instruments of education (reading material, media, institutions, the web etc.) would lift the mind above what is its natural bent -- perhaps to soar in an excess of exposure to the best? It is up to all of us who want to change this situation to ensure that educational institutions become seats of excellence, that public events, news, music, airwaves--all the embarrassment of riches we have in sources of information and entertainment--fulfil the highest calibre of our responsibilities to each generation, not be allowed to reinforce our basest desires, urges, knowledge, but to lift all by raising the quality of all offerings? It is we who must encourage all outlets offering the capacity for appreciation of the nuanced, the eomplex, the hard-won knowledge and understanding gained through personal effort. If we support the worst, the worst is what we will continue to get. It is us who must get across the idea that devotion to making money is such an emphemeral pleasure compared to pursuit of truth.

I know -- much too old fashioned. Still, I think we as citizens have a duty to try to change this. Good journalists are already drawing readers by virtue of the quality of their output. Advertisers offering something worthwhile might start searching for them. Nothing much will improve until we remove the government influence from all media/news/enterainment offering "access" with strings, as paymaster and devil with which the media must make deals in order to survive. Media should admit their biases; everyone has a bias. It would be a good beginning. As for overweaning profits? Get the government out of this and several other areas of our lives and let us choose our own poisons. Let journalists do the job they are often prevented from doing by the exigencies of the marketplace. Once they are free to explore, to do the digging, I suspect people will pay for the results.

A little dose of freedom would work wonders. Perhaps then intellectual and high culture--as used to describe a finely honed sensibility and a desire for excellence--would not be pejorative terms.





Beyond Cures, Breakthroughs, and News Releases: Ideas for Covering Health & Medicine

Journalists who only report on medical breakthroughs or on the latest news releases from medical journals are not reflecting an accurate picture of the current health care system.

There is too much cheerleading in health and medical news. For years, journalists were cheerleaders for the Cox-2 inhibitor drugs such as Vioxx, calling them "super-aspirins" in headlines in the New York Daily News, the New Orleans Times-Picayune, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, The Boston Herald, the Chicago Sun-Times, The Washington Post and USA Today. Indeed, such hype is now being severely throttled back in recognition of the harm these drugs can cause. The hype preceded the evidence.


[. . . . ] Some television journalists became cheerleaders for the government's spin on . . . . they ran a government-produced video news release

There is good advice here for the news media and for the rest of us, the great puzzled about what is safe -- and, given the evident concern in our Canada 2005 budget about a coming flu pandemic--or is it another plague--check this article. Don't miss the last two paragraphs.

Gang Land, CFRB: Police to Israel, Deport 'em all, Bre-X: Felderhof insider trading trial, Terrorist vs Terrorist

Michelle Malkin: "Gang land" March 2, 2005, WorldNetDaily.com

[. . . . ] From the suburbs to our national forests, savage criminal alien gangs are infiltrating America and luring young recruits. Compassionate conservatism ain't gonna stop them.

As many law enforcement sources have been informing me, native gangs such as the Bloods and Crips have nothing on the recent wave of criminal alien enterprises settling across the heartland. . . . criminal aliens with felony convictions . . . .

According to the Department of Homeland Security, the aliens arrested in New York – half of whom were here illegally – include citizens of Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Brazil, China, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Ghana, Haiti, Italy, Jamaica, Jordan, Mexico, Niger, Nigeria, Pakistan, Russia, Trinidad, Turkey, Ukraine and Venezuela. The operation targeted criminal aliens with prior felony convictions for "murder, firearms trafficking, drug trafficking, money laundering, racketeering, fraud, false statements, receipt of stolen property, producing false identity documents, copyright infringement and other federal felonies." [. . . . ]


Canada's been importing the same problems -- and our government is doing what about it?




CFRA NewsTalk 1010 Bill Carroll -- talking about the police officers who have gone to Israel

* Sending so many called overkill

* Question from someone: Couldn't two go and take notes for the rest?

Overkill? By whom? Not me! I want them to learn everything they can about the REALITY of combatting terrorism. Unfortunately, Canada's public figures who speak for government--the-we're-all-right crowd--make noises that are so full of BS and political correctness that perhaps it is better for the guys who will be blamed for not doing their job when we get hit by terrorism, to go as a group. Listen, learn, commit little to paper and even less to emails; then come home and get with it together; try to convince the government to get onside in fighting and funding the fight against terrorists. Whoever terms this a fun junket to go to Israel is nuts.

If it were up to me, I would ensure they stopped in Holland and a few other European cities having problems -- to be exposed to more "reality" and to learn from it. I still enjoy the program.





A Voice of Common Sense -- In Canada, he would probably be charged with "hate crime"

Joseph Farah: "Deport 'em all" Joseph Farah, Mar. 2, 05

[. . . . ] Last month, the United States pressed charges against Ahmed Omar Abu Ali, 23, a U.S. citizen of Arabic extraction, for plotting to assassinate President Bush.

Several things surprised me about this story:

* It got very little attention from my colleagues in the press despite the many questions it raised. [. . . . ]


Read this. Joe is exercised -- justifiably so. Joe Farah, send a copy of this to the Canadian government MP's who have let Canada become a haven for the worst in the world.

Joseph Farah's book, "Taking America Back" , exposes the weaknesses in America's current system and offers practical solutions that are real and doable – solutions that can revive freedom, morality and justice in our nation.





8 years to get to this stage? -- a trip down a less-than-golden memory lane in slow motion

Could it be that there was a shortage of RCMP investigators by any chance? Who is protecting investors? No-o-o-o-body!


Still Canadians have no national security regulator with teeth; talk has been going on for 15 years.

The day Bre-X gold turned to dross -- Geologist dies, gold tests draw a blank -- Felderhof insider trading trial resumes Madhavi Acharya-Tom Yew, Business Reporter, Mar. 2, 05

On the same day the board of directors of mining company Bre-X Minerals Ltd. found out company geologist Michael de Guzman died, it also learned assay results taken by a joint venture partner had come up empty of gold.

That led the head of Freeport-McMoRan Gold and Copper Inc., Bre-X's new partner, to suspect that samples from the Busang property had been tampered with, an Ontario court heard yesterday.

The evidence, given yesterday, was part of the continuing insider trading trial of Bre-X chief geologist John Felderhof.
[. . . . ]




Terrorist vs Terrorist -- Osama vs Zarqawi

Terrorist vs Terrorist Ralph Peters

Ralph Peters is the author of "Beyond Baghdad: Postmodern War and Peace."

March 2, 2005 -- OSAMA bin Laden gets it. The terror-master understands that the campaign of bombings and assassinations has backfired in Iraq, erasing popular support for Islamist fanatics and unleashing the forces of freedom.

So World Terrorist No. 1 sent a message to Regional Terrorist No. 1: We're losing. We need a different strategy.

Osama wants Abu Musab al-Zarqawi to shift his sights from Iraq's population, to help carry the struggle back to American soil. With the old order beginning to crack in the wake of Iraq's elections, bin Laden sees that his last, desperate hope is to hurt America so badly that we quit the fight. [. . . . ]


Search: strategist, hit man, bombing in Hilla, out of control, infidels are turning

Cdn. Patsies: UNSCAM-Cdn. Connections, Dingwall-Via Rail-$133,000, Revoke Citizenship Terrorist Fateh Kamel, JC & Dictator, CRTC Head-PQ & PM Friend

UNSCAM -- Canadian connections

Annan's #2 Blocks Oil-for-Food Scrutiny March 01, 2005, George Russell and Claudia Rosett, Fox News

George Russell is Executive Editor of FOX News. Claudia Rosett is a journalist-in-residence with the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies.

Is it possible that between these guys and Maurice Strong, there might have been conflicts of interest in covering up the scam?

UNITED NATIONS — With U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan (search) next up for review by Paul Volcker’s inquiry into the Oil-for-Food scandal, a crucial question is whether Volcker will expand upon information tying the scandal directly to the U.N. chief’s office — by way of Annan’s second-in command, Louise Frechette (search). [ See below ]

Four years into the seven-year Oil-for-Food (search) program, with graft and mismanagement by then rampant, Frechette intervened directly by telephone to stop United Nations auditors from forwarding their investigations to the U.N. Security Council.

[. . . . ] When Frechette served as Canada’s ambassador to the United Nations from 1992 to 1995, her boss during most of that time was Canadian Deputy Minister Reid Morden (search), who is now executive director of the Volcker team.

Asked why Frechette was mentioned only by title, not by name, Morden refused to comment [. . . . ]



A search for Reid Morden led to the CSIS site and this:

COMMENTARY No. 85
CANADIAN SECURITY INTELLIGENCE SERVICE publication
Spies, not Soothsayers: Canadian Intelligence After 9/11
Reid Morden
Unclassified
Fall 2003
Reid Morden is a former Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), Deputy Minister of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT), and President and CEO of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited. He is currently President, Reid Morden & Associates, which provides advice and comment on intelligence, security, and public policy issues.


A search for Louise Frechetter brought this.
LOUISE FRÉCHETTE DEPUTY SECRETARY-GENERAL

Louise Fréchette is the first Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations. A national of Canada, she assumed her duties on 2 March 1998, after having been appointed by Secretary-General Kofi Annan.

The post of Deputy Secretary-General was established
by the General Assembly at the end of 1997 as part of the reform of the United Nations, to help manage Secretariat operations and to ensure coherence of activities and programmes. The purpose was also to elevate the Organization’s profile and leadership in the economic and social spheres. The Deputy Secretary-General assists the Secretary-General in the full range of his responsibilities and also may represent the United Nations at conferences and official functions. She chairs the Steering Committee on Reform and Management Policy and the Advisory Board of the United Nations Fund for International Partnerships (UNFIP), which handles relations with the foundation set up by Ted Turner in support of the United Nations.

Before joining the United Nations, Ms. Fréchette was the Deputy Minister of National Defence of Canada from 1995 to 1998. Prior to that, she was Associate Deputy Minister in her country’s Department of Finance. She served as Permanent Representative of Canada to the United Nations from 1992 to 1995. [. . . . ]

In January 1991 she became Assistant Deputy Minister for Economic Policy and Trade Competitiveness [in Canada]


Interestingly, the trilingual (Eng. Fr. Span.) Frechette has received an honourary doctorate from, among others, Kyung Hee University in Seoul.





This stellar crowd want to end the Gomery Inquiry because it is too expensive? -- $133,000 for a few phone calls and "other fees"?

Lafleur hired Dingwall to lobby, Gomery told

Note that David Dingwall, a Cabinet Minister, from 1993 until 1996, left active politics in 1997. By 1998 his firm, Walding International, was hired by then Via Rail President Marc LeFrançois to lobby for more money for a Crown Corporation, Via Rail.

By contract, Mr. Dingwall "reported directly" to Mr. LeFrançois -- but he may not have done the actual lobbying of cabinet ministers
-- and Canadians just fell off the turnip truck.

Documents tabled at the federal sponsorship inquiry show a company owned by the executive, Jean Lafleur, paid Mr. Dingwall's lobbying firm, Wallding International Inc., $133,549 from August 1998 to March 1999 for "professional services" listed as telephone calls and "other fees."



If you missed this little gem, do read it. Another example -- he ran the country in the same way -- and he wants to deep six Gomery?



Dictator was lobbied by Chrétien Alan Freeman, Mar. 1, 05





Stacking the deck -- another Quebecker

He could be a fine individual -- but why do so many appointees to Crown Corps, regulatory bodies, foundations, and, of course, most if not all language commissars, come from Quebec? -- Can you ever remember a power appointee as coming from Whitehorse, Yellowknife, the Peace River area, Saskatoon, Amherst, Cornerbrook or Doaktown?

New CRTC head facing key decisions -- French takes over at crucial time for regulator Mark Evans, Mar. 1, 05, Financial Post
Richard French, a former Quebec cabinet minister [Quebec's Minister of Communications in 1989 ] and Bell Canada executive, has been selected to lead the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission's telecom branch.

[. . . . ] A long-time friend of Prime Minister Paul Martin . . . .

[. . . . ] "He's coming in at an incredibly exciting time for the industry because the promise of competition is becoming a reality in the residential market, and he will oversee the path to deregulation, which is one of the key issues from our perspective," she said. "Then, there is the convergence angle as telephone companies get into the cable business and cable companies get into telephony." [. . . . ]






Playing Canadians for Patsies -- Brought to you by a Liberal Government

Citizen Kamel editorial, Mar. 1, 05, National Post

It is impossible to say, until further information is available, whether the federal government would be justified in revoking the Canadian citizenship of convicted terrorist Fateh Kamel. But should the government follow through on Conservative Deputy Leader Peter MacKay's suggestion to review the grounds on which Kamel's citizenship was awarded in the first place, it will at least rescue from desuetude a powerful tool for fighting terror. [. . . . ]

Canadian Patsies: Illegal Aliens - Refugee Crack Dealers, Founder-Marijuana Party Now a Liberal, Drug Trafficking Ring-Pearson International Airport

Catenacci --"drug trafficking ring" -- Daniele Cappa, former senior operations manager, at Pearson International Airport.

How very convenient for drug gangs to find privatized airports -- if they can just get the right people in position -- and drug gang criminality earns the big bucks to allow them to get into big business. With underfunding of security forces, business is surely booming.

Drug-runner in U.S. jail takes Ottawa to court -- Government refuses to allow resident to serve sentence in Canada Michael Friscolanti, Mar. 1, 05, National Post

TORONTO - An Ontario resident imprisoned in the United States for his role in a cross-border drug trafficking ring is taking the federal government to court for refusing to let him serve the rest of his sentence in Canada.

[. . . . ] Although he has lived in the Toronto area as a permanent resident since he was two years old, the Italian national is not a Canadian citizen, so the government says it is under no obligation to help bring him back.

[. . . . ] Among his accomplices indicted in the drug ring was Daniele Cappa, Catenacci's brother-in-law and a former senior operations manager at Pearson International Airport.

Authorities discovered that Cappa was using his high-level security clearance to transport drug money through customs and other checkpoints
- in one instance giving Catenacci US$180,000 to fly to Miami. The cash was later used to buy cocaine. [. . . . ]






Stop illegal marijuana activity -- by legalizing it -- Join the Liberal Party

Founder of Marijuana party says 'natural choice' for him to join Liberals Mar. 1, 05, National Post

The founder of the Marijuana party has joined the Liberals in his fight to legalize the controversial weed. Marc-Boris St. Maurice said he will be "showing off his new membership card" this weekend at the Liberal policy convention in Ottawa

[. . . . ] He said his interest in the Liberal party does not extend beyond legalizing marijuana. "It's obviously for the marijuana issue," he said.





The Illegal Aliens - Refugee Crack Dealers -- "two of whom have already been deported before"

Illegal aliens peddling crack again -- Vancouver police frustrated with refugee red tape Mar. 1, 05, Matthew Ramsey, CanWest

VANCOUVER - Most of the alleged illegal alien crack dealers snared in a Vancouver police sting last month are back on the streets and back at work, police say.

And, from a policing perspective, the inability to keep the drug-dealing migrants -- nine of whom are Honduran refugee claimants, two of whom have already been deported before and one of whom has a deportation order pending -- off the streets is maddening, says Insp. Val Harrison.

[. . . . ] She notes the time between claiming refugee status and the hearing is more than enough to make thousands dealing drugs and, in turn, the hassle of deportation to the United States worth it.

[. . . . ] To stop Honduran illegal migrant crack dealers from working in Canada, all that's needed is $100,000 and political will, says Richard Kruland, an immigration lawyer.

Mr. Kruland is calling for the federal government to spend $100,000 on a pilot project that would see repeat illegal migrants and those convicted of multiple criminal infractions in this country detained by Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) while their repeat refugee claims are processed. [. . . . ]


Why do they have to be "repeat illegal migrants"? Why should anyone be able to come into Canada illegally? Detain them all until checked out. Stop this whole dangerous business of allowing refugees out on the streets before we know anything about them.

The Toronto moderator of NewsTalk 1010 suggested yesterday that Canada not reward illegal aliens who take refuge in churches by giving permission to stay; in other words, stop rewarding those who do not follow the rules. I agree. In Canada, those who follow the rules and get in the immigration queue lose to those who don't.


BMO's New York man: Vitton -- 'The Michael Jordan of resource brokers' -- mining stocks of interest Drew Hasselback, Financial Post, Feb. 28, 05




Chretien offered to stay on until after auditor's damning report released -- Paul Martin declined the offer Hubert Bauch and William Marsden, CanWest, Feb. 28, 05



Killing with kindness -- Tax deductions for low-income earners simply transfer resources. What's needed is incentives for work and entrepreneurship Jason Clemens and Niels Veldhuis, Financial Post, Mar. 1, 05

Jason Clemens is the director of fiscal studies, Niels Veldhuis is the senior research economist at the Vancouver-based Fraser Institute.

[. . . . ] Simply put, targeted tax cuts for low-income individuals transfer resources (income) from middle- and upper-income families to lower- income families without increasing the total income of the nation or province. [. . . . ]


What has been done doesn't seem to work; maybe their ideas have merit. Check for yourself.




Magna wins approval to privatize Decoma arm -- To be effective March 6 Mar. 1, 05, Peter Brieger, Financial Post

[. . . . ] Yesterday's vote is part of US$1.3-billion plan unveiled by Magna founder Frank Stronach last year to privatize three divisions -- Decoma, Tesma International Inc. and Intier Automotive Inc. -- spun out as public companies over the past decade. [. . . . ]

Note This! UN -- Women's Rights -- or Wrongs? -- Appropriate Moral Authority? -- & Petition

U.N. Wrong Forum for Women's Rights March 02, 2005, Wendy McElroy

The shadows of children allegedly raped by United Nations peacekeepers in the Congo and the women allegedly molested by a top U.N. official fall across the 49th Session of the Commission on the Status of Women

From this past Monday to March 11, the U.N. will meet in New York City to review global progress on the "women’s human rights agreement" known as the Beijing Platform (1995). [UN Beijing Declaration and Platform for Women -- "women’s human rights agreement" ]

[. . . . ] But if abortion is center stage, a more fundamental question still remains: By what moral standard is the U.N. a proper stage on which to negotiate women’s rights? How much blood and corruption has to splatter before the U.N.’s moral authority is washed away?

Its credibility on human rights has been broken beyond repair by the oil-for-food scandal that, as FOX News series stated, "ended up with Saddam Hussein pocketing billions to become the biggest graft-generating machine" in history [. . . . ]


Mention is also made in the article of the COMMISSION ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN (CSW)




Watch for UN's upcoming Conference on Women -- "documents and agreements reached at these conferences become part of international law, norms and standards" -- UN "Moral Authority" so loved by our PM

"UN Ambassadors need to hear from people everywhere that the world does not want the UN to become embroiled in unproductive controversial negotiations over homosexual and abortion rights at the upcoming conference on women."


Help Defend Family, Marriage and the Unborn at the UN! -- Urgent Action Alert! February 26, 2005

This is from a letter sent by those who wish to protect the family. This is important because what is decided at these UN talking fests comes back to haunt the rest who were at home, too busy looking after their families to notice. Pay attention. You may link to the above site to sign the petition.

[. . . . ] UN Ambassadors need to hear from people everywhere that the world does not want the UN to become embroiled in unproductive controversial negotiations over homosexual and abortion rights at the upcoming conference on women. [Go to the site for additional information]

Through our website you can easily send a pre-written email to 129 key UN ambassadors with only a single mouse click. These ambassadors have either supported pro-family provisions in the past or have not yet declared a position on these issues. Just click here to make a critical difference in this battle.

What happens at the UN can have a direct and negative impact on our efforts to protect marriage, the family and children in our own countries! This is because the documents and agreements reached at these conferences become part of international law, norms and standards that shape and influence national laws and policies worldwide.

The anti-family, anti-children forces understand this, which is why they are constantly working to slip things into these international documents and agreements that will help achieve their goals at the national level. They count on the fact that most people who are dedicated to defending marriage, the family and children in their own countries do not understand the power of international consensus documents.

But you have helped us stop them before!

For example, in just the past year, United Families International supporters like you flooded key UN missions with emails that helped us to successfully defeat the “sexual orientation” human rights provision at the Human Rights Commission. Your emails also helped to achieve recognition of the Doha Declaration on the Family by the UN General Assembly.

Please help us do it again! [. . . . ]


Think Kyoto accord and the impact that is going to have in Canada. It's the same with other agreements that come out of the UN.

March 01, 2005

Bud Talkinghorn on the Quebec Effect, Missile Defense -- and the Feminist Effect on Freedom of Speech

Quebec and the Quaker mentality

The reluctance of the Martin government to spend much time or money on the military is rooted in its influential Quebec wing. Traditionally, the Quebecois have hewed to a Quakerish pacifism line. They were not even motivated to defend their old motherland, France, during the two world wars. According to one COMPAS poll, conducted on Feb. 25/26, 31% of Quebecers don't even think Canada should have a military. And their resistance to the missile defense shield must have played into the Liberals' decision to let the Americans go it alone. The combined weakening of federal Liberal support in that province and the dismal ratings for Charest on the provincial front have forced them to acquiesce to Quebec's wishes.

This case of the tail wagging the dog has gone on for so long that I'm surprised that Ontario doesn't rebel. After all, the Ontario Liberals are the real power base for the party now. Yet it is the truly slippery Pierre Pettigrew who is setting our foreign policy. Pettigrew, who was the minister responsible for the HRDC job-creation scandal, managed to escape, thus leaving Jane Stewart to take the full blame. His diplomacy leans so much toward the French model that he actually has an apartment in Paris--paid for by the Canadian taxpayer no doubt. I suspect that if he had his way, Canada would become one of those French sub-departments, like the Ivory Coast. Unless his influence is truncated or eliminated entirely, we are going to have problems with our near and (trade-wise) dear neighbours to the south. That would surely topple the Liberal Party in Ontario, which depends so much on trade with the States. Martin is on a high wire and Pettigrew might push him off.

© Bud Talkinghorn




Mr. Dithers finally makes a decision about missile defense

Paul Martin is going into the big Liberal convention with a shaky hold on his authority. So, gambling that the Americans will pass off his bowing out of missile defense as the usual, he can then appease his Quebec supporters. He must kowtow to the (security-wise) effete Quebecois, if he hopes to win another election. However, he might find that the Americans are tired of propping up their weak sister to the north. Or that Bush and Rummy don't start to perceive Quebec as Cuba north. -- another, closer member of the axis of evil, which manipulates Canadian foreign policy. Increasingly, the ROC sees Quebecois as mini-me Frenchmen--petulent and deluded. For that matter, prithee, explain the difference to me between Canada's stance and that of France's on defense. Oh, I forgot, Martin promised at the NATO meeting that we would contribute 30 troops to help Iraq rebuild. France has committed itself to sending exactly one officer.

While the American ire at Canada won't lead to a military invasion; it can certainly have an effect on our trade relations with them. A few hefty tariffs on major Canadian exports could help Martin develop a backbone, however. For now though, we can see the streak of opportunism that so defines Martin's character--do what is expedient and to hell with any principled stand.

© Bud Talkinghorn

PS: Effects already -- Condi Rice has cancelled a meeting with PM and a radar establishment that was to have been built in Labrador -- won't be. NJC





Freedom of speech is alive in North American universities--but only if you don't mind being burned at the stake for employing it.

A long festering problem at many universities was brought to the fore recently. Lawrence Summers, Harvard's President, in an impromptu speech tried to explain various factors that might account for male dominance in science faculties. Oh the horror! Didn't he realize that there could only be one explanation for it--gender discrimination? Even to speculate about other possibilities is heresy to the politically correct, i.e. the feminist and left-wing socialist professors. A female science prof stormed out of the meeting, and like Paul Revere, her gallop sparked a rebellion. Within days, there were demands for his resignation. Students entered the fray and began mini-protest marches. The number of women I saw in one TV news clip, suggested that the Women's Studies students must have been given the day off.

Summers did what every academic today must do when he offends some militant clique on campus, he apologized profusely--indeed five times. "Sorry", the protestors said, "not enough abasement." He then promised to increase the female staff in sciences. Instant affirmative action was nice, but still not enough. Total annihilation of this sexist swine was the only acceptable recourse to answer his repugnant statements. A meeting of 500 Harvard staff was convened so Lawrence could put forward his case. Because he again mentioned innate gender differences, he was attacked by some. However, it appeared that the majority of the staff would forgive him his misogynistic utterances. Case closed? Not by a long shot. The rebellion spread to other universities and from there to the airways. TV loves a conflict. If it bleeds, it leads. And Lawrence and his supporters were gushing lots of it.

In Wednesday's (last week, I assume, NJC) Lou Dobbs' report on CNN, there was a panel discussion. The panel was composed of three female science profs, and one male gender researcher. Dobbs opened up with his thought that the entire Lawrence affair was completely over-blown and suggested that the PC language police were acting like Gestapo. "Don't you three women believe in freedom of speech?", he asked. "Of course we do," they said in unison. However, the common sense idea of free speech went south with every comment they made afterwards. The poor male, Dr. Sax, could hardly get a word in. Considering that he was the only one that could comment scientifically on gender difference with any degree of expertise, he should have been allowed more air time. I sensed even he was afraid of speaking "untruths". Two of the women appeared to have a big axe to grind about men in general. One of them, after demanding that the sexes by seen as equal, actually told Dobbs she thought women in her department were "superior" to their male colleagues. Dobbs stated that that comment was contradictory and sexist to boot. The woman wouldn't back down. I wonder if she will be pilloried for that comment? I somehow doubt it, as by PC definition, "sexism" is a hard-wired male trait. They do make some exceptions to the mantra that the genders are equal.

To put this ridiculous tempest in a teacup debate to rest, I suggest that you read The National Post's two articles on it (Feb.23). One has the aforementioned Dr. Sax explaining just how different males and females are in thinking. The other one points out the statistical fact that at the top of the IQ ranges--from which Harvard chooses--males outnumber females by a 7 to 1 at the 145 range and 30 to 1 at the stratospheric 160 range. To compensate for the ladies, men are far more prevalent at the retard ranges. However, feminists are not interested in quality, they want quantity -- of females. If the standards of Harvard fall, that's too bad. As Steve Sailer, the author states,

"Most of these female complainants know from their own experience with their children the intrinsic differences. However that commonsense is out of bounds when it comes to Ivy League universities. That, more than anything Mr. Summers said, is the real scandal here."


© Bud Talkinghorn

Gomery Inquiry-Too Expensive? Independent Media & Hoi Polloi "Keep on digging", Weston Smells Liberal Fear, CPAC-Himmelfarb, CFRA, Dictator & Chrétien

He ran the country in the same way and he wants to deep six Gomery?

Dictator was lobbied by Chrétien Alan Freeman, Mar. 1, 05

WASHINGTON -- In the fall, former prime minister Jean Chrétien slipped into Ashkhabad, capital of one of the world's most repressive and authoritarian regimes, for a meeting with Turkmenistan's president for life, Saparmurat Niyazov.

Mr. Chrétien met for close to an hour with the onetime Communist strongman who prefers to be known as Turkmenbashi the Great, leader of a personality cult so extensive that statues of his likeness dot the capital and the months of the year have been renamed in honour of him and his family.

Mr. Chrétien, in his new role as counsel for the Calgary law firm of Bennett Jones, was accompanied at the meeting by his client, Roger Haines, a Calgary oilman anxious to gain a foothold in the oil-rich Central Asian nation. [. . . . ]



Search:lobbying efforts, Buried Hill Energy, China, Russia, Niger, Kazakhstan, PetroKazakhstan Inc., Calgary-based oil firm, human-rights, Canada's Foreign Affairs Ministry, oil concession, border dispute, two-year cooling-off period, Serdar concession, Caspian Energy Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies





Greg Weston: Protests from Chretien's coterie aimed at the Gomery inquiry have shifted into high gear -- they must fear something

"Wethinks they doth protest too much."


Henchmen try to throw bloodhounds off the scent

What's $20 million when it comes to finding out how frivolous the government is with a $180 billion budget? There has been NO inquiry into $1 billion gun registry - so this is as good as it gets in shedding light on wasteful spending habits.

Critics barking at the inquiry's heels -- to save the Liberal status quo? March 1, 2005, Greg Weston, Sun Ottawa Bureau

Jean Chretien's junk-yard dogs are at it again, yapping and snapping at the Gomery inquiry into the Adscam mess, apparently barking for the commission's early demise.

In recent weeks, former Chretien operatives and other Liberal leftovers have been howling over the costs of the commission, with some estimates now running as high as $80 million.

Cost alone is reason enough to shut the inquiry down, they growl. [. . . . ]


Search: Warren Kinsella, Somalia inquiry

Keep digging, Justice Gomery -- Canadians have been saying thanks to the Auditor General too.





Note that I have bewailed the fact that CBC Newsworld did NOT carry the Gomery Inquiry testimony Feb. 28, 05 -- nobody important enough testifying? Well, check the article below.

The problem with the CBC is that it is the propaganda and protector arm of the federal Liberal government, their benefactor and $$$ provider. It is impossible to make unbiased journalistic decisions about what stories to cover in that situation, would you not say?

Ad executive's salary jumped after sponsorship Tu Thanh Ha, Mar. 1, 05, Globe and Mail.

Montreal — Before the sponsorship contracts began flooding into Quebec, Jean Lafleur was an ad executive who, in 1994, reported a comfortable but unexceptional annual salary of $108,000.

In 1996, as Ottawa increasingly began funnelling money to Quebec, he pulled in $2.4-million. He also earned $2.4-million the following year, when the sponsorship program officially began.

Over a period of six years, federal money would be the major source of the $12-million his family paid itself, according to documents released yesterday at the Gomery commission as it kicked off two months of hearings in Montreal. [. . . . ]


Search: $9.3-million, $1.2-million, $1.1-million, $471,000, $30-million, Alfonso Gagliano, Jean-Claude Hébert, lawyer Jean H. Lafleur, who represents Via Rail, $40-million . . . . .

On CPAC I watched the Gomery Inquiry yesterday and in particular, Mr. Himmelfarb who managed to stay in the Privy Council Office (I think that is the name. Check.) The following is just my humble opinion but -- the first thing that came to me was

Hello, the politician lied


and make no mistake about it, anyone who manages to remain that close to two Prime Ministers is a politician. Another phrase which jumped to mind was

parsing the meaning of "evident"


in revealing virtually nothing as he discussed whether the Auditor General had suggested there was

no "evident" value for dollars


He reminded me of Bill Clinton parsing "is" and of Clinton's other utterly sleazy claim,

"I did not have sex with that woman."


and of course, he did.

The conspiracy for Canada's Prime Ministers to

"know nothing"


either was intentional and colluded in by two Prime Ministers -- or what is the other logical conclusion?


I have been listening to CFRA 580 Talk Radio, Ottawa with

CFRA 580 Talk Radio, Ottawa -- listen live as the host, Michael Harris Live, explores the "conspiracy of silence", "politicizing the civil service", slush fund, kickbacks and ex-Cabinet Ministers sliding from office to head government / crown corporations -- and more Excellent!

Some in the media are hearing from citizens crying for the Gomery Inquiry to continue! -- not be ended to save corrupt butts. There is outrage in the land!

Follow that Hybrid Car! How the LTTE Came to Canada, Jabarah, Terror's Singapore Front, Israel-Wold's Myopia

Follow that Hybrid Car! -- or the "billions of dollars in budget measures" -- and note "regulatory package" and "Kyoto targets" -- You will pay.

There were no new announcements but the ministers, who arrived in a fleet of hybrid cars, highlighted billions of dollars in budget measures aimed at making sustainability a core strategy of Ottawa's economic policy.


Ottawa serious about tying economy to environmental sustainability: ministers Feb. 28, 05, Steve Mertl, CP

BURNABY, B.C. (CP) - Kyoto was hardly mentioned but a squad of senior federal cabinet ministers delivered a message here Monday that Ottawa will no longer entertain tradeoffs between the environment and the economy.

"The old mentality that is always opposing the environment and the economy is over," said Environment Minister Stephane Dion. "More than ever now Canada will be involved in the fight to be a leader, a champion of the sustainable economy." [. . . . ]



Search: Dion, Goodale, Industry Minister David Emerson, Western Diversification Minister Stephen Owen, Xantrex Technology Inc., Vancouver, environmentally friendly, leading-edge firms, fuel-cell pioneer Ballard Power Systems, develops power-conversion technology, Jim Fulton, Suzuki Foundation, regulatory package, Kyoto targets

To all of the innocents who thought budgets were simply about apportioning taxpayer dollars where a particular government thinks it will deliver the best services for Canadians, read the whole thing, as well as my posts on the budget from Feb. 28, 05.

I am tempted to suggest this was a self-serving budget for some people -- but that wouldn't be "nice", would it -- and Canadians are supposed to be "nice". Judge for yourself by reading my posts and the material to which they lead.

Then consider where the budget and your common sense point.





At issue is a group that has killed thousands over the years, and done much of that killing with money from Canada. It is a disgrace that our government has not had the courage to list the Tigers as a terrorist group under our anti-terror laws.


John Thompson: How the Tigers came to Canada -- the LTTE February 28, 2005, National Post

John Thompson is president of the Mackenzie Institute, a Toronto-based research group focused on organized violence and political instability.

[. . . . ] On the edges of large nature preserves in India, farmers and fishermen often protect themselves from wild tigers by wearing a false face mask on the rear of their heads. Tigers like to attack from behind, and this two-faced look evidently confuses them.

When it comes to thwarting an equally deadly sort of tiger, Ottawa has its own two-faced approach. We are full and active partners with other nations in dealing with al-Qaeda and its jihadist ilk, yet have a sunnier face when it comes to the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), a violent insurgent group that is fighting to create an independent Tamil homeland in Sri Lanka. While other Western nations have properly designated the LTTE a terrorist group, we have not.

Despite the shaky February, 2002, ceasefire between the LTTE and the Sri Lankan government, the Tigers remain a group to fear. It is the only terrorist group to kill two national leaders (Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and Sri Lanka's President Premadasa). The group also pioneered the use of suicide bombings, perpetrating more such attacks during the 1990s than all other terrorist groups combined.

To support its soldiers and terrorists, the LTTE has built up a global criminal structure combining heroin trafficking, passport forging and people smuggling -- all facilitated by a sophisticated network of numbered companies. The acme of the group's skills is reflected in the 1997 hijacking of a shipment of 32,400 Tanzanian-produced mortar bombs destined for the Sri Lankan Army. The vessel chartered to carry the shipment had disguised its LTTE ownership. In the end, the Sri Lankan Army got its mortar bombs one Tiger-fired salvo at a time.

But what really makes the LTTE unique is its use of overseas communities of Sri Lankan Tamils to finance its operations. Regrettably, Canada's Tamil population has been critical to this Tiger strategy. [. . . . ]


Read the details.

This is a lengthy exploration from the MacKenzie Institute on a topic our government apparently prefers not to address -- hence the great hoohah over same sex 'marriage' and the huffing and puffing and waffling. My assessment is that if the PM and Co can just

* keep Canadians from learning some of what is written in various reports on the state of Canada's security
,

* keep hiding of the details of what the government has allowed and/or encouraged to happen--using a compliant mainstream media,

* keep Canadians from agitating about what must be done,

then . . . what? Why, Canadians would vote for more of the same. Do explore further here.

Other people's wars: A Review of Overseas Terrorism in Canada




Canadian waits in U.S. jail on bomb-plot charges -- U.S. officials won't discuss Jabarah case nor will his lawyer Feb. 28, 05, Stewart Bell, National Post

The U.S. Bureau of Prisons database lists him as inmate 06909-091, Mohammed Mansour Jabarah, a 23-year-old detained at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in lower Manhattan.

Nearly three years after his arrest, this is the only official U.S. acknowledgement of the fate of Jabarah, a Kuwaiti-born Canadian accused of plotting to blow up Western embassies in Southeast Asia.

At parliamentary hearings this week. . . .

Jim Judd, director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service
, told the subcommittee on national security about several Canadians he said were "involved in the planning and execution of terrorist operations in other countries." [. . . . ]


I expect the mainstream media's knee jerk reaction will encompass "abandoned a Canadian citizen", "CSIS, overreaction and distrust" in the same sentence -- or some variation thereof. Don't forget to include "good boys" and regularly "attend mosque".

Don't you just love the way hyphenated Canadian has come to suggest "check it out" -- because our government has been too busy hosing money to . . . . . . to do its duty?

Search: Abdul Rahman Jabarah, Mohammed Jabarah, Mansour Jabarah said from his home in Kuwait City, aka Abu Hafs, trained at camps run by al-Qaeda, Oman, Yemen, Algeria




Dire Straits -- The war on terror's Singapore front

"The Straits of Malacca are a chokepoint. The U.S. has log[istics] support on Singapore"


Dire Straits -- The war on terror's Singapore front. Austin Bay, 03/03/2003, Volume 008, Issue 24, Singapore

[. . . . ] Just 60 miles above the Equator--astride the main sea lane between the Indian and Pacific Oceans--Singapore's location is still its raison d'etre. Prime property for 19th-century commerce remains key economic and geostrategic real estate in the 21st. [. . . . ]

Just 60 miles above the Equator--astride the main sea lane between the Indian and Pacific Oceans--Singapore's location is still its raison d'etre. Prime property for 19th-century commerce remains key economic and geostrategic real estate in the 21st. In the 19th century tin and tea and British troops were high-priority shipments. Today supertankers nose through the Strait of Malacca, connecting Middle Eastern oil fields to Asia's economic tigers. Merchant freighters move in both directions, as do warships.

All of which makes the ferry [Changi Point to Pulau Ubin] ride more than a tourist jaunt. [. . . . ] East of Pulau Ubin, one shipping channel . . . . to Singapore's Changi Naval Base, where U.S. Navy aircraft carriers berth occasionally and capital ships stop as they shuttle to and from patrol stations.

Know the terrain, the technology, and the terrorists, and you don't need a Hollywood imagination to peg the channel as a perfect site for an ambush.
[. . . . ]

AN AMERICAN OFFICER familiar with U.S. Navy security concerns in southeast Asia first tipped me to the aircraft carrier scenario. [. . . . ]


continues here




Israel's Morality and the World's Myopia

Unfortunately, Israel is often a barometer of what the Western world will next face.


Canadians would be wise to read this.

Israel's Morality and the World's Myopia Daniel Gordis

Dr. Daniel Gordis (www.danielgordis.org) is vice president of the Mandel Foundation-Israel and director of its Jerusalem Fellows program. He is the author of several books, including Home to Stay: One American Family's Chronicle of Miracles and Struggles in Contemporary Israel (Three Rivers Press, 2003). His "dispatches" on life in Israel have been widely reprinted in a variety of publications, including the New York Times and the New York Times Magazine. He lives in Jerusalem with his wife and three children.

Any discussion of the manner in which Israel has conducted its armed conflict with the Palestinians over the past four years demands, first and foremost, clarity about the nature of the conflict and what is at stake. Israel is at war—not against "militants," or against those who would seek to "liberate" the Palestinian people. Israel is engaged in a war for her survival, against well-armed and increasingly well-trained, highly disciplined groups of terrorists, who are wholly up front about their agenda. Their agenda is not the liberation of the "territories" that were captured in June 1967 in a war that Israel did not want. Their agenda, as Hamas and Hizballah (among others) freely admit, is the eradication of the "Zionist entity" from what should be, in their minds, an exclusively Muslim Middle East.

This is not the Chechens against Russia. All the Chechens seek is independence. Were they granted that, there is every reason to expect that Chechen terrorism against Vladimir Putin's Russia would cease. The same is true with the Basques in Spain. But not with Israel. The only way that Israel could bring an end to the terrorists' attempt to destroy any semblance of normalcy for Israeli life would be to cease to exist. Israelis understand that, and they know full well that any other country fighting for its very existence would be enraged at being judged as Israel has been judged, particularly by Europe, in the last four years.

How this War Began

Israelis also remember when this war began—immediately after Ehud Barak called Yasir Arafat's bluff. Barak offered the Palestinian people the state and the independence they had always said their decades-long terrorist campaign had been designed to bring them. But in Barak's agreement, Israel would have continued to exist. And that, in the end, Arafat could not abide. So he, and a multiplicity of loosely aligned terrorist organizations that include, but is not limited to Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hizballah, Fatah, Force 17, and the El-Aksa Martyrs' Brigade sought to bring Israel to its knees by terrifying an entire population into submission.


Search: Camp David package, The most effective thing he [Arafat] could have done , tell the tens of thousands of Palestinians, CNN, Barak's proposal, New York Times, Kahanist notion, eradicating

This is lengthy and worth reading. Subsections include:

* No Peace in our Lifetime
* The World Ignores Israeli Restraint
* Myopia about the Separation Fence
* Israel's Vigorous Debate about its Conduct of the War
* Israel's Moral Campaign against Terror

comment here

Ad-Scandal $$$, Borders Coyotes & Terrorists -- Mideast Climate Change -- Gender Roles Iraq

Liberals told to give up on ad-scandal cash Jack Aubry, Feb. 28, 05, CanWest

OTTAWA - The top-ranking bureaucrat at the Public Works Department in November, 2002, advised the Liberal government it should give up on recovering overpayments from subcontracted firms involved in the sponsorship scandal, a government memo says.

Obtained by CanWest News Service through the Access to Information Act, a draft memo written by then-deputy minister Janice Cochrane to her minister, Ralph Goodale, recommends the issue of subcontracts, and recovering overpayments, be dropped by the department. [. . . . ]





Canada, like the US, "can't afford to lose time getting control over the illegal immigration pipeline"

The northern border isn't much better. Do read.

This story ought to have led the news on every network. But Adm. Loy's Mexican bombshell didn't generate widespread media coverage because it was buried in written testimony instead of being delivered in telegenic soundbites


Close Mexican border to terrorists -- mentions "an internal community of illegal aliens" -- "H.R. 418" John B. Roberts 11, editorial, Washington Times Mar. 1, 05.

John B. Roberts II served in the Reagan White House. He writes frequently on terrorism and national security.

CIA Director Porter Goss' warning that al Qaeda might try to use "chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear weapons" in his Feb. 17 testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee overshadowed a more urgent intelligence warning. At the same hearing, Vice Admiral James Loy, deputy secretary of Homeland Security, testified that al Qaeda has changed tactics for inserting terrorist teams into the United States.

According to Adm. Loy, al Qaeda plans to use Mexico's professional people smugglers — known as coyotes — to infiltrate terrorists across our southern border. Adm. Loy's information is based on recent interrogations and has been confirmed by ongoing counterterrorist operations. [. . . . ]



You will be delighted to know that our PM Paul Martin and his government . . . . . well, I don't know exactly where the whole plan is at this point -- but NAFTA and border seem to figure -- and you know what that means to Canadians, don't you? Business possibilities for all, of course.




Pigs are flying -- persistence pays off -- Congratulations to Dubya for sticking to his guns on democracy

EDITORIAL -- Mideast Climate Change March 1, 2005

It's not even spring yet, but a long-frozen political order seems to be cracking all over the Middle East.

[. . . . ] The Bush administration is entitled to claim a healthy share of the credit for many of these advances. It boldly proclaimed the cause of Middle East democracy at a time when few in the West thought it had any realistic chance. And for all the negative consequences that flowed from the American invasion of Iraq, there could have been no democratic elections there this January if Saddam Hussein had still been in power [. . . . ]





This came from a friend; thanks JK for a break:

Sign of Progress in Iraq

A reporter did a story from Iraq, on gender roles, several years before the recent war there.

She noted then that women customarily walked about 5 paces behind their husbands, and weren't happy with that custom.

She returned to Iraq recently and observed that women still walk behind their husbands, but now seem to walk even further back and are happy with the old custom. She approached one of the women and asked, "Why do you now seem so happy with that old custom that you hated then? -- "Land mines," said the woman.

February 28, 2005

Judi McLeod on Canada Free Press: Canada's hidden, media-ignored role in electronic warfare

Note: If you read nothing else, I think you had better check this one.


Canada's hidden, media-ignored role in electronic warfare Judi McLeod & David Hawkins, February 28, 2005

(David Hawkins, Foundation Scholar-Cambridge University, and founder of the Citizen's Association of Forensic Economists at Hawks’ CAFE, and CFP investigative journalist Judi McLeod, have teamed up to write a series of articles on the UN’s radical socialist agenda executed across Intranets and virtual private networks, operated by the self-styled "Global Custodians". A new feature of Canada Free Press, the ongoing series combines McLeod’s investigative experience and communication skills with Hawkins’ brilliant research linking $40 trillion hedge funds, via an online portal on the 79th floor of One World Trade Center, to "disruptive technologies" developed by Canada for alleged use in the UN Oil-for-Food scam, 9/11 and Kyoto fraud.) This is the second in the series.

Pause and read that again.

Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin may have been telling us more than he thought when he said Thursday: "Ballistic missile defence is not where we will concentrate our efforts."

Where Canada is concentrating its efforts should be worthy of both Washington and mainline media attention.

Weapons of electronic intelligence and electronic warfare are where the nation of Canada holds the cutting edge. [. . . . ]



All the following are mentioned. Search:

subsidiaries and sub-contractors, Canadian Steamship Lines, Instrument Approach Procedures (IAP), flying by instruments, MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates Limited (MDA), U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Ottawa-based Air Navigation Data (AND), flight simulators, Lansdowne Technologies Incorporated (LTI), Department of Defence, Red-Team Analysis, alleged, collapse of NORAD command, convert hijacked jets into, didn’t happen to share, Arab-speaking terrorist group members, Bombardier, Parisien Research Corporation of Ottawa, Electronic Warfare (EF), and Electronic Intelligence (ELINT) Defence Simulation and Training Technology Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN), counter-counter terror



Also, there are several new posts below.

Gomery Inquiry & Shameful Dereliction of Duty by Liberal Propaganda Arm -- Compare the Care & Control: You-Your RRSP vs Government-Your Taxes

Shameful Dereliction of Duty by Liberal Propaganda Arm -- the Gomery Enquiry

The last the government and those in its network want is for the public to know what's going on.

CBC won't broadcast the Gomery Inquiry today -- not important enough. La Fleur is testifying today -- not important enough for the CBC to carry . . .

There is much I have enjoyed about CBC, but not its political coverage. A publicly funded conservative radio/television public broadcaster is the only answer OR get rid of the CBC. Which will it be? Canadian citizens are ill-served by the CBC -- and by the whole CRTC government appointee control. How similar to France -- central planning, central control -- no messy citizens' freedom to have opposing views aired.




The government operates on the principle there's plenty more $$$ where that came from -- just like a perpetual motion machine -- that doesn't exist. The $100 million sponsorship program shows how much they respect the money they do receive and that's just the tip of the iceberg - the budget for Public Works is about $15 BILLION -- and that's just for one Department.

Does the government not realize there's murmuring in the hinterland? Knowledge is getting out, and when it all does, Liberal government MP's will be turfed, both the good and the corrupt.

You need to stash your cash

To us, it's always seemed a cruel coincidence that the RRSP investment deadline -- today -- occurs around the same time taxpayers are being bombarded with news about how their elected leaders are blowing their money.

After all, here you are, desperately trying to scrape together a few dollars to take advantage of one of the only legal ways Canadians have to shelter hard-earned cash from the taxman -- and all around you are politicians blustering about how they have to take more from you.

This year is a particularly appalling one. Consider: [. . . . ]


Search: federal Liberals, cranks spending up, By 2010, Sun's Greg Weston revealed, programs that don't exist, Queen's Park, driving up debt, school board level, And another thing ...

Gomery Follows $$$, Whistleblower Legislation 'So Flawed', Stuffing the Mainstream Media Maw, CFRA, Answers.com, Music, Salim Mansur, Mark Steyn

Gomery will be following the money this week -- "AD EXEC, COMPANY CHARGED FEDS MILLIONS IN ADDITION TO SPONSORSHIP CONTRACTS, DOCUMENTS SHOW"

The government refused to make public 24 pages of documents that show Lafleur's expenses in 1995 and 1996, citing that the information contained in them is part of an ongoing RCMP investigation into the $250-million federal sponsorship program.


The last refuge of a scoundrel: using "It is part of an ongoing investigation" -- and of course, "privacy concerns".

$15M in expenses -- do not miss reading this one Maria McClintock, February 27, 2005

ONE OF the key ad executives at the centre of the sponsorship scandal was paid more than $15 million in expenses over four years by the federal government, the Toronto Sun has learned. Jean Lafleur and his firm, Lafleur Communications, earned the millions between 1998 and 2002, according to documents obtained under Access to Information that detail additional cash paid out by the feds to Lafleur. [. . . . ]





C-11 Whistleblower Protection Bill (committee) -- a must read article full of information

The last thing the government wants is a truly effective law that would let the public know how things were / are really run behind the scenes -- like sponsorship times 10. Government prefers the publc be kept in the dark and the mainstream media help them by asking cream puff questions or simply ignoring stories.

The parade of witnesses who appeared before the committee since October were almost unanimous in condemning the idea, saying public servants won't trust the PSC's independence and won't take their complaints there.

MPs say it will take weeks to rehaul bill to protect public servants, some say bill is dead

Treasury Board Reg Alcock's much-hyped whistleblower bill--a key part of Prime Minister Paul Martin's plan to clean up government in the wake of the sponsorship scandal--is in serious trouble and appears headed for major retooling, if not Parliament's dustbin.

After hearing their last witness on Wednesday, MPs studying the legislation say it's so flawed it will take weeks of committee work to fix it.

Some suggest it may be beyond repair. [. . . . ]


One can only hope! This is legislation that this government, in particular, should not have any say in -- but that is impossible. We have a severely diminished democracy and the government is determined to keep Canadians in the dark.

Search: access reform, Natuashish, same-sex, Senate appointments, Liberal dissent, Auditor General Sheila Fraser's, health-related government foundations, STATUS OF GOVERNMENT BUSINESS





Missing In Action?

Has anyone seen Stephen Harper? -- There's still no conservative alternative February 27, 2005. Linda Williamson, Toronto Sun

It's been almost a year since the Conservative party reunited itself under leader Stephen Harper, who promptly told his cheering members: "There's going to be a takeover: The Conservatives taking over the government of Canada."

Yet last week, the familiar refrain could still be heard throughout the land, on talk radio, in letters to the editor, and among the small-c (and even large-c) conservatives of my acquaintance: "We still don't have a conservative alternative in this country."

Sad but true. And why? [. . . . ]


Canadians are so used to empty bluster that if a leader doesn't regularly produce the requisite bafflegab for the press, if he quietly works in the background,

* getting a newly merged political party in fine shape to fight in the House and in the next election, supervising the organizing, researching and preparing the CPC's approach and policies--convention in Montreal Mar. 17-19,

* allowing excellent MP's to speak and question in the House and to shine in their particular areas of expertise,

the media question whether he is an effective leader. Stephen Harper knows how to delegate, unlike some leaders I could mention who are used to micromanaging, no matter what the balls display was intended to suggest -- that he's laid back and not the controlling street tough I suspect he really is. Oh, did I mention Jean Chretien? Consider it done. The media do not as yet seem to recognize--or do not give credit for the fact--that the Conservative Party of Canada has a political leader who does not tell the underlings what to think and to say -- pronouncing from atop the dung heap -- as has been the case for years.

The Conservatives are working from the bottom up, engaging the membership in preparing policies. Stephen Harper and his troops are quite effective. They will speak -- but first they want to have in order the alternatives they will offer and which the policy convention will make final. Until then, spewing hot air is pointless.

Given the mainstream media's choice to support the status quo and to avoid investigating several items in need of a thorough investigation, the media may feel a trifle guilty at their deal with the Liberal devils -- with a few exceptions some of whom I mention on this site.

The mainstream media is the great maw that has been fed BS sound bites by Liberals for years, hence they didn't have to do much journalistic work, just regurgitate. They do not like the idea of Conservatives, excellent MP's, and bloggers changing the system they know -- the BS, status quo system. Media divorced from Ottawa handouts threaten to upset this neat little system; no wonder the media are annoyed. Many free speaking bloggers support philosophical conservatism and Conservatives and these bloggers threaten the media status quo.

Stephen Harper is subject to mainstream media negativity, whatever he says or does -- and the media complain that he is not front and center for them to get sound bites? Give me a quietly decent non-BS leader any time. I would love to see him as Prime Minister. I am sure the media would be upset but the rest of us might get good government -- if we could recognize it any more.




CFRA -- Ottawa radio online -- today's question

I have been listening this morning to www.cfra.com talk radio -- and the question being tossed about is based on ex-MP John Manley's suggestion that the Liberal party should alternate leaders, not just between a francophone and an anglophone, but between Quebec and TROC. Someone has mentioned a male-female alternative, as well. No-one talks about merit in much of anything any more. I don't know about the rest of the country, but I have had it with Quebeckers as always being catered to. They are less than 1/4 of this country and I am sick of the media taking the pulse of the same group all the time. Quebeckers will never support a Westerner for PM nor for leader of the Liberal party.

If Canadians do not get leaders from anywhere except Quebec soon (PM is a Quebecker, whatever he claims) and if I were a Westerner, I would be working to take the West out of Canada. Good decent people being left out of the equation in almost everything -- for the federal Liberals cater to Quebec and France. They insult our friends the Americans -- among their many negatives; don't forget the corruption.





Canada Free Press and Judi McLeod, one of the journalists who actually digs for information

The fact that the member of the "peaceful" Khadr family was allowed into the country means that honest people don't have a hope in Hades when it comes to their safety. The government has bastardized the laws to such an extent that it leaves Canadians vulnerable to attack from terrorists. This violates the first duty of a government to the country which is to protect its citizens. The fact that the government sees nothing wrong with this issue means they have no morality -- just the raison d'etre of adjusting the levers to make sure they are returned to power with the blessing of the media.

"Email me" returned terrorist invites Canadians Judi McLeod, Canadafreepress.com




What bloggers have to say about Answers.com

Answers.com -- and check where that leads

Gutenberg Project -- books online

Librarian in Black

GuruNet

Utterly Boring and Access to GuruNet is Now Free

Finally, may I plug listening online to classical music at

Washington's Classical 103.5

King.org Classical




U.S. can sit back and watch Europe implode February 27, 2005, Mark Steyn, Chicagl Sun-Times

A week ago, the conventional wisdom was that George W. Bush had seen the error of his unilateral cowboy ways and was setting off to Europe to mend fences with America's ''allies.''

I think not. [. . . . ]



Search: EU ''constitution,'', Euro-bigwigs, their mistresses' decolletage, former French President Valery Giscard d'Estaing, Europe's Jefferson, 511 pages, which is 500 longer than, ratified, CIA analysts



Salim Mansur

Salim Mansur: The tide of freedom February 26, 2005, Toronto Sun

Shakespeare's Brutus declares, "There is a tide in the affairs of men," and its meaning, when properly grasped, opens new chapters in human history.

The abiding tide in human affairs is that of freedom, sometimes receding and at other times in full flood. [. . . . ]

The Budget 2005: Chapter 6 -- "Meeting our Global Responsibilities" -- the chapter with security information -- Note what is emphasized in chapter 6

In the last ten years, the government has taken $22 billion out of the military and security. Now, they are putting back in $12 billion for the military and $1 billion for security -- over five years -- with maybe $750-million going in this year. Only in Canada does that make it look like an increase.

If the government hadn't squandered $1 billion on the gun registry, the military could have received $1.75-billion in the first year.

The whole charade goes on and on and on . . . ad infinitum. With the $750 million, Canada's security will be lucky to keep up with inflation, pay salaries to make sure high tech troops don't leave, keep some military families out of food banks and make sure their quarters don't leak.



Planning and Organizing NOW! Money over FIVE YEARS -- Number of Actual Human Beings Added to Security -- shrouded in budgetary bafflegab

Make a guess. It is very difficult to figure it out but the language of this chapter is of:

planning, talking, over five years, establishment of, roundtable, border infrastructure (Public Works?), begin work on initiatives, assess . . .


Budget 2005, Chapter 6: Meeting our Global Responsibilities - the chapter with security information

This chapter includes several aspects before it gets to what we usually think of as protecting Canadians' security. Search the acronyms RCMP and CSIS in this document (available on the government website) and see what you find. I think you will be surprised. Some Chapter 6 information is set in eye-catching blocks. Note what is highlighted on the government website. The budget is nothing if not timely in appealing to citizens over the new year 2005 global concern, the tsunami.

In looking at Chapter 6, my first impression was that there is much more emphasis on the "global" than on the "national" and this chapter seems heavily weighted in emphasis toward trade and business. For example, there is a preponderance of lanhguage having to do with talking, conferring, organizing without much action:

auditing of federal department business continuity plans, action plan for assessing, "sends a strong message", assessment and development of systems


Does the following, admittedly a personal selection, give a sense of security at home -- of enhanced security including officers--human beings with the intuitive powers of trained officers--on the ground in Canada protecting Canadians?

deployment of officers to overseas ports, enhance Canada’s competitiveness, contribute to a more equitable, sustainable, and democratic world, and help protect Canadians, renew the Public Diplomacy Program, an important instrument to gain greater influence for Canada internationally


And now to my personal choices, what stood out to me in Chapter 6: Meeting our Global Responsibilities

I have set the material that was in blocks on the government webset off visually here in block quotes and italicized them.




Setting a New Course for Canada’s International Policy

[. . . . ] Global citizenship: reflecting Canadians’ desire to make a difference in the world.[. . . . ]

Responding to the South Asia Tsunami

Matching Contributions for Tsunami Relief

[. . . . ] Eligible organizations are required to submit proposals, and independently audited statements on the funds they raised, to the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA). These audited statements will be used to determine the amount of donations the Government will match. [. . . . ]

[. . . . ] The matched funds will be disbursed over time, . . .


Helping the Poorest of the World

[Check the chart, New Resources for International Assistance]

[. . . . ] Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) [. . . . Make a guess as to what this is about.]

Recent Canadian Action on Debt Relief [facts and figures]

Canada’s Commitment to Africa [CIDA?]

[. . . . ] health and economic development . . . . announcing $300 million in additional funding for The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria ($140 million), and the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) ($160 million).

[. . . . ] $42 million in funding to support the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI)

Additional Funds for Peace and Security

[. . . ] Canada Corps will engage Canadians in helping to improve governance in fragile or failed states [. . . . ] [My cynicism kicks in here. NJC]

Nurturing a Prosperous Private Sector in Developing Countries

[. . . ] Prime Minister Paul Martin and former Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo recognized this, and called on the global community to act in their UN report, "Unleashing Entrepreneurship." [I see open borders / open immigration coming, though the language will be about free trade -- too cynical of me? NJC]

Canada will do more to enable developing countries, particularly African countries, to build their private sectors, make markets work for the poor, and to compete globally. The Government will also encourage additional incentives for Canadian firms to do business in Africa in a way that better considers each community’s social and economic development issues. The Martin-Zedillo report provides a solid foundation upon which to build support and determine the approaches that will best help African entrepreneurs. An important example is the Canada Investment Fund for Africa (CIFA), which aims to channel at least $200 million in private investment into Africa. An initial $100 million allocation was set aside for this initiative, designed to provide risk capital for investment in Africa.

The Forum of Federations [What is this? What is its mandate?]
Better Management of Canada’s International Assistance



[Note that all of that came before security--I omitted much but the emphasis in this chapter is not on the defence of Canadians and Canadians' interests! Read the whole thing for the preponderance of other things that seem to matter more than Canadians. ]

Strengthening National Defence to Meet New Commitments [the military -- The news media have covered this but I do have one item.

A digression:

Martin's Past Choices Create Dire Consequences for Canadian Military says MP Jay Hill on the occasion of Paul Martin's sending Canadian troops to Haiti, March 5, 2004

Fort St. John, BC - Senior National Defence Critic for the Official Opposition, Jay Hill . . . . "Paul Martin cut the Canadian Forces so deep when he was finance minister that now we're scraping the bone. [. . . . ]

"He can't have it both ways," Hill added. "The Prime Minister can't brag to Canadians that he slew the deficit yet not take responsibility for the impact of his $20-billion in cuts to Canada's military. The Canadian Forces needs an immediate infusion of cash for equipment, recruitment and training in order to adequately respond to the next international or domestic crisis."
[. . . . ]


End of digression



Ensuring the Security of Canadians

[. . . .] The past three federal budgets have allocated more than $8.3 billion to this effort, beginning with $7.7 billion provided in Budget 2001 for a range of new security measures. Improvements have been made in air and marine security, intelligence and policing, emergency preparedness and response, and border security and border infrastructure. Budgets 2003 and 2004 together provided an additional $680 million for the security reserve created in Budget 2001. These additional funds have supported a number of measures, such as the Smart Border Action Plan and other projects identified in Canada’s National Security Policy.

National Security Policy

[. . . .] $690 million in new investments to enhance the Government’s capacity in intelligence gathering and the protection of critical government systems and infrastructure. Other key NSP initiatives include the establishment of an integrated threat assessment centre and a government operations centre, the creation of health emergency response teams, and measures to enhance marine security.

[. . . .] over $1 billion [. . . .] in the areas of emergency planning and response, transportation and border security, and in increasing Canada’s international presence.

[. . . .] improve national readiness in the event of a pandemic influenza emergency.

[. . . .] purchase antivirals, a further $34 million, over five years,[. . . .]

Emergency Management

[. . . .] proposed integration of the Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection and Emergency Preparedness (OCIPEP) into the new Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada (PSEPC), [. . . ] a single organization that can respond to both terrorist and other emergencies. . . implementation of Canada’s National Security Policy, [. . . .] PSEPC would be in a better position to assess Canadian emergency response and management capacity requirements.
[. . . .] resources to begin work on initiatives that are key to the effective emergency management of the future.

Budget 2005 provides $56 million in funding over five years for emergency management initiatives, such as the federal-provincial-territorial forum on emergencies. [. . . .] Cross-Cultural Roundtable [. . . .] secret communications between disparate players that could be required to inter-operate in emergencies. [. . . .] enable auditing of federal department business continuity plans to begin,[. . . .] Natural Resources Canada [. . . .] action plan for assessing the vulnerability of critical cross-border energy facilities, and to implement the recommendations of the Canada-U.S. Task Force on the 2003 Power Outage. [. . . .] collaboration among researchers [. . . .] on science and technology as it relates to critical infrastructure vulnerability and protection against chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear threats. . . . $16 million over five years to develop a capacity to lead this collaboration and align federal, industry and academic science and technology (S&T) activities.

Financial Crime and Terrorist Financing

[. . . ] sends a strong message to G-7 and other international partners . . . Canada intends to seek the presidency of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), . . . will actively participate in other regional bodies such as the Asia-Pacific Group on Money Laundering and the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force. The Government will ensure adequate and ongoing funding for membership in these international bodies and for necessary evaluations of the effectiveness of our national regime. This is expected to cost about $3 million over the next five years.

[. . . .] a consultation paper proposing legislative and regulatory changes to implement recent revisions to the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) standards.

[. . .] Financial Transactions Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) [ . . .]

Money laundering and terrorist financing activities often involve intricate networks of financial transactions. As a result of its ability to trace such networks, FINTRAC made almost 200 disclosures to law enforcement and intelligence agencies of suspected money laundering and terrorist financing activities last year. More than 40 of these were related to suspected terrorist financing activities


Proceeds of Crime

Through the Integrated Proceeds of Crime (POC) initiative, RCMP investigators and the Department of Justice Canada legal counsel—as well as investigators from several federal departments and agencies—work with municipal, provincial and international partners in integrated teams across the country. These teams help to seize profits and assets from criminal organizations [. . . ] $117 million over the next five years for this purpose.

[. . .] $2.2 billion in Budget 2001 for an enhanced Canadian air travel security system, the creation of the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority, and the strengthening of Transport Canada’s regulatory, monitoring and inspection capacities. The Public Safety Act (2002) is an additional tool for detecting, assessing and responding to air security threats. Budget 2005 allocates $16 million over the next five years to this measure for the assessment and development of systems to collect information about air travellers for national security purposes.

Air Travellers Security Charge

[. . . ] Air Travellers Security Charge (ATSC) [. . . .] reductions are proposed: for air travel within Canada, to $5 from $6 for one-way travel and to $10 from $12 for round-trip travel; for transborder air travel, to $8.50 from $10; and for other international air travel, to $17 from $20. [. . . .]

Marine Security

The Government of Canada is committed to maintaining a strong economy and excellent trading relationships through a secure marine transportation system. Since 2001, the Government has dedicated $630 million for projects improving marine security in Canada, including measures to protect marine infrastructure, increase the surveillance of maritime traffic, and improve Canada’s capability to respond to emergency situations.

[. . .] $222 million over five years to further enhance the security of the country’s marine transportation system. Funds will go towards a series of initiatives, including new mid-shore patrol vessels for the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence Seaway, additional regulatory inspections, the creation of Emergency Response Teams for the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence Seaway, and an increased police presence in ports.

Container Security Initiative

. . . $88 million over five years [. . . ] Container Security Initiative (CSI), as well as to increase the compatibility of our systems for automated targeting and sharing of information on high-risk cargo [. . .] develop intelligence, share critical information and verify inspections on containers . . . enable Canada to participate in, and benefit from, the CSI through the deployment of officers to overseas ports.

Security of Embassies and Consulates

[. . . .] enhanced security measures at Canada’s foreign embassies and consulates. The Government will invest $59 million over the next five years. . .

Border Security

[. . . ] Canada will work with the United States and Mexico to increase the security of critical transportation and communications networks, [. . . .] $433 million over five years to strengthen the Government’s capacity to deliver secure and efficient border services.

Strengthening the Capacity of the Foreign Service

Canada needs a strong network of highly skilled diplomatic officers in its embassies and consulates to enhance Canada’s competitiveness, contribute to a more equitable, sustainable, and democratic world, and help protect Canadians [. . . .] $42 million over five years to begin deploying more foreign service officers from Canada to embassies and consulates abroad. It also provides $40 million over five years to renew the Public Diplomacy Program, an important instrument to gain greater influence for Canada internationally. [Paying heed to some of our friends such as the US about terrorist groups and triad members who have been allowed into Canada would make more sense. Our government should do something about the problem. No wonder our influence has waned. Canada is a haven for criminals and terrorists. NJC]


Setting New Trade and Investment Priorities

Enhancing Our Relationships With Overseas Markets

Canada-India partnership to foster science and technology cooperation . . . promote trade and investment

China -- enhancing our partnership in the areas of multilateral cooperation, natural resources and energy, and trade and investment—including the facilitation of bilateral trade and investment

Japan -- to enhance trade and economic cooperation. The framework will be structured to focus on strategic priorities—including policy dialogue, facilitation and promotion of trade and investment, and regulatory cooperation, with a focus on enhancing both countries’ capacities in innovation and knowledge-based economy.

European Union -- negotiating a Trade and Investment Enhancement Agreement with the European Union to invigorate its economic relationship with traditional European partners.

Budget 2005 provides $20 million over five years to support new international science and technology (S&T) initiatives . . . India and China. . . . promote collaborative research between Canadian and foreign scientists and technologists . . . the use of cleaner and more efficient forms of energy . . . helping brand Canadian environmental technology abroad.

Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada -- [. . . .] an endowment of $50 million. . . to build networks between Canadian and Asian business leaders, and to unearth potential market opportunities that will benefit both regions. In order to improve and reflect modern governance and accountability practices, the Government will undertake to amend the 1984 Asia-Pacific Foundation of Canada Act. [Check that "foundation" and the act by which it came into being.]


* * *

Budget 2005 makes significant investments to advance Canada’s interests and project Canadian values around the globe. It delivers on commitments to double international assistance by 2010–11 and takes immediate action to alleviate the debt burden of poor countries and to combat global poverty and health challenges. In particular, the Government has increased its focus on Africa, where the development challenges are the greatest.

[. . . .] increase military personnel by making additional investments in the military, including equipment. [. . . .] global peace operations and crisis response. [. . . .] this budget affirms the importance that Canada places an increasing trade and investment in key emerging economies.

[. . . .] Canadian values as a guide [. . . .]

Table 6.2

Meeting Our Global Responsibilities [Note the years covered in this table. You cannot assess what is not there -- the figures since the Jean Chretien Liberals came to power in 1993. This puts a whole new meaning to "over the next five years". Also, see "Related" below.]

Ensuring the security of Canadians -- Total after five years: 1,009 (millions of dollars)

Helping the poorest of the world -- Total after five years: 3,436 (millions of dollars)

Canada’s commitment to Africa -- Total after five years: 342 (millions of dollars)

Strengthening National Defence -- 2004-2005 to 2009-2010, over each of the five years

500, 600, 1,100, 2,125, 2,675 (millions of dollars)

Total after five years: 7,000 (millions of dollars)


Ensuring the security of Canadians -- including:

Emergency management -- Total after five years: 72 (millions of dollars)

Combatting financial crime -- Total after five years: 120 (millions of dollars)

Transportation security -- Total after five years: 326 (millions of dollars)

Security at missions abroad -- Total after five years: 59 (millions of dollars)

Border security1 [1 Funding for 2008–09 and 2009–10 will be subject to the completion of an A-base review.] -- Total after five years: 433 (millions of dollars)

Total after five years: 433 (millions of dollars)


Strengthening the capacity of the foreign service -- Total after five years: 82 (millions of dollars)

Setting new trade and investment priorities -- Total after five years: 20 (millions of dollars)



End of the excerpts from the budget 2005.

Related:

Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada -- Business News and more

The Foundation was established in 1984 by an Act of the Parliament of Canada. It has its headquarters in Vancouver, British Columbia.

APF Canada receives financial support from Foreign Affairs Canada, the Canadian International Development Agency and Western Economic Diversification Canada.


What was the impetus for setting up this foundation? Who initiated it? There is much high power concentration. Follow the money and the networks
.


Check some past posts:

Updates & China Conference-Vancouver Port, Maurice Strong-China Car Salesman, China's Bricklin & Strong, China-Copied Chevy Design?

Search the page for any of the following:

* Update 2: Maurice Strong

* Judi McLeod: "Environmental car salesman of 2005: Maurice Strong, Meet George W. Bush"

* First Chinese cars to hit U.S. shores -- Malcolm Bricklin, the man behind the Yugo, to lead new import wave in 2007. -- Maurice Strong member of Bricklin's team -- a NB connection here

* Maurice Strong, chairman of Visionary Vehicles' Technology and Environmental Advisory Board. He is a former senior adviser to U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan and adviser to the president of the World Bank. [among other things -- scroll down.

* Chinese carmaker ambitious, controversial -- GM has accused Chery Automobile Co. of copying Chevy design, plans to sue.

Canada's Prime Minister, the Industry Minister, assorted other government lads, hangers-on and the big corporations which have received Canadian taxpayers' $$$ largesse over the years are pushing China's interests in--designs upon-Canada's resources, research and development, various companies. . .


* Business: The China Connection, Canada China Business Council--Founding Sponsors, the Networks, Connections & Other Information

* Canada China Business Council (CCBC) -- its mandate

Mandate: The Canada China Business Council (CCBC) is a private-sector, non-profit membership organization incorporated in 1978 to facilitate and promote trade and investment between Canada and the People's Republic of China.


* Founding Sponsors [This list -- includes: Desmarais and Maurice Strong, Li Ka-Shing and many more]

February 27, 2005

Budgetary Tour de Farce

Philosophical Underpinnings to the Budget 2005 -- "a new experiment in central planning"

Terence Corcoran: Groping in the dark with Ralph Goodale Financial Post, Feb. 26, 05

In providing a scientific basis for the current administration of the capitalist economy, "bourgeois" economics had developed a theory of equilibrium which can also serve as a basis for the current administration of a socialist economy.; -- Oskar Lange (1904-65), former chairman of the Polish State Economic Council, sometime Stalinist and major contributor to the economics of socialism

[. . . . ] The appendix, known as Annex 4 to the budget, lacks footnotes and references, so there are no obvious sources for the ideas, none of which can be remotely called innocent. All can be traced back by pedigree to [. . . . ]

[. . . . Do not miss Corcoran's exploration of what Annex 4 tells Canadians. . . .]

In a market economy, decisions emerge on the basis of prices and circumstances that are beyond any planner's ability to comprehend. "Under socialism," said Mises, "there is only groping in the dark. [. . . . ]

[. . . . ] "The government intends to go further, and will do so in successive budgets," setting the stage for a new experiment in central planning. Groping in the dark -- the next generation.





Andrew Coyne's Graph which accompanies his explanation of the budget splurge -- Andrew Coyne on the Budget: A splurge without precedent February 26, 2005

The real cost of that $30-billion is the other purposes to which it might have been put -- namely, cutting taxes. Total federal personal income tax revenues this year will come to $90-billion. So we are talking about a one third cut in taxes that could have been made, and wasn’t.

And the worst of it is: we were never told any of this in advance. Every year’s budget projected mild growth in spending two years out, and every year’s budget revised the previous year’s estimate upwards, usually to the tune of billions of dollars. The 2004 budget was only the last, and most flagrant, in a series.





We've become a nation of enablers -- "Clearly, then, Canadian taxpayers are in an abusive relationship with the federal Liberals" -- brilliantly done! Lorrie Goldstein, Toronto Sun, Feb. 27, 05

The longer the federal Liberals stay in power, the more they resemble an abusive husband and father lording it over his family. With the family being the rest of us.

Consider the similarities, regardless of whether Jean Chretien, or now, Paul Martin, happens to be in charge:

* The first thing an abuser typically does in order to gain control of his wife and children [. . . . ]





Budgets would make Kafka blush Andrew Coyne, National Post, February 24, 2005

OTTAWA - The thing you have to remember about federal budgets is that they don't actually mean anything. That isn't to say they mean nothing: that would be far too specific. They aren't devoid of meaning, they're beside it. They exist in a world where the very concept of meaning is meaningless. [. . . . ]






Budget: Private-sector forecasters disagree on size of surplus

Private-sector forecasters disagree on size of surplus Eric Beauchesne, CanWest

OTTAWA - Two of three private-sector forecasters, hired by the Commons finance committee, say the federal government has a lot more money to play with than it admits. [. . . . ] Conference Board of Canada economist Paul Darby projected surpluses, including all contingency funds, of $7.6-billion next year, and $8.8-billion the year after. Jim Stanford, an economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, predicted surpluses of $11.4-billion and then $13.1-billion. [. . . . ]





Budget: Editorial -- "Grateful for $1.33? No way!"

Editorial: Grateful for $1.33? No way! Feb. 23, 05, Toronto Sun

[. . . . ] Most of the budget's big spending is set far in the future, five years down the road -- provided we all keep voting Liberal, of course.

[. . . . ] But for average taxpayers, there's nothing to cheer here -- not when the tax cut amounts to $1.33 a month.

[. . . . ] As national politics columnist Greg Weston reports today, Goodale and Martin are now taking some $14 billion from taxpayers to spend through some foundation or the like, sometime in the future. That's outrageous overtaxation -- to the tune of at least $1,000 per taxpayer, per year.

Where is that money going? What is the plan? What else would you expect from Prime Minister Dithers? [. . . . ]

RCMP Underfunded, Undermanned -- Marijuana Grow Ops Spread -- Yet Government Won't Address the Problem -- Why? MP Chuck Cadman CPC on the Grow Ops

Closing an RCMP lab? Government has been awash in cash -- sponsorship, gun registry, etc. Why don't they cut out the waste and corruption before closing an RCMP forensic lab? But this is just one problem.

The RCMP are short a minimun 2500 officers yet the government has allowd the closing up to 9 detachments in marijuana growing areas of Quebec. The cases are already backed up and others put on the back burner for lack of funding.

The government has done all in its power to give carte blanche to major criminal organizations. Just look at the dismal track record. The crooks are carrying on $25 billion in crimial operations; very few make it to court and the government has handcuffed the police. Why? Who is making money from all this? The government has repeatedly been told of the situation, particularly with grow ops, and has done little or acted so as to prevent the RCMP from having what they need to get the job done. Why?

Why have the mainstream media ignored the extent of this problem?


Who will make money if marijuana is legalized, as seems to be in the offing? Does anyone remember the illegal gambling in the Maritimes? I have heard, but do not know whether it is true, that governments, unable to do much that was effective in stopping it, gave up. Governments then legalized gambling--was it machines, at first? The "industry" has burgeoned since government got in on the money by taxing it. But what happened to those who were already involved? Did they make money? Do they now?

Would the same thing be coming with marijuana? In the effort to legalize marijuana, is it not relevant that the people involved already are mainly criminal gangs and the profits realized go into other criminal activities, including terrorism? Would everyone who fondly remembers the apparently harmless joint they smoked in their callow youth consider the consequences of decriminalizing or legalization today? Much more has entered the equation than an herb growing in the back yard. Scroll down for Chuck Cadman's address to Parliament on this.


Grits sharpen axe stephanie Rubec, Parliamentary News Bureau, Sun Media, Feb. 25, 05

The Liberal government will slash programs, cut about 2,840 jobs and mothball equipment over the next five years to help pay for Finance Minister Ralph Goodale's budget spending spree. Few departments will be spared the axe, which will carve $11 billion out of programs by 2010.

The cost-saving measures will see one of six RCMP forensic labs closed and as of Tuesday, Canada's air transport complaints commissioner was out of a job.

To boost revenue, the Liberal government will hire collection agencies to recover debts owed to Human Resources, Social Development and Industry Canada.

[. . . . ] Revenue Minister John McCallum, who led the expenditure review, . . . . pointed out that 40% of Goodale's new priorities were funded by the savings found in his expenditure review -- except the $75-billion health care and equalization deal cut with the provinces which was funded by the surplus. [. . . . ]




There are at least 50,000 grow ops in Canada, let alone all the other illegal drugs. One would assume that there would be major busts every week -- if the RCMP were properly funded. That's not the case. Does it matter?

What is an acceptable level of corruption? The government may not have found it yet.


Hansard: Mr. Chuck Cadman (Surrey North, CPC): Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise to debate Bill C-10, this government's feeble attempt to address the possession and production of marijuana in Canada.

(1310) [. . . . ] Mr. Chuck Cadman (Surrey North, CPC): Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise to debate Bill C-10, this government's feeble attempt to address the possession and production of marijuana in Canada.

At times Canadians must wonder if the government is even aware of the problems of marijuana grow ops in Canada. I have tried for some time now to make these Liberals aware of the extent of the problem in my constituency of Surrey North.

In Surrey alone, an estimated 3,500 to 4,500 grow ops generate, conservatively estimated, in excess of $2 billion per year.
B.C. bud goes into the United States as currency for guns and cocaine. These grow ops are run by violent criminal gangs and many are located in residential neighbourhoods where there are plenty of children. I continue to receive letters, e-mails and phone calls from constituents who are extremely angry that too little is being done.

The criminal intelligence directorate of the RCMP issued a report, “Marijuana Cultivation in Canada”, in November 2002. In 2001, Canadian police seized close to $1.4 million marijuana plants, a six-fold increase since 1993. In 2002, 54 million grams of bulk marijuana were seized, up from 28 million in 2001. This phenomenal increase in the illegal production of marijuana occurred under this government's watch while the current Prime Minister held the purse strings on funding that could have addressed the problem long before now.

The RCMP told the former solicitor general that grow ops had reached “epidemic proportions”--that is their wording--and that resources to take them down were an issue.


Innocent lives are at risk here. We have had drive-by shootings, assaults and murders. Neighbours frequently have their homes violently invaded in so-called grow rips, when the bad guys get the wrong address.

Why do we not see any resources directly targeting marijuana grow operations and why is there not a strategy in place? This is out of control.

The former solicitor general called the problem serious and admitted it should be challenged head on. He said, “We do have to do more”. He said that he had raised the matter with the former minister of finance, the current Prime Minister. At that time, he declared that in the next few weeks the government would bring forward proposals that, in his words, “will in a more comprehensive fashion challenge the grow operations, to increase penalties and take them down”.

Bill C-10 falls woefully short of that promise.

The current maximum sentence for growing marijuana is seven years. The bill we are debating proposes increasing the maximum sentence to 14 years, but only for more than 50 plants. The maximum sentence for growing four to 25 plants will actually be reduced to five years. That is shocking. We are reducing sentences while international organized crime is increasingly establishing grow ops in Canada due to our already lax laws and lenient sentences.

Besides, with penalties still at the discretion of the courts, what is the point of increasing maximum sentences when they rarely, if ever, come close to imposing the current maximums?
With no set mandatory minimum sentences, we will continue to see judges giving far less than the maximum penalties for cultivation. If the government were truly serious about combatting grow ops, it would have instituted mandatory minimum jail sentences and more effective proceeds of crime legislation.

This legislation is great news for organized crime. The November 2002 RCMP criminal intelligence directorate report declared that high profits, a low risk of being caught and lenient sentences are spurring the epidemic of marijuana grow ops in Canada. It states:

Police resources are now being taxed to the point where difficult choices must be made when faced with competing priorities.


This explains why law enforcement agencies are unable to make a lasting impact on the marijuana cultivation industry in Canada. Huge profits from illegal marijuana growing are often used by organized crime, in the words of the report “to finance other illicit activities, such as the importation of Ecstasy, liquid hashish and cocaine”.

The number of illegal marijuana operations is rising so fast that some Canadian police agencies are being overwhelmed, the RCMP report said, stating that:

In some parts of the country, the phenomenon has reached epidemic proportions.

I have been asking questions in the House for some time now about the government's lack of effort to take down marijuana grow ops.


In the spring of 2003, the former solicitor general visited Surrey to examine the problem, in part, by his own admission, because of questions I had asked in this place. To this point in time, neither my constituents nor I have seen any action from the government. I commented at the time that his visit was just a grow op photo op. It now appears as though that is all it was.

In August 2003, another RCMP criminal intelligence unit report said that organized crime is extending its marijuana grow op reach clear across Canada by merging with biker gangs.

"Free" Speech, Shivs? Daycare, Propotional Representation, The Valedictorian-Saudi Soldier, Diplomatic Immunity, Little Guy JC, Media, Innu Parents &

The following gives a more complete idea of what is in this post.

"Free" Speech, Shivs Being Sharpened? Daycare as Subsidizing Counter-productive Uses of Labour, PR as Power Sharing Coalitions, The Valedictorian-a Saudi Soldier, Diplomatic Immunity, Little Guy from the Street Gang, The Media, Innu Parents Padlock School, Let it Bleed: on the CPC, Liberals will rule forever


The Universities: Centers for Intellectual Exploration of Ideas through "Free" Speech -- or Stalinist "re-education"?

Robert Fulford: Harvard's "Summers performs the loyalty dance" -- "a self-criticism meeting" -- 'free' speech

[. . . . ] The incident adds up, one way and another, to a defeat for free speech and honest inquiry at the heart of American academic life. To paraphrase a famous statement about the persistence of evil: All it takes for stupidity to triumph is for those who know the truth to remain silent in the face of proud ignorance. [. . . . ]





Are the Liberal Shivs Being Sharpened?

That's my prognostication. For the PM -- chicanery on the way up -- shivs on the way down.

All eyes on Ignatieff Peter C. Newman, National Post, Feb. 26, 05

[. . . . ] The real star at [next week's Liberal convention ] the gathering will be Michael Ignatieff, who has been asked to deliver the keynote address. [. . . . ]

Liberal kingmakers often ignore the clamouring of ambitious Cabinet members and opt instead to pluck from obscurity an untried but inspiring outsider.

That's political sorcery of the highest order. Instead of having to defend the corruption and patronage of the ancien regime, the freshly-minted leader can innocently declare: "Who me? What Sponsorship Scandal? This is moi, a new guy with new ideas."

Thus does discontinuity rule. [. . . . ]





Ken Dryden's daycare boondoogle -- a letter -- Daycare "subsidizes counter-productive uses of labour" National Post, February 26, 2005 [Sorry, I lost the link -- or never got it. Check the letters page. ]

Re: Parents Need More Than Tax Credits, letter to the editor, Feb. 25.
In regards to Kim Adamson's letter calling for more subsidies for daycares, if both parents have careers, they earn enough to pay for their own daycare. If they have low-paying jobs and can't afford daycare, then their labour would be more efficiently employed by having one parent look after the kids at home. [. . . . ]






"Unlike companies that compete in producing numerous products and services for niche markets, political parties in PR systems collude through power-sharing coalitions that agree on a common government policy or program"

Lawrence Solomon: Vote for experimentation and change -- Proportional Representation Feb. 26, 05, Financial Post

Lawrence Solomon is executive director of Urban Renaissance Institute and Consumer Policy Institute, divisions of Toronto-based Energy Probe Research Foundation. (Andrew Coyne is a member of the board of Energy Probe.) www.Urban-Renaissance.org

Proportional representation has the virtues of the marketplace, my friend and colleague at the National Post, Andrew Coyne, stated earlier this week in criticizing Canada's current winner-take-all electoral system. "One of the great things about markets is that the majority doesn't rule," he wrote. "I don't have to buy the shoes that most people like: I can buy the shoes that I like. If 5% of the population prefers that kind of shoes, 5% of the market is what they get." [. . . . ]




On Proportional Representation, Andrew Coyne wrote PR: as simple as one person, one vote -- or Original article: Moving past first-past-the-post Andrew Coyne, National Post, February 23, 2005

[. . . . ] What is, or should be, that basic unit? Let me suggest one that has several centuries of philosophical spadework in its favour: not ridings or parties, but the individual. That's why we give every person one vote. It's the basis of [. . . . ]


Search: "What's so special about political parties, anyway?", "What's so special about ridings?", "seats apportioned by race or gender"



Also, Coyne is simply brilliant when he can appeal to the funny bone while writing on "equalization".

The new equalization: from all, to all on www.andrewcoyne.com. The original article was in the National Post here The new equalization from all to all -- Everyone thinks he can improve upon equality. National Post, Andrew Coyne, Feb. 16, 05.

Everyone thinks he can improve upon equality. Everybody's got a better idea. Locke and Hume and Mill might have been all right in their day, but that doesn't mean we can't help them out a little, with our greater understanding of the complexities of life. Naive, undomesticated types who cling to the ideal of equality in its original sense, equality as equal treatment, are sent away with an indulgent smile and that quote about the law forbidding princes and paupers alike from sleeping under bridges.

Well, we certainly can't be accused of that, can we? Not in this country, where every case is special and every circumstance is unique -- unique, not in the way that other circumstances are unique, but unique in a uniquely unique way that makes it an exception to all the other exceptions. Consider, for example [. . . . ]






The Valedictorian

SAUDI 'SOLDIER' Stephen Schwartz, Feb. 24, 05
Stephen Schwartz is the author of "The Two Faces of Islam."

IN Alexandria, Va., on Tuesday, a 23-year-old Northern Virginia man of Saudi Arabian background named Ahmed Omar Abu Ali was charged with conspiring to assassinate President Bush.

Abu Ali and his accomplices are accused of plotting to kill the president by gunfire or a car bomb. The indictment also spells out such criminal activities as assisting and receiving support from Osama bin Laden's band of murderers.

Abu Ali was extradited to Virginia after many months in a Saudi jail. What's most remarkable about this case is the degree to which this would-be assassin is a Saudi creation.

In 1999, Ahmed Omar Abu Ali was the valedictorian for the Islamic Saudi Academy (ISA), a K-12 school with campuses in Fairfax and Alexandria, Va., that is directly controlled by the Royal Saudi Embassy in Washington. [. . . . ]


Search: textbook for 6-year-olds, Christianity and Judaism, de facto Saudi state religion, saudiinstitute.org "a network of born Muslims and American converts to Islam, headed by convert Randall (Ismail) Royer.", paintball jihad, fled to Saudi Arabia, freedoms, conspiracy




"Promises to crack down on misbehaving dips have fallen by the wayside thanks to a series of weak foreign ministers"

Stuck with diplomats behaving badly Greg Weston, February 22, 2005, Sun Ottawa Bureau

[. . . . ] I had a similar run-in with Foreign Affairs over a year ago when officials stalled my request for incident reports for almost four months. After kicking up a fuss in the minister's office, I finally got a three-line report which Ottawa police later said bore no relation to the actual diplomatic incidents for that period. (In short, officials were either incompetent or lying.)

[. . . . ] "Further, I have learned that another member of the (same embassy) with diplomatic immunity, was most recently accused of breaching Canadian law, and has been charged with uttering death threats, as well as obstructing and assaulting a peace officer." [. . . . ]






Little Guy from the Street Gang

The secret life of prime ministers Greg Weston, Feb. 20, 05, Sun Ottawa Bureau

A ferocious five-year legal battle costing taxpayers millions of dollars may soon solve one of the great political mysteries of our time:

What the heck was Jean Chretien really doing all those years he was sitting in the Prime Minister's Office?

After five years of duking it out with government lawyers, federal Information Commissioner John Reid has finally ruled that Chretien's prime ministerial appointment agendas can and should be made public under the Access to Information Act.

[. . . . ] That's when Chretien and his gang of publicly paid Justice Department bullies started beating up on Reid.

[. . . . ] If Reid does finally prevail and Chretien's agendas are released, it will certainly be interesting to see who was meeting with the former PM, especially during the years he knew absolutely nothing about the Adscam fiasco.
[. . . . ]




Klaus Rohrich: Why the Liberals will rule forever February 24, 2005

Klaus Rohrich is President and Creative Director of Taylor/Rohrich Associates Inc., a marketing and advertising firm that specializes in niche marketing residential real estate developments www.trmarketing.com. Email: letters@canadafreepress.com.

We are now in the 12th year of the Liberals’ rule and it’s beginning to feel more like a dynasty than a government. I don’t often encounter people who tell me that they like the Liberals or that they voted for them or that they agree with anything they do. Over the past decade, there have been scandals plaguing the party that appear to be too numerous to recount here, but suffice it to say that they provide ample evidence that Liberals are helping themselves to taxpayers’ money to achieve self-enhancing goals and abusing power. Yet election after election they manage to get back in.

It occurred to me that one of the reasons they manage to do so is that they have a powerful ally in the so-called mainstream media, which allows them to cover up their misdeeds or mitigate their severity if they can’t be hidden. Like their U.S. counterpart, Canada’s mainstream media is largely left leaning and will do anything, no matter how unsavory to ensure that the federal government does not fall into conservative hands. [. . . . ]


Search: passing grades, same-sex marriage, feminists, double standard, And That’s The Way It Isn’t, Centre for Media Affairs, study of attitudes, CRTC’s decision, middle of the road, kissing cousins, Canadian Media

Now, the PM has just appointed a friend to head the CRTC. This Mr. French (check for his first name) will know on which side his perqs are greased.




Innu parents padlock doors of school to protest education system CP, Feb. 26, 05

SHESHATSHIU, Nfld. (CP) - Innu parents padlocked the doors of the school in this Labrador community Friday, saying the provincial education system is failing their children.

The parents say they won't take the locks off until the province promises to improve the dismal educational record of Labrador Innu.

[. . . . ] Sheshatshiu is one of two Innu communities in Labrador. Very few Innu have graduated from high school and the dropout rate remains extremely high.

The study by Dr. David Philpott of Memorial University of St. John's found that 35 per cent of Innu children never attend school.
[. . . . ]


If nothing has been done about this problem, how did PM Paul Martin get an agreement with an Innu chief on land claims? Did he give away the store? How did PM get the chief on side? Should one not ask?





Let it Bleed Blog: "nobody else has really asked them to dance" via Canada Free Press Blog

It's tempting to look at the latest poll numbers and start muttering about media hostility, a duped public, Liberal perfidy, etc., etc., ad nauseum. Why do more people like Mr. Dithers than Mr. Harper? It isn't because Canadians are dedicated to North Korean style health care. It isn't because they love being taxed to death. They don't seem particularly enamored of Paul's "stand" on homosexual "marriage". It isn't even because most journalists are left of centre. The Conservative Party has many policies that would be attractive to Canadians if it could only get them to pay attention.[. . . . ]

And let's be clear here: if you weren't here to experience it, you cannot begin to imagine how hostile the dominant media were to the Mike Harris Tories. But they not only won back-to-back majorities, they increased their share of the popular vote the second time around.

[. . . . ] At times it seems like the CPC is gunshy about explicitly stating its policies for fear of media disapproval. Get over it. They already hate you. But if you don't give the public a chance to figure out what you're going to do once in power, then you give the media (and their preferred political actors) the chance to define the debate [. . . . ]

Divorcing Marriage: “The Casualties”

What if changing the definition of marriage does harm, enormous harm, to everyone else?

This came from someone who cares about the family; you may write your own and/or use this to support maintaining the definition of marriage as it has been -- traditional marriage -- or do nothing at all.

An Open Letter to Jim Prentice, MP for Calgary Centre North, From His Constituents Urging Him to Reconsider His Support of the Government’s Bill to Legalize Same Sex Marriage, February 23, 2005

In your widely-publicized statement on same-sex marriage, you ask the question: “What right do we as a society have to refuse gay Canadians something that the rest of us are entitled to – namely, a civil marriage licence.” You continue, saying that we have no such right, “…provided that they do no harm to anyone else.” Thus far, we’re inclined to agree with you. But what if changing the definition of marriage does harm, enormous harm, to everyone else?

The potential for harm from this radical social experiment to redefine marriage is clearly set out in a collection of essays by Canadian academics with expertise in law, sociology and politics. We are advised that the published compilation of their warnings, the book Divorcing Marriage, has been sent to each Member of Parliament. Have you read it?

Evidently not, or you wouldn’t be making the no-harm argument. Why not read it? Surely you haven’t closed your mind. You, who have the courage to take a stand on principle that may well result in electoral defeat, surely you aren’t afraid to examine the wisdom of your position, to subject it to rational analysis.

The potential for harm from this radical social experiment to redefine marriage is clearly set out in a collection of essays by Canadian academics with expertise in law, sociology and politics. We are advised that the published compilation of their warnings, the book Divorcing Marriage, has been sent to each Member of Parliament. Have you read it?

[. . . . ] We hope you will find your copy of Divorcing Marriage and take a few minutes to read the section titled “The Casualties” beginning on page 41. As the evidence piles up, you may be tempted to take refuge behind the argument “but this is theoretical. It can’t be proven.” Then read this, by Katherine K. Young and Paul Nathanson (one of whom is gay):

“Given the importance of marriage in every society, the burden of proof... surely lies with those who want to make dramatic changes. In other words, it is their responsibility to show that these changes are likely to improve society or, at the very least, unlikely to damage it. So far, advocates of gay marriage have not done so. ...They want to indulge in a massive experiment... leaving future generations to pick up the pieces.”

As you read page after page of warnings about the impact of redefining marriage on society, and especially on the rights of children – our most vulnerable citizens – you might consider columnist Barbara Kay’s report of her conversation with a Canadian judge about homosexual adoption after C-38. In the judge’s opinion, “gay… rights should trump a biological mother’s right to have her child raised in a normative family.”

You thought this issue was about equal rights! The principle of equality tends to be trumpeted by parties who want to apply it unevenly.

Since same-sex unions (and heterosexual common-law relationships) already receive most of the financial benefits of marriage, and since the civil unions Mr. Harper proposes would fill in any gaps, we suspect that your support for same-sex marriage is driven by something other than a commitment to equal protection under the law. Do you see marriage as a vehicle for combating animosity toward gays? If so, your motives are laudable but your course is misguided. Your solution to one wrong is liable to create an even greater wrong for many, many more than the currently afflicted. Surely there’s a better way.

This issue needs to be honestly and openly examined, in the light of day. Instead, debate is stifled by name-calling on both sides. While some who want to preserve traditional marriage portray supporters of same-sex marriage as conspirators, bent on destroying the family, generally the media and our government ministers dismiss the opposition to C-38 as simple bigotry. You, who are fair-minded, could help to bridge the abyss between both sides and enable the principled discussion that must take place. But not if you permit yourself to be carried away by the rhetoric of one side, ignoring the evidence of resulting social upheaval.

It is unworthy of those trusted with government to remain so uninformed as they embark upon legislation that will affect all future generations of Canadians. Years of analysis and study are undertaken before building a pipeline or a powerline or redeveloping a former industrial site. We listen to the environmentalists. But most of our leaders refuse to examine the cause and effect analysis of the proposal to change the definition of marriage, betraying the trust conferred upon Members of Parliament by the Canadian people.

We trust that you will take the time now to examine that analysis that has been provided you in Divorcing Marriage. We look forward to hearing from you again when you have done so.

Sincerely your constituents,

(Signed by 194 constituents as of Feb. 23, with more names being added and forwarded periodically.)

The Circle Lies Unbroken: drugs . . . gangs . . . money . . . financing for terrorism and more criminality . . . and then more of the same

Outaouais link to busted drug ring Andrew Seymour, Ottawa Sun, February 24, 2005

Why would cocaine emerge from the Outaouais district? Does it come in by plane? If by truck, from what direction? I could see it emanating from somewhere near the coast . . . but Outaouais is the area across the Ottawa River from Ottawa -- close to the seat of power.

Police have dismantled a Quebec City drug network with ties to the Hells Angels that was allegedly being supplied with cocaine from the Outaouais. About 450 officers from four police departments, including the RCMP and Quebec provincial police, yesterday arrested about 30 people during approximately 40 raids on homes, cottages and businesses in 20 municipalities across Quebec. [. . . . ]


Search: probationary member, operating in, for a price, ecstasy, meth, speed, $50 million, Hells





Grow ops across Canada: I have learned there are probably 50,000 -- but if manpower is too stunted to do something about all of them, there is the potential for income of $1-million a year from just one house in which there is a grow-op. With legalization, why, think of the businesses Canadians can develop . . .

Apparently, even national parks can be sources for the 10,000 hard core gang members along with about 8000 street gang toughs in just Toronto. They are able to realize $25-billion and have at least 10,000 hard core members plus street gang member sof which there are about 8000 in Toronto alone

If the criminality is so high and burgeoning, why does our government not do something major about it? I suggest it would cost too much, given the size of the problem so they have downloaded it onto the citizens -- those same citizens who have been and are being virtually disarmed while crooks don't bother about such niceties as registration. The citizens are now on their own. They are the victims.

To do something about this situation government(s) would have to:


* provide sufficient manpower to police departments to rout out the criminals and their enterprises -- and prepare the paperwork which is extraordinarily onerous in big cases -- but ever prevalent in even small cases -- for

"the alleged" must be protected against just about everything law enforcement might do -- unlike the rest of us whose representatives must now give sufficient time to inhabitants in premises they wish to search to answer the door; police must not break doors down, even when, in hindsight we know a grow op or drugs were found -- now, the grow-op farmers and other drug businessmen and suppliers may have the time available to get rid of the evidence.


* stop catering to voting blocs who do not want to accept the truth and prefer to cry "racism" rather than co-operate in cleaning up their own communities -- applicable to federal or municipal political considerations and communities

* engage other security services who would follow the links and the networks and devote copious amounts of time to dotting the i's and crossing the t's in the paperwork -- which expands because criminals, particularly gangs, have copious amounts of proceeds of crime $$$ to hire lawyers to fight -- and it has turned out to be a lucrative career move for those in the legal field who manage to survive unscathed, whether from their clients or police personnel

* then the justice system would have to provide judges and well-briefed prosecutors who, in turn, would need research assistants for the mounds of paperwork the bureaucracy demands particularly in large cases--but also in small -- expensive and time consuming

* build, equip and staff large prisons and actually punish criminals -- omitting the get away with just about anything approach which includes: house arrest, counselling, soft sentencing guidelines--the healing / sentencing circles and puff-ball sentences for currently protected groups, the "criminal as a victim of society' approach (with its proliferation of the 'caring professions and professionals' who need 'victims of society' to stay in business), the approach which treats all criminals as though they could be healed with the application of enough love, respect and caring--though they chose their criminal lifestyles -- all these and the rest of our justice system -- oh, yes, and in hiring the various services must practice diversity, not rely on merit.

Equal outcomes are so much more difficult to achieve than are equal opportunities -- to get them just right -- to assuage voting blocs.


The result?

* The police are stymied -- they are handcuffed and have no whistleblower protection--and won't have with the latest legislation proposed -- they are punished if they attempt to let Canadians know the situation

* The police have inadequate resources -- just read some of the entries on this site and check out the current budget

* Their numbers are being decimated by retirement--often early--and coming on the heels of despair, for, when the best try to do their jobs and let the populace know the extent of the problem, they are punished; it is a career-ending move -- The best investigators left as soon as they could. Why would any of these people stick their necks out? -- when they know their government doesn't care and does not want this information to get out -- and the media find it easier to comply by going along. People don't want to jeapardize their pensions after laying their lives on the line for 25-30 years

Think of how the Auditor General is discredited at every opportunity. Think of ex-civil servants, ex-RCMP Cpl. Read, ex-foreign service officer Brian McAdam, ex-BDC head, Laurent (?) Beaudoin, and countless others who have tried to blow the whistle on various aspects of the network of criminality--the corruption of government, the reserve system perpetuated by a government which throws $$$ at problems without much accountability, a reserve system which breeds myriad problems, the criminal gangs such as the triads, Hells Angels, etc., the IRB / immigration / refugee system, the political power applied to the BDC in the service of those politically connected . . . . . . and more.


Internationally Caanda is known as a haven for crooks and terrorists.




A digression is in order here.

"He actually spoke to me [Inspector Bill Majcher] about the merits and benefits of bringing my criminal enterprise to Canada versus staying in the United States, where there are real consequences to criminal conduct," [quotation from article just below]


Lawyer guilty of money-laundering -- Police say conviction in 2002 sting shows growing sophistication of organized crime Paul Waldiem February 23, 2005

A Toronto lawyer was found guilty of money laundering yesterday in a case the RCMP say demonstrates the growing sophistication of organized crime.

Simon Rosenfeld was one of about 55 Canadian and U.S. citizens arrested in 2002 as part of a sweeping RCMP-FBI sting called Bermuda Short, which exposed a raft of stock-market manipulation and money-laundering scams. [. . . . ]



Search: 55 Canadian and U.S. citizens, stock-market manipulation, money-laundering scams, Colombian cocaine cartel, organized crime organizations, Hells Angels.

Check the Criminal Intelligence Service Canada - 2004 report and select "print version" which will lead to the Adobe Acrobat Reader .pdf file version which you may download

Talk to some who know; listen to tales of paper shuffling and bureaucracy -- busy work to go along with government talk, consultation, and the magic words "it is under investigation" -- all designed to keep the problem on the back burner--from boiling over into Canadians' rage -- and the officers are sworn to silence.

Perfect!

The morals of alley cats operate in the service of re-election, self-advancement and riches -- think:

* sponsorship
* Shawinigate
* Beaudoin affair -- JC presiding
* HRDC
* gun registry -- Remember, the government has squandered over a billion dollars ($1-BILLION) on the gun registry but can't find the money for an RCMP lab in Alberta; they have overseen the closure of 9 RCMP detachments in Quebec alone, despite cries from the citizens and Opposition MP's not to do this.

Do you honestly think members of our government are surprised?
That the leaders and most members knew nothing? Being out of the loop, perhaps on the back benches, is either a badge to be desired and evidence of high moral character or evidence of a finely-honed, self-protective stupidity -- illustrative of, with apologies to Hannah Arendt,

"the banality of ignorance of evil"


A book that might be of interest on the RCMP, The Last Guardians by Paul Palango, a Canadian Author, Published: November 1998, ISBN: 0771069065 · Published by McClelland & Stewart Inc

Undoubtedly, there are other sources.

First Khadr and now...What a great country for crooks and terrorists -- and "privacy", CSIS: Certificates, TO: Julian Fantino, Terrorists in Canada

Who authorized the entry of this Khadr?

"Email me" returned terrorist invites Canadians Judi McLeod, Canadafreepress.com, February 26, 2005

Check one of the links below for more on the Khadr family, including Zaynab Khan. CBC presented a program on the Khadrs some time in the last year. Both mother and daughter were interviewed by Terence McKenna, if I have remembered correctly. Check for it.

When Zaynab Khadr slipped quietly into Toronto on February 17, officials seized her pictures, papers, laptop and cellphone. What they couldn’t seize was whatever the 25-year-old daughter of the Prime Minister Jean Chretien-rescued Ahmed Said Khadr carries about in her head.

The late Ahmed Said Khadr, officially identified as Canada’s highest-ranking member of Al Qaeda, was set free from a Pakistani prison, when Prime Minister Jean Chretien intervened on his behalf.


Search: Pakistan, Prime Minister Paul Martin, outspoken, Scarborough, lobby, wedding, Foreign affairs, Rodney Moore, privacy laws, passports, American, "email Khadr at:"




Terrorist returns: Peter MacKay urges Ottawa to consider revoking citizenship Stewart Bell, Feb. 26, 05, National Post

TORONTO - One of Canada's most notorious terrorist leaders has returned home to Montreal after serving four years in a French prison for his role in an international jihadist network.

Fateh Kamel, a 44-year-old Algerian-Canadian who headed a Montreal-based extremist cell, arrived in Montreal on Jan. 29 aboard an Air France flight, sources told the National Post.

[. . . . ] "Kamel was a key member of the international Islamist terrorist network of the mujahedeen, or holy warriors ... determined to strike the Western world order that they considered corrupt and immoral," according to a Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) document. [. . . . ]


Search: Groupe Fateh Kamel, Jordan, tried in Paris, good behaviour, Canadian wife, ideologue, Islamic extremist cell, Algerians and Moroccans. a branch, Algerian GIA, bin Laden's al-Qaeda network, Karim Said Atmani, Bosnia, Liberian cargo ship, Ressam, discussed bombing a . . . , biological and chemical weapons

Just read it. There is good reason to question what is going on in our justice system today -- instances where appeals to Charter rights defy common sense.




Kamel, Fateh. Born in Algeria, and a one-time member of the GIA, he was the leader of the Montreal Salafist Cell in the 1990s. He has been convicted in France for passing black-market passports to Islamic militants.


Other people's wars: A Review of Overseas Terrorism in Canada John Thompson is President of the Mackenzie Institute which studies political instability and terrorism. He can be reached at: jt AT mackenzieinstitute.com.

After each of item that follows is a list of sub-headings which are links to even more information. This list includes some of Canada's nearest and dearest -- the ones the lefties and Islamic co-supporters defend as "good boys" who always "attended the mosque", which is, of course, the problem. (IMHO)

Assume . . . . after each.

Table of Contents:
Chapter One: On the Nature and Characteristics of Terrorism
Chapter Two: Terrorist Groups with a Presence in Canada
Chapter Three: Terrorist Supporters and Politics
Chapter Four: Open Money, Open Power
Chapter Five: Terrorism and Crime
Chapter Six: Veterans of Other People’s Wars
Chapter Seven: The Security of the Nation

Appendix: A List of Canadian Terrorists

The following list includes a variety of terrorists and key supporters who have lived in Canada while on the run for terrorist actions in a homeland conflict, or who have acted on behalf of an overseas terrorist organization after establishing a Canadian residence. Naturally, the list is far from being definitive.


[. . . . ] Jabarah, Mohamed Mansour
[. . . . ] Kadr, Abdul Rahman.
[. . . . ] Kadr, Ahmad Said (also spelled as ‘Khadr’).
[. . . . ] Kadr, Omar. The teenaged son of Ahmad Said Kadr, this under-educated boy killed a US Army medic in Afghanistan in 2002 with a grenade while fighting as a member of al Qaeda.

Kamel, Fateh. Born in Algeria, and a one-time member of the GIA, he was the leader of the Montreal Salafist Cell in the 1990s. He has been convicted in France for passing black-market passports to Islamic militants.


For a true picture of Canada, and drawing from the world of "diversity", "multiculturalism", and the "immigration" / "refugee" process -- one result of that "kinder, gentler" Canada touted by Liberals and their Peime Ministers trolling for votes are these dangerous entrants brought to Canadians through our open borders in action; just skim through this list.




Canadians have been and are played for fools -- Who gave permission to enter? -- probably retired today and living well

INDEPTH: KHADR CBC News Online, March 3, 2004 -- Also, check here; you have to register for this one

There is information on each of these members of a terrorist family which our ex-PM Jean Chretien helped. I suppose it plays well in the community when you go to the polls. And that man gets to enjoy a rich retirement.

The Khadr family

* Ahmed Said Khadr
* Maha Khadr
* Zaynab Khadr
* Abdullah Khadr
Information from the Taliban released on Feb. 4, 2004, suggested he may have been the suicide bomber who killed a Canadian soldier in Kabul in January 2004.

* Abdurahman Khadr
* Omar Khadr
* Abdul Karim Khadr






There was no comparable outcry from the government while they were shuffling money to their corrupt sponsorship / Adscam / slush fund for certain people and areas of the country. When it looks as though their corruption might be revealed or Canadians might get a picture of what has been going on, all of a sudden the government becomes money conscious.

Cost of Maher Arar inquiry on the rise, federal documents show Jim Brown, Feb. 26, 05, CP

[. . . . ] Seamas Gordon, a department spokesman, said most of that money went to pay the fees for lawyers representing federal officials called to testify before O'Connor.

It's standard practice for the government to cover the legal costs incurred by any present or former bureaucrat in the course of official duties. [. . . . ]


Arar inquiry price tag: $23M Feb. 26, 05, Jim Brown, CP

[. . . . ] The figures made public yesterday show the justice department was by far the biggest spender.

It reported $6.05 million in costs for "activities associated with" the affair. [. . . . ]


Why, it sounds almost like a court challenges program. Keep them talking about Maher Arar's "rights" in the face of the testimony from members of CSIS, whom Canadians pay for their investigations and what they are able to learn. Besides, for CSIS to reveal all could compromise ongoing investigations, the methods and the investigators involved. Again, consider spending money on our safety before that of Mr. Arar in the dispensing of taxpayer $$$ -- or was the Charter simply a permanent employment program for lawyers? Let's see, now, PET and JC were lawyers -- and who knows how many others were from the legal profession who were involved in bringing us this long term high income system for lawyers.





Certificates best way to hold terrorist suspects -- CSIS: Anti-terrorism act review: Former spy boss says system keeps suspects from getting passports James Gordon, CanWest, Feb. 23, 05

I was irritated to see this article in the National Post not on the front page where it belonged, but next to the fold well inside the paper. I expect more concern for Canadians and for the word of members of our security services. If there is a Stephen Harper gaffe, even one committed by some staffer, it is front page news.

OTTAWA - Security certificates are essential to stop terrorists from gaining citizenship and valuable Canadian passports, Canada's former spy boss said yesterday.

Dale Neufeld, who handed over control of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service to current director Jim Judd last month, said suspects are ''easier to deal with'' under the controversial certificate process.

''The problem is they come here and, if we're lucky, we uncover their pedigree and their terrorist connections,'' he said.

''The problem is they want to do nothing for three years, they want to acquire that magic Canadian citizenship and the passport that goes with it, before they re-immerse themselves in the terrorist milieu.'' [. . . . ]


Search: six people, Adil Charkaoui, the children of Muslims that are born in this country, Public Safety Minister Anne McLellan, overseas intelligence.




I think the following is related, when we consider the outcry over the cost of the Arar inquiry.

Greg Weston: "Thanks for the 31 cent tax cut" -- And inflation's only 2%


Just link for the details.

Thanks for the 31 cent tax cut February 24, 2005, Greg Weston, Sun Ottawa

[. . . . ] In the budget that minority politics built, Paul Martin's government has something for everyone, not a lot for anyone, and a stunning 31 cents a week in personal tax cuts (this is not a misprint), soaring to 62 cents in 2007.

[. . . . ] But the government is rolling in so much of our dough that it literally cannot spend all those billions fast enough. [. . . . ]


Search: squirreling, $1,000 for every taxpayer, refund cheques, bilked, stashes, the trust doesn't exist, third-party trust, daycare, millitary, new contingency fund




RCMP closes forensics lab CBC, 25 Feb 2005

The RCMP lab in Alberta is closed to save $1.2 million a year but it will cost $3.3 million to shut it down to "save money" -- for what, in particular? Another ad campaign for the next election? Does our government not want the RCMP to be successful in crime fighting or is Canadians' security secondary to 'business'? There won't be any business if this government doesn't get serious about security in Canada. NJC

[. . . . ] Last year, documents obtained by the CBC showed the RCMP doesn't have enough people to do DNA analysis, and cuts were worsening the problem. [. . . . ]


Link to this article to find out what this lab may be tasked to do.





Anti-terrorism programs get $1B boost -- Airports, borders, seaports to be focus of new spending Feb. 23, 05

[. . . . ] The budget also sets aside $193 million over five years for renewal of justice-related initiatives aimed at crime prevention, assisting victims and taking action against war criminals. [. . . . ]





Toronto Police Chief Julian Fantino -- Why not reinstate him? Link to find out what is being said about a situation where politics took precedence over crime fighting

Fight for top cop is on -- Boyd, Blair lead race to replace police chief Rob Granatstein, City Hall Bureau, Feb. 26, 05

Link to find out what is planned -- search: "This comes from the highest levels. . . They want . . . there for two years, then . . . in to run the show."



Not everyone agrees; link for this one.

City needs another Fantino Feb. 26, 05

Julian Fantino should still be Toronto's police chief.

Our dysfunctional police services board can insist all it wants that it simply refused to renew Fantino's five-year contract.

But as far as we're concerned, it fired Fantino for political reasons and its actions have been a disgrace. [. . . . ]