June 13, 2006

June 13, 2006: Islamic Nuclear bomb? Who? Me?

NUCLEAR WAR-FEAR -- Pakistan pressured to produce Khan – 'father of Islamic bomb'

U.N. desperate to question scientist after evidence of enriched uranium found at Iranian military site
June 11, 06


[....] U.S. officials and U.N. inspectors believe Khan, the "father of the Islamic bomb," who remains under house arrest in Pakistan after confessing he had provided both Iran and North Korea with details of how to make their own nuclear bombs, has important information about Tehran's nuclear program.

In January, IAEA inspectors found traces of highly enriched uranium, which could be weapons grade, in vacuum pumps at the destroyed and leveled Lavizan-Shian site in Tehran – a site Iran denied had been used for its nuclear work. The find casts further doubts on Iran's claims its program is intended only for peaceful purposes. [....]


In case it rains, you'll need something to read -- such as:

Special offers:

'Atomic Iran' proven accurate: Learn how the terrorist regime bought the bomb and American politicians
Are you prepared for nuclear terror? Get free report on practical steps for survival of 'inevitable' attack

Previous stories:

Brit MI6 confirms bin Laden nukes
Iran negotiator announces: We duped West on nukes
How Pakistan's Dr. X sold al-Qaida Islamic bomb
How al-Qaida got the bomb
Report: Scientist gave Iran nuke material
U.N.'s proliferation failures alarm U.S.
New evidence of Egyptian nuke program
The 'Islamic Bomb' spreads over globe
Bin Laden met nuke scientists




The terrorist next door: What is taught in mosques is never challenged, questioned, or scrutinized. .... We, Muslims seem ... more concerned after times like this with the possible "backlash" as opposed to self examination and scrutiny. Thinking Blog

http://
www.threaddump.org/cgi-bin/mt/mtb.cgi/62

The terrorist next door June 06, 2006

http://
www.threaddump.org/tblog/archives
/2006/06/the_terrorist_n.html


[....] 1. Muslims in Canada, and in the West in general, are mostly completely isolated from their surroundings. They live in close-knit exclusivist communities and they fail miserably in integrating with the Western society they chose to live within.

2. The Muslim community in Canada is extremely passive-aggressive. They are disengaged from mostly every social and political aspect of the place they call home.

3. What is taught in mosques is never challenged, questioned, or scrutinized. 43-year-old Qayyum Abdul Jamal, the oldest suspect in the case, is said to have repeatedly delivered Friday sermons that were filled with hate against Canada; as reported by the Associated Press. If that was the case, why didn't anyone in the community raise a flag?

4. We, Muslims, as Christie Blatchford said in her article, seem to always be more concerned after times like this with the possible "backlash" as opposed to self examination and scrutiny.

In this atmosphere of the self perpetual cycles of unexamined and unchallenged dogma, coupled with the predominant passive-aggressive mentality in addition to an entitlement mindset that is in a constant state of self imposed victimhood it becomes easy to lure young minds into thinking they can become instant heros/revolutionaries. An instant illusion of purpose, belonging, and mission.

In addition, contemporary Islamic ideology is in dire need of reform, and those of us who are capable of speaking out have to speak out or, as I repeatedly said in this blog, the terrorists will speak for us.




There’s no plot, says Anthony Browne: Islam really does want to conquer the world. That’s because Muslims, unlike many Christians, actually believe they are right, and that their religion is the path to salvation for all. Anthony Browne, The Spectator, July 22, 04 posted by David Virtue, an Anglican website

Anthony Browne is Europe correspondent for the Times.

Take Dr Al-Qaradawi, the controversial Egyptian imam who was recently fawned over by the Mayor of London even though he promotes the execution of homosexuals, the right of men to indulge in domestic violence, and the murder of innocent Jews. During the brouhaha it went unnoticed that he also wants to conquer Europe. Don’t take my word for it, just listen to him on his popular al-Jazeera TV show, Sharia and Life.

‘Islam will return to Europe. The conquest need not necessarily be by the sword. Perhaps we will conquer these lands without armies. We want an army of preachers and teachers who will present Islam in all languages and in all dialects,’ he broadcast in 1999, according to the Middle East Media Research Institute, which translates his programmes. On another programme he declared, ‘Europe will see that it suffers from a materialist culture, and it will seek a way out, it will seek a lifeboat. It will seek no life-saver but the message of Islam.’

[....] Saudi Arabia, whose flag shows a sword, seems unabashed about its desire for Islam to take over the world. Its embassy in Washington recommends the home page of its Islamic affairs department, where it declares, ‘The Muslims are required to raise the banner of jihad in order to make the Word of Allah supreme in this world.’ Saudi Arabia has used billions of its petrodollars to export its particularly harsh form of Islam, Wahabism, paying for mosques and Islamic schools across the West. About 80 per cent of the US’s mosques are thought to be under Wahabi control.

Saudi Arabia’s education ministry encourages schoolchildren to despise Christianity and Judaism. A new schoolbook in the kingdom’s curriculum tells six-year-olds: ‘All religions other than Islam are false.’ A note for teachers says they should ‘ensure to explain’ this point. In Egypt, the schoolbook Studies in Theology: Traditions and Morals explains that a particularly ‘noble’ bit of the Koran is ‘encouraging the faithful to perform jihad in God’s cause, to behead the infidels, take them prisoner, break their power — all that in a style which contains the highest examples of urging to fight’.

A popular topic for discussion on Arabic TV channels is the best strategy for conquering the West. It seems to be agreed that since the West has overwhelming economic, military and scientific power, it could take some time, and a full frontal assault could prove counterproductive. Muslim immigration and conversion are seen as the best path.

[....] In Muslim tradition, the world is divided into Dar al-Islam, where Muslims rule, and Dar al-Harb, the ‘field of war’ where the infidels live. ‘The presumption is that the duty of jihad will continue, interrupted only by truces, until all the world either adopts the Muslim faith or submits to Muslim rule,’ wrote Professor Bernard Lewis in his bestseller The Crisis of Islam.’

[....] I believe in a free market in religions, and it is inevitable that if you believe your religion is true, then you believe others are false. But this market is seriously rigged. In Saudi Arabia the government bans all churches, while in Europe governments pay to build Islamic cultural centres. While in many Islamic countries preaching Christianity is banned, in Western Christian countries the right to preach Islam is enshrined in law.

Christians are free to convert to Islam, while Muslims who convert to Christianity can expect either death threats or a death sentence. The Pope keeps apologising for the Crusades (even though they were just attempts to get back former Christian lands) while his opposite numbers call for the overthrow of Christendom.

In Christian countries, those who warn about Islamification, such as the film star Brigitte Bardot, are prosecuted, while in Muslim countries those who call for the Islamification of the world are turned into TV celebrities. In the West, schools teach comparative religion, while in Muslim countries schools teach that Islam is the only true faith. David Blunkett in effect wants to ban criticism of Islam, a protection not enjoyed by Christianity in Muslim countries. Millions of Muslims move to Christian countries, but virtually no Christians move to Muslim ones.

In the last century some Christians justified the persecution and mass murder of Jews by claiming that Jews wanted to take over the world. But these fascist fantasies were based on deliberate lies, such as the notorious fake book The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Now, many in the Muslim world are open about their desire for Islam to conquer the West.


There is much more -- a must read.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home