May 10, 2006 Update 3

Just heard: CBC reports Maurice Vellacott will resign as chair of the aboriginal affairs committee, I believe. There is no free speech in Canada. He is not liked by the aboriginals who see the Liberal giveaways-for-votes changing so ... Furthermore, he said what countless numbers of Canadians think about the God-like Supremes; that was the capper. CBC makes sure you don't forget it. The Supremes are so useful under Liberal management. Dear me, have I gone too far in my speech? So dismiss me ... or diss me.



Today's lesson, all you little people? Don't ever question the influences on ... or is that the impartiality ... of the Supremes

Burning Maurice by MP Garth Turner

Mostly my thought is this: If an MP, an educated and experienced MP, is not elected to come to this town and talk plainly about how we are governed, then what the hell is he here for? Canadians expect us to be legislators, not apologists. If the courts (unelected) or the PMO (also unelected) try to steal too much power, then who else is there to speak out? The country belongs to the people. We, the MPs, are their eyes, ears and, yeah, their voice.

And the MP's mentioned speak for many of us on this issue! The Supremes have overstepped their roles too much. We have MP's to tell them so (and people like me to whinge). When I hear or read how normally intelligent people all but abase themselves in praising these very human supreme court justices, I cringe for what Canada has become ... wimps afraid of saying what they think in the face of the Lib/CBC media/propaganda juggernaut and their social engineering of correct speak over many years. I am outraged at the fear of speaking out in this country.

There are plenty of comments pro and con on Garth's website.



Justice McLachlin's interview with the Western Standard

Supreme Supremes? Or are the elected Parliamentarians supreme? Or do the two jockey back and forth? ... depending upon whether the Liberals are in power or not? Rights expand under Librano$ rule (gays, natives, etc) and contract under conservatives, I gather. The CBC is there to fight for a return of the natural governing party that mostly, appoints the Supremes who seem to be appointed forever ... and you who disagree may pay for the whole ruling and propaganda system.


The charter is dead -- But was it ever alive in the first place? Kevin Libin, Apr. 24, 06

[....] No, the charter doesn't say "this is it forever" It is amendable. If Parliament wants to add new clauses, it can do so, using democratic means ... But then, if our Constitution is so "flexible" that it can be changed anytime a group of nine jurists deem it appropriate, what exactly is the point of having one in the first place?